Tree Validator

Approvedmainnet-beta + testnetonboarded epoch 973 · 17 May 2026KYC kyc valid

In the program and receiving mainnet-beta delegation. Also runs testnet — that is mandatory, not optional.

Mainnet-beta vote account: TREEir31FswHK7JZBS5oFQteS72dobi6inpmQha88dATREEir31…mQha88dA
Testnet vote account: FASTnryXt4jqN7hoJfGt3Rum8g26qbKDQk5Mywp1QrTDFASTnryX…ywp1QrTD

Compliance, per cluster

Each criterion below compares a measured value against the threshold the program published for that cluster and epoch. The dashed line is the limit; the bar is the measurement. Nothing here is hardcoded: change the epoch and the limits move.

Mainnet-beta

epoch 1016BONUS

10 passingFrankfurt am Main, DE · AS29066

Vote credits

6,897,010 (101.30% of avg)PASS

≥ 97% of the cluster's 5-epoch averagelimit 6,604,084 (97%)

Skip rate (5 epoch)

0.00%PASS

≤ 5% of assigned leader slots skippedlimit 5%

Commission

5%PASS

≤ 5%limit 5%

Commission integrity

cleanPASS

no commission rugrequired clean

MEV commission

10%PASS

≤ 10%limit 10%

Firedancer version

0.1104.0-rc.40200PASS

≥ 0.1104.0-rc.40200required 0.1104.0-rc.40200

Datacenter concentration

1.011%PASS

≤ 15% of cluster stake in your datacenterlimit 15%

Provider concentration

1.011%PASS

≤ 25% of cluster stake with your providerlimit 25%

Network (ASN)

AS29066 · velia.net Internetdienste GmbHPASS

not on the blocked listrequired blocked: AS283232, AS283231

Testnet participation

8 of 10PASS

≥ 5 of the last 10 testnet epochs at Baseline or betterlimit 5 of 10

Activated stake: 206.5K SOL
Foundation stake: 83.5K SOL
Vote credits: 6,897,010
Client: 0.1104.0-rc.40200

Testnet

epoch 1007BONUS

8 passingAmsterdam, NL · AS206264

Vote credits

6,679,903 (127.92% of avg)PASS

≥ 85% of the cluster's 5-epoch averagelimit 4,438,633 (85%)

Skip rate (5 epoch)

0.88%PASS

≤ 40% of assigned leader slots skippedlimit 40%

Commission

100%PASS

≤ 100%limit 100%

Commission integrity

cleanPASS

no commission rugrequired clean

Firedancer version

0.1105.40200PASS

≥ 0.1102.0-beta.40201required 0.1102.0-beta.40201

Datacenter concentration

0.690%PASS

≤ 100% of cluster stake in your datacenterlimit 100%

Provider concentration

0.690%PASS

≤ 100% of cluster stake with your providerlimit 100%

Network (ASN)

AS206264 · Amarutu Technology LtdPASS

not on the blocked listrequired blocked: AS283232, AS283231

Activated stake: 80.3K SOL
Foundation stake: 80.2K SOL
Vote credits: 6,679,903
Client: 0.1105.40200

Program grade history

The grade the program assigned for each epoch it assessed. Bonus met the higher bar that earns additional stake; Baseline met the requirement without it; Nonemeans the epoch’s requirements were not met. An epoch with no grade at all was not assessed: it counts as neither pass nor fail, and renders as an empty track. Select a tile to read that epoch’s detail, including the failure reason where the program published one.

Bonus: passed, full-height bar
Baseline: passed, 60% bar
Not met (None): failed, low bar
Not graded: not assessed, empty track

Mainnet-beta

epochs 973–1016 · 44 graded · 38 Bonus · 0 Baseline · 6 None · 0 not graded

Bonus, last 10: 10/10
Bonus, last 13: 100.0%
Bonus, all epochs: 86.36%
Bonus or Baseline: 86.36%
Vote credit score: 0.672
Avg skip rate: 0%

The program’s own figures, as published, not derived by this site.

epochs 977–1016 of 973–1016

epoch 1016 · ~12 Aug 2026 · Bonus

Met the higher bonus bar for this epoch.

