Aursen

Approvedmainnet-beta + testnetonboarded epoch 974 · 19 May 2026KYC kyc valid

In the program and receiving mainnet-beta delegation. Also runs testnet — that is mandatory, not optional.

Mainnet-beta vote account: AurseT3W3tk1dATBWAXtWR6oubBgECqintfcvP74teU3AurseT3W…vP74teU3
Testnet vote account: AurE3hQm3DoG9Er3qmwFSxuK2Pn9XgoEiozpZZthk7sQAurE3hQm…ZZthk7sQ

Compliance, per cluster

Each criterion below compares a measured value against the threshold the program published for that cluster and epoch. The dashed line is the limit; the bar is the measurement. Nothing here is hardcoded: change the epoch and the limits move.

Mainnet-beta

epoch 1016BONUS

10 passingTokyo, JP · AS210162

Vote credits

6,890,592 (101.21% of avg)PASS

≥ 97% of the cluster's 5-epoch averagelimit 6,604,084 (97%)

Skip rate (5 epoch)

0.06%PASS

≤ 5% of assigned leader slots skippedlimit 5%

Commission

0%PASS

≤ 5%limit 5%

Commission integrity

cleanPASS

no commission rugrequired clean

MEV commission

10%PASS

≤ 10%limit 10%

Agave version

4.2.0PASS

≥ 4.2.0-rc.1required 4.2.0-rc.1

Datacenter concentration

13.350%PASS

≤ 15% of cluster stake in your datacenterlimit 15%

Provider concentration

13.350%PASS

≤ 25% of cluster stake with your providerlimit 25%

Network (ASN)

AS210162 · UAB Cherry ServersPASS

not on the blocked listrequired blocked: AS283232, AS283231

Testnet participation

10 of 10PASS

≥ 5 of the last 10 testnet epochs at Baseline or betterlimit 5 of 10

Activated stake: 357.9K SOL
Foundation stake: 82.3K SOL
Vote credits: 6,890,592
Client: 4.2.0

Testnet

epoch 1007BONUS

7 passing1 failingChicago, US · AS204770

Vote credits

6,797,406 (130.17% of avg)PASS

≥ 85% of the cluster's 5-epoch averagelimit 4,438,633 (85%)

Skip rate (5 epoch)

0.31%PASS

≤ 40% of assigned leader slots skippedlimit 40%

Commission

0%PASS

≤ 100%limit 100%

Commission integrity

rug detectedFAIL

no commission rugrequired clean

Agave version

4.2.0-rc.1PASS

≥ 4.2.0-rc.0required 4.2.0-rc.0

Datacenter concentration

13.313%PASS

≤ 100% of cluster stake in your datacenterlimit 100%

Provider concentration

13.313%PASS

≤ 100% of cluster stake with your providerlimit 100%

Network (ASN)

AS204770 · UAB Cherry ServersPASS

not on the blocked listrequired blocked: AS283232, AS283231

Activated stake: 395.4K SOL
Foundation stake: 288.6K SOL
Vote credits: 6,797,406
Client: 4.2.0-rc.1

Program grade history

The grade the program assigned for each epoch it assessed. Bonus met the higher bar that earns additional stake; Baseline met the requirement without it; Nonemeans the epoch’s requirements were not met. An epoch with no grade at all was not assessed: it counts as neither pass nor fail, and renders as an empty track. Select a tile to read that epoch’s detail, including the failure reason where the program published one.

