Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, mean wall-clock duration of a slot, over ten epochs, published by Trillium, and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanTrilliumSlot timeIBRLScore
EVQzzV…fuW29Wmainnettestnet
EVw3bj…HNU7Zgmainnettestnet
EW1ppd…JPquVqmainnettestnet
EwbKQd…jnRqnKmainnettestnet
Ewbw2n…v2MkhDmainnettestnet
EWchhm…uTzEKFmainnettestnet
EwHVcc…UzWL9qmainnettestnet
EWN6HE…pnYhkLmainnettestnet
EwUVzg…zPELrumainnettestnet
EXhE3m…pAUUPRmainnettestnet
EXoyQF…xBbPenmainnettestnet
EXsJCa…rWwJBcmainnettestnet
EXuuYS…HTbnRcmainnettestnet
EXwVFb…1TdwKsmainnettestnet
EYmbLo…ZDdshpmainnettestnet
EYQTjN…HEdUewmainnettestnet
EyqYzu…KfsHqvmainnettestnet
EytB6i…QQKfVFmainnettestnet
EZ9KxK…PTVhxPmainnettestnet
EzcWy7…i3L5cNmainnettestnet
Ezfmnz…ghrkpYmainnettestnet
EZHZcX…UwkXRVmainnettestnet
EZKUeo…8QVW2tmainnettestnet
EZPFK2…VfuCVNmainnettestnet
EztHQi…V5dzmwmainnettestnet
EzTKnB…WD8EG6mainnettestnet
Ezwjvr…8nbKA7mainnettestnet
F1RG5w…J9cqrBmainnettestnet
F1rubR…b7PqQgmainnettestnet
F1x2Z2…ctjog3mainnettestnet
F1y4xd…N6H54Qmainnettestnet
F23cb7…jEvxBMmainnettestnet
F2qxgo…yDQehsmainnettestnet
F2sX2Y…AcCaQRmainnettestnet
F31NBo…F7Ynm5mainnettestnet
F3tdN8…s5YJh8mainnettestnet
F3xA4k…NQMU5Bmainnettestnet
F4ToPc…6of9Xdmainnettestnet
F5ERVa…KWNjNKmainnettestnet
F6kZWo…euN5Xamainnettestnet
F6oeMK…xsdLSHmainnettestnet
F6yqvm…MDF5ACmainnettestnet
F6zGjz…AwK762mainnettestnet
F78E3D…Fr8Q8dmainnettestnet
F79HDL…fWJPvKmainnettestnet
F7tzos…zWXCHpmainnettestnet
F8fD96…Bb35yJmainnettestnet
F8Msan…UMfqHkmainnettestnet
F8VzpC…t3XBkhmainnettestnet
F95rGC…CinGNymainnettestnet
F9BVNi…8yzjUamainnettestnet
F9cnuJ…zn1eACmainnettestnet
F9Ms8n…D2HQM9mainnettestnet
F9xy3z…rVAadRmainnettestnet
Fa17nm…fhpz2tmainnettestnet
FA7CDB…ir9ZyPmainnettestnet
FAHMjh…BUt6Eumainnettestnet
FAmVpV…N1LvComainnettestnet
farbZX…XiKACfmainnettestnet
farm9L…c6ggDjmainnettestnet
FASTxx…ano2NDmainnettestnet
Fb1QJB…fkNpq7mainnettestnet
FB4wAF…BKMTYxmainnettestnet
Fbgo1V…1hYbjLmainnettestnet
FbHP4M…cHHTNSmainnettestnet
FBNstg…tRen3ymainnettestnet
FBodRH…CX5FTmmainnettestnet
FbqVf8…oA5jSVmainnettestnet
FbRNfy…sxDzcamainnettestnet
FBxvbG…ds758bmainnettestnet
Fc1g5T…8V8mKnmainnettestnet
FcDttU…H58yYRmainnettestnet
FcH3xR…m3ucKAmainnettestnet
FcJD7k…hHZUrEmainnettestnet
FcMt1y…x9da5Tmainnettestnet
FCqpFq…Lxz9Qamainnettestnet
FcVsAP…w8W7RMmainnettestnet
Fdeviq…6ykcqymainnettestnet
FDfEQw…ZHVDaJmainnettestnet
FdHrDk…3RhAxsmainnettestnet
FdjC5T…ZQ7r6cmainnettestnet
FDTqvL…JoeCqwmainnettestnet
FdvSkA…o5Ywzamainnettestnet
FdVUee…CofqqUmainnettestnet
FdwP3p…fz7EWrmainnettestnet
FDWtWp…zGj9V2mainnettestnet
FDY8M8…1ZXrFZmainnettestnet
Fe1PR2…akob2nmainnettestnet
FehNWM…6oJ5Pimainnettestnet
Fem8pm…bfwCP2mainnettestnet
FENvV1…i4nWcqmainnettestnet
FeqUBy…QxdLFxmainnettestnet
Ff5G9w…UCWZpqmainnettestnet
Ff7zwn…tetpsqmainnettestnet
Ffdp3P…n1YPDxmainnettestnet
FFEycB…rQS8ugmainnettestnet
FFUTGe…TeQrLVmainnettestnet
FfxZhf…yqTwQ5mainnettestnet
FFYKBp…gppgJwmainnettestnet
Fg1aHs…uQFdnYmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Slot time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerTrillium’s own boundary, not this site’s: 410ms is where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.