epoch 973 · 17 May 2026epoch 1016 · ~12 Aug 2026

Failed epochs6

epoch 997 · 04 Jul 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION)
epoch 996 · ~02 Jul 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION)
epoch 986 · ~12 Jun 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 980 · ~31 May 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 974 · 19 May 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 973 · 17 May 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)

Testnet

epochs 874–1007 · 130 graded · 96 Bonus · 7 Baseline · 27 None · 4 not graded

Bonus, last 10: 8/10
Bonus, last 13: 84.6%
Bonus, all epochs: 73.85%
Bonus or Baseline: 79.23%
Vote credit score: 0.868
Avg skip rate: 0.1%

The program’s own figures, as published, not derived by this site.

epochs 968–1007 of 874–1007

epoch 1007 · ~18 Aug 2026 · Bonus

Met the higher bonus bar for this epoch.

epoch 874 · 23 Nov 2025epoch 1007 · ~18 Aug 2026

Failed epochs27

Show all 27 failed epochs

epoch 1004 · ~13 Aug 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION)
epoch 1001 · ~07 Aug 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 993 · ~22 Jul 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 979 · ~24 Jun 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS) · Skip rate too high (HIGH_SKIP_RATE)
epoch 978 · ~22 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS) · Skip rate too high (HIGH_SKIP_RATE)
epoch 977 · ~20 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS) · Skip rate too high (HIGH_SKIP_RATE)
epoch 976 · 18 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 975 · 16 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 966 · ~29 May 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION)
epoch 955 · ~08 May 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION)
epoch 954 · ~06 May 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION)
epoch 947 · ~23 Apr 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS) · Skip rate too high (HIGH_SKIP_RATE)
epoch 946 · ~21 Apr 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS) · Skip rate too high (HIGH_SKIP_RATE)
epoch 945 · ~19 Apr 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 939 · ~07 Apr 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 938 · ~05 Apr 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 914 · 18 Feb 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 907 · ~05 Feb 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS) · Skip rate too high (HIGH_SKIP_RATE)
epoch 906 · ~03 Feb 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS) · Skip rate too high (HIGH_SKIP_RATE)
epoch 904 · ~30 Jan 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS) · Skip rate too high (HIGH_SKIP_RATE)
epoch 903 · 28 Jan 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS) · Skip rate too high (HIGH_SKIP_RATE)
epoch 902 · ~26 Jan 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS) · Skip rate too high (HIGH_SKIP_RATE)
epoch 901 · ~23 Jan 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 900 · ~21 Jan 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 880 · 13 Dec 2025: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS) · Skip rate too high (HIGH_SKIP_RATE)
epoch 879 · 03 Dec 2025: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS) · Skip rate too high (HIGH_SKIP_RATE)
epoch 874 · 23 Nov 2025: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)

The program graded this validator before its recorded join date, so it was taking part earlier than that date implies. No earlier join date is published, so the graded span is the only evidence of when participation began.

“Graded span” is the first and last epoch the program published a grade for. For a validator no longer participating, the last graded epoch is strong evidence of when that ended, but the program states no exit date, so none is claimed here. Dates prefixed ~ are interpolated between known epoch boundaries.

Failure reasons are the program’s own machine-readable codes, collected by this site into a committed file; collection is still running, and the program published no reasons at all for most failures before roughly epoch 600. An unexplained failed epoch is still a failed epoch.

Build time

Median time the leader took to build a block on mainnet-beta, from IBRL, not from the Solana Foundation: the program publishes no measure of block building at all, so this is one of two figures here that are not its own, alongside Trillium slot duration.

Source

IBRL build time450 Trillium slot duration449

two different measurements, not two readings of one number

Mainnet-beta

epochs 1008–1017 ·IBRL

414.0 ms

epoch 1017 median, per block built

411 TO 425MS

Dashed lines: 410ms and 426ms. This site’s cut points, published by neither IBRL nor Trillium: IBRL bands no build time, and Trillium never measured it. They are the slot-duration marks, reused so the scale holds when you switch source. Neither is a Solana Foundation limit.

range 413.0 to 423.0ms · observed across this window: the last 5 readings average 4.4ms faster than the first 5

Where this comes from

Each epoch’s figure is IBRL’s own median_block_build_msfor that epoch, stored exactly as published, and the headline is the newest of them rather than an average: IBRL publishes no multi-epoch aggregate, and a mean of ten medians would be this site’s arithmetic wearing IBRL’s name. The 410ms and 426ms lines are this site’s cut points and belong to neither vendor: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured build time at all. They are the marks the slot-duration scale uses, reused here because both distributions sit in the same range, so switching source does not move the scale.