Bonus: passed, full-height bar
Baseline: passed, 60% bar
Not met (None): failed, low bar
Not graded: not assessed, empty track

Mainnet-beta

epochs 974–1016 · 43 graded · 16 Bonus · 0 Baseline · 27 None · 0 not graded

Bonus, last 10: 7/10
Bonus, last 13: 53.8%
Bonus, all epochs: 37.21%
Bonus or Baseline: 37.21%
Vote credit score: 0.681
Avg skip rate: 0%

The program’s own figures, as published, not derived by this site.

epochs 977–1016 of 974–1016

epoch 1016 · ~12 Aug 2026 · Bonus

Met the higher bonus bar for this epoch.

epoch 974 · 19 May 2026epoch 1016 · ~12 Aug 2026

Failed epochs27

Show all 27 failed epochs

epoch 1009 · ~29 Jul 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 1008 · ~27 Jul 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 1007 · 25 Jul 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 1006 · ~22 Jul 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 1005 · 20 Jul 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 1004 · 18 Jul 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 1003 · 16 Jul 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 1002 · 14 Jul 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 1001 · 12 Jul 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 1000 · ~10 Jul 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 999 · 08 Jul 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 998 · 06 Jul 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 997 · 04 Jul 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 996 · ~02 Jul 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 995 · ~30 Jun 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 994 · ~28 Jun 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 993 · ~26 Jun 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 992 · ~24 Jun 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 991 · ~22 Jun 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 990 · 20 Jun 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 989 · ~18 Jun 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 988 · 16 Jun 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 987 · ~14 Jun 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 986 · ~12 Jun 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 985 · ~10 Jun 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 984 · ~08 Jun 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)
epoch 983 · 06 Jun 2026: Testnet history insufficient (INELIGIBILE_TESTNET_HISTORY)

Testnet

epochs 964–1007 · 44 graded · 20 Bonus · 0 Baseline · 24 None · 0 not graded

Bonus, last 10: 10/10
Bonus, last 13: 100.0%
Bonus, all epochs: 45.45%
Bonus or Baseline: 45.45%
Vote credit score: 0.451
Avg skip rate: 0.06%

The program’s own figures, as published, not derived by this site.

epochs 968–1007 of 964–1007

epoch 1007 · ~18 Aug 2026 · Bonus

Met the higher bonus bar for this epoch.

epoch 964 · 26 May 2026epoch 1007 · ~18 Aug 2026

Failed epochs24

Show all 24 failed epochs

epoch 992 · ~19 Jul 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 991 · 17 Jul 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 990 · ~15 Jul 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 989 · 13 Jul 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 988 · ~11 Jul 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 987 · ~09 Jul 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 986 · 07 Jul 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 985 · ~05 Jul 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 984 · ~03 Jul 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 983 · ~01 Jul 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 982 · ~30 Jun 2026: Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 981 · ~28 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 980 · 26 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 979 · ~24 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 978 · ~22 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION)
epoch 977 · ~20 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION)
epoch 973 · ~12 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 972 · ~10 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 971 · 08 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION) · Vote credits below floor (LOW_CREDITS)
epoch 970 · ~06 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION)
epoch 969 · 04 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION)
epoch 968 · 02 Jun 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION)
epoch 967 · 31 May 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION)
epoch 966 · ~29 May 2026: Client version not eligible (INELIGIBLE_VERSION)

The program graded this validator before its recorded join date, so it was taking part earlier than that date implies. No earlier join date is published, so the graded span is the only evidence of when participation began.

“Graded span” is the first and last epoch the program published a grade for. For a validator no longer participating, the last graded epoch is strong evidence of when that ended, but the program states no exit date, so none is claimed here. Dates prefixed ~ are interpolated between known epoch boundaries.

Failure reasons are the program’s own machine-readable codes, collected by this site into a committed file; collection is still running, and the program published no reasons at all for most failures before roughly epoch 600. An unexplained failed epoch is still a failed epoch.

Build time

Median time the leader took to build a block on mainnet-beta, from IBRL, not from the Solana Foundation: the program publishes no measure of block building at all, so this is one of two figures here that are not its own, alongside Trillium slot duration.

Source

IBRL build time450 Trillium slot duration449

two different measurements, not two readings of one number

Mainnet-beta

epochs 1008–1017 ·IBRL

411.0 ms

epoch 1017 median, per block built

411 TO 425MS

Dashed lines: 410ms and 426ms. This site’s cut points, published by neither IBRL nor Trillium: IBRL bands no build time, and Trillium never measured it. They are the slot-duration marks, reused so the scale holds when you switch source. Neither is a Solana Foundation limit.

range 411.0 to 423.0ms · observed across this window: the last 5 readings sit within 1ms of the first 5

Where this comes from

Each epoch’s figure is IBRL’s own median_block_build_msfor that epoch, stored exactly as published, and the headline is the newest of them rather than an average: IBRL publishes no multi-epoch aggregate, and a mean of ten medians would be this site’s arithmetic wearing IBRL’s name. The 410ms and 426ms lines are this site’s cut points and belong to neither vendor: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured build time at all. They are the marks the slot-duration scale uses, reused here because both distributions sit in the same range, so switching source does not move the scale.

The Solana Foundation publishes no measure of block building and sets no such limit: its per-epoch endpoint carries 29 fields and not one of them is about how a block was built. Nothing here counts toward the program’s grades. Read from a snapshot committed to this repository, taken 2026-08-18 04:15:38 UTC, covering 450 validators on mainnet-beta. Nothing is fetched while this page renders.

The other source measures something else. Switching it changes the quantity on the axis, not the vendor reading one quantity: across the validators carrying both, slot duration and block build time correlate at 0.57, half of them differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Coverage differs too, so a validator can carry a figure under one source and none under the other.

Vote credit history

The last 64 epochs on each cluster, as a share of the credits achievable that epoch. The dashed line is the program’s floor converted to that same measure, so the two are genuinely comparable. Each axis is zoomed to its own data, with its range stated beneath the plot.

Mainnet-beta

% of credits achievable · last 64 epochs · axis 0.0–100.0%21 below floor20 delinquent

View as table

Epoch	Credits	Achievable	%	Status
1016	6,890,592	6,901,890	99.84	ok
1015	6,868,351	6,880,236	99.83	ok
1014	6,907,423	6,908,643	99.98	ok
1013	6,904,493	6,906,603	99.97	ok
1012	6,900,642	6,903,865	99.95	ok
1011	6,886,794	6,894,181	99.89	ok
1010	6,887,483	6,894,735	99.89	ok
1009	6,875,015	6,886,019	99.84	ok
1008	6,899,078	6,902,737	99.95	ok
1007	6,904,511	6,906,499	99.97	ok
1006	6,888,913	6,895,769	99.90	ok
1005	6,898,031	6,902,008	99.94	ok
1004	6,891,248	6,897,066	99.92	ok
1003	6,822,758	6,849,188	99.61	ok
1002	6,854,242	6,871,283	99.75	ok
1001	6,906,136	6,907,616	99.98	ok
1000	6,907,076	6,908,351	99.98	ok
999	6,889,499	6,900,104	99.85	ok
998	6,879,093	6,888,575	99.86	ok
997	6,884,349	6,892,183	99.89	ok
996	6,890,621	6,896,725	99.91	ok
995	6,881,778	6,895,595	99.80	ok
994	6,888,389	6,894,408	99.91	ok
993	6,893,018	6,898,358	99.92	ok
992	6,887,077	6,894,178	99.90	ok
991	6,906,830	6,907,940	99.98	ok
990	6,906,134	6,907,598	99.98	ok
989	6,902,528	6,905,044	99.96	ok
988	6,890,897	6,901,313	99.85	ok
987	6,872,691	6,888,593	99.77	ok
986	6,892,243	6,897,842	99.92	ok
985	6,884,159	6,896,918	99.82	ok
984	6,898,517	6,902,695	99.94	ok
983	6,896,465	6,901,341	99.93	ok
982	6,898,333	6,902,857	99.93	ok
981	6,891,720	6,898,155	99.91	ok
980	6,892,352	6,898,627	99.91	ok
979	6,869,855	6,882,853	99.81	ok
978	6,896,625	6,901,585	99.93	ok
977	6,890,495	6,897,017	99.91	ok
976	6,904,271	6,906,578	99.97	ok
975	6,897,699	6,901,877	99.94	ok
974	6,899,439	6,903,278	99.94	ok
973	4,532,690	6,901,704	65.67	below floor
972	—	6,905,073	0.00	delinquent
971	—	6,897,817	0.00	delinquent
970	—	6,905,285	0.00	delinquent
969	—	6,906,633	0.00	delinquent
968	—	6,906,471	0.00	delinquent
967	—	6,907,885	0.00	delinquent
966	—	6,906,200	0.00	delinquent
965	—	6,906,566	0.00	delinquent
964	—	6,906,431	0.00	delinquent
963	—	6,903,290	0.00	delinquent
962	—	6,909,171	0.00	delinquent
961	—	6,906,311	0.00	delinquent
960	—	6,903,340	0.00	delinquent
959	—	6,906,182	0.00	delinquent
958	—	6,785,220	0.00	delinquent
957	—	6,853,194	0.00	delinquent
956	—	6,907,074	0.00	delinquent
955	—	6,898,789	0.00	delinquent
954	—	6,891,971	0.00	delinquent
953	—	6,904,268	0.00	delinquent