The Solana Foundation publishes no measure of block building and sets no such limit: its per-epoch endpoint carries 29 fields and not one of them is about how a block was built. Nothing here counts toward the program’s grades. Read from a snapshot committed to this repository, taken 2026-08-18 04:15:38 UTC, covering 450 validators on mainnet-beta. Nothing is fetched while this page renders.

The other source measures something else. Switching it changes the quantity on the axis, not the vendor reading one quantity: across the validators carrying both, slot duration and block build time correlate at 0.57, half of them differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Coverage differs too, so a validator can carry a figure under one source and none under the other.

Vote credit history

The last 64 epochs on each cluster, as a share of the credits achievable that epoch. The dashed line is the program’s floor converted to that same measure, so the two are genuinely comparable. Each axis is zoomed to its own data, with its range stated beneath the plot.

Mainnet-beta

% of credits achievable · last 64 epochs · axis 0.0–100.0%23 below floor20 delinquent

View as table

Epoch	Credits	Achievable	%	Status
1016	6,897,010	6,901,890	99.93	ok
1015	6,868,352	6,880,236	99.83	ok
1014	6,905,759	6,908,643	99.96	ok
1013	6,904,494	6,906,603	99.97	ok
1012	6,900,633	6,903,865	99.95	ok
1011	6,886,776	6,894,181	99.89	ok
1010	6,887,485	6,894,735	99.89	ok
1009	6,875,023	6,886,019	99.84	ok
1008	6,899,051	6,902,737	99.95	ok
1007	6,904,133	6,906,499	99.97	ok
1006	6,818,679	6,895,769	98.88	ok
1005	6,897,664	6,902,008	99.94	ok
1004	6,890,853	6,897,066	99.91	ok
1003	6,822,314	6,849,188	99.61	ok
1002	6,853,820	6,871,283	99.75	ok
1001	6,905,798	6,907,616	99.97	ok
1000	6,906,797	6,908,351	99.98	ok
999	6,895,290	6,900,104	99.93	ok
998	6,841,301	6,888,575	99.31	ok
997	6,884,010	6,892,183	99.88	ok
996	6,890,397	6,896,725	99.91	ok
995	6,888,579	6,895,595	99.90	ok
994	6,888,212	6,894,408	99.91	ok
993	6,892,476	6,898,358	99.91	ok
992	6,886,775	6,894,178	99.89	ok
991	6,906,516	6,907,940	99.98	ok
990	6,906,281	6,907,598	99.98	ok
989	6,902,283	6,905,044	99.96	ok
988	6,822,633	6,901,313	98.86	ok
987	6,878,420	6,888,593	99.85	ok
986	6,636,935	6,897,842	96.22	ok
985	6,833,689	6,896,918	99.08	ok
984	6,898,798	6,902,695	99.94	ok
983	6,896,758	6,901,341	99.93	ok
982	6,898,669	6,902,857	99.94	ok
981	6,891,940	6,898,155	99.91	ok
980	6,459,098	6,898,627	93.63	below floor
979	6,755,153	6,882,853	98.14	ok
978	6,896,967	6,901,585	99.93	ok
977	6,890,765	6,897,017	99.91	ok
976	6,904,250	6,906,578	99.97	ok
975	6,897,523	6,901,877	99.94	ok
974	4,091,093	6,903,278	59.26	below floor
973	4,093,729	6,901,704	59.31	below floor
972	—	6,905,073	0.00	delinquent
971	—	6,897,817	0.00	delinquent
970	—	6,905,285	0.00	delinquent
969	—	6,906,633	0.00	delinquent
968	—	6,906,471	0.00	delinquent
967	—	6,907,885	0.00	delinquent
966	—	6,906,200	0.00	delinquent
965	—	6,906,566	0.00	delinquent
964	—	6,906,431	0.00	delinquent
963	—	6,903,290	0.00	delinquent
962	—	6,909,171	0.00	delinquent
961	—	6,906,311	0.00	delinquent
960	—	6,903,340	0.00	delinquent
959	—	6,906,182	0.00	delinquent
958	—	6,785,220	0.00	delinquent
957	—	6,853,194	0.00	delinquent
956	—	6,907,074	0.00	delinquent
955	—	6,898,789	0.00	delinquent
954	—	6,891,971	0.00	delinquent
953	—	6,904,268	0.00	delinquent

Testnet

% of credits achievable · last 62 epochs · axis 0.0–100.0%10 below floor

View as table

Epoch	Credits	Achievable	%	Status
1007	6,679,903	6,835,225	97.73	ok
1006	6,859,604	6,874,969	99.78	ok
1005	6,851,094	6,869,023	99.74	ok
1004	6,744,356	6,861,901	98.29	ok
1003	6,803,075	6,835,770	99.52	ok
1002	6,648,726	6,852,024	97.03	ok
1001	5,231,376	6,770,625	77.27	ok
1000	6,695,876	6,843,544	97.84	ok
999	6,701,467	6,853,110	97.79	ok
998	6,646,188	6,824,300	97.39	ok
997	6,650,970	6,842,615	97.20	ok
996	6,541,724	6,789,156	96.36	ok
995	6,454,342	6,704,424	96.27	ok
994	6,324,427	6,620,829	95.52	ok
993	2,236,815	5,685,718	39.34	below floor
992	6,782,144	6,884,871	98.51	ok
991	6,729,026	6,870,333	97.94	ok
990	6,674,160	6,829,860	97.72	ok
989	6,738,482	6,839,925	98.52	ok
988	6,804,783	6,835,622	99.55	ok
987	6,810,852	6,840,589	99.57	ok
986	6,764,654	6,810,266	99.33	ok
985	6,654,946	6,745,857	98.65	ok
984	6,738,504	6,782,899	99.35	ok
983	6,804,133	6,830,493	99.61	ok
982	6,807,894	6,839,992	99.53	ok
981	6,825,999	6,844,393	99.73	ok
980	6,821,617	6,842,377	99.70	ok
979	3,279,329	6,639,567	49.39	below floor
978	0	6,665,380	0.00	below floor
977	0	6,531,416	0.00	below floor
976	0	6,676,817	0.00	below floor
975	0	6,621,545	0.00	below floor
974	3,474,431	5,925,622	58.63	below floor
973	5,310,647	5,746,144	92.42	ok
972	6,626,571	6,706,897	98.80	ok
971	6,454,223	6,595,271	97.86	ok
970	6,231,023	6,427,745	96.94	ok
969	6,262,596	6,451,011	97.08	ok
968	6,163,331	6,378,514	96.63	ok
967	6,431,085	6,592,724	97.55	ok
966	6,447,490	6,578,393	98.01	ok
965	6,482,637	6,611,581	98.05	ok
964	6,517,944	6,631,311	98.29	ok
961	6,614,789	6,700,972	98.71	ok
960	6,377,174	6,547,512	97.40	ok
959	6,604,804	6,710,957	98.42	ok
958	6,642,921	6,721,297	98.83	ok
957	6,580,920	6,677,400	98.56	ok
956	6,753,588	6,805,541	99.24	ok
955	6,757,110	6,802,733	99.33	ok
954	6,654,494	6,730,197	98.88	ok
953	6,730,753	6,783,617	99.22	ok
952	6,704,594	6,765,499	99.10	ok
951	6,603,058	6,696,601	98.60	ok
950	6,629,403	6,714,106	98.74	ok
949	6,544,918	6,652,262	98.39	ok
948	6,334,374	6,504,687	97.38	ok
947	2,768,776	6,482,919	42.71	below floor
946	0	6,613,021	0.00	below floor
945	4,071,568	6,608,966	61.61	below floor
944	6,611,967	6,708,211	98.57	ok