Testnet

% of credits achievable · last 62 epochs · axis 0.0–100.0%35 below floor18 delinquent

View as table

Epoch	Credits	Achievable	%	Status
1007	6,797,406	6,835,225	99.45	ok
1006	6,853,138	6,874,969	99.68	ok
1005	6,836,503	6,869,023	99.53	ok
1004	6,834,321	6,861,901	99.60	ok
1003	6,791,713	6,835,770	99.36	ok
1002	6,818,972	6,852,024	99.52	ok
1001	6,703,595	6,770,625	99.01	ok
1000	6,801,676	6,843,544	99.39	ok
999	6,820,872	6,853,110	99.53	ok
998	6,779,297	6,824,300	99.34	ok
997	6,803,579	6,842,615	99.43	ok
996	6,700,368	6,789,156	98.69	ok
995	6,610,598	6,704,424	98.60	ok
994	6,483,504	6,620,829	97.93	ok
993	4,676,428	5,685,718	82.25	ok
992	2,382,120	6,884,871	34.60	below floor
991	2,385,217	6,870,333	34.72	below floor
990	1,630,772	6,829,860	23.88	below floor
989	0	6,839,925	0.00	below floor
988	0	6,835,622	0.00	below floor
987	0	6,840,589	0.00	below floor
986	0	6,810,266	0.00	below floor
985	0	6,745,857	0.00	below floor
984	0	6,782,899	0.00	below floor
983	0	6,830,493	0.00	below floor
982	771,564	6,839,992	11.28	below floor
981	2,060,467	6,844,393	30.10	below floor
980	2,105,060	6,842,377	30.77	below floor
979	2,303,425	6,639,567	34.69	below floor
978	6,565,690	6,665,380	98.50	ok
977	6,327,893	6,531,416	96.88	ok
976	6,574,540	6,676,817	98.47	ok
975	6,497,688	6,621,545	98.13	ok
974	5,175,536	5,925,622	87.34	ok
973	4,065,055	5,746,144	70.74	below floor
972	0	6,706,897	0.00	below floor
971	16	6,595,271	0.00	below floor
970	6,228,642	6,427,745	96.90	ok
969	6,259,983	6,451,011	97.04	ok
968	6,150,756	6,378,514	96.43	ok
967	6,455,101	6,592,724	97.91	ok
966	6,439,795	6,578,393	97.89	ok
965	6,486,967	6,611,581	98.12	ok
964	6,515,893	6,631,311	98.26	ok
961	—	6,700,972	0.00	delinquent
960	—	6,547,512	0.00	delinquent
959	—	6,710,957	0.00	delinquent
958	—	6,721,297	0.00	delinquent
957	—	6,677,400	0.00	delinquent
956	—	6,805,541	0.00	delinquent
955	—	6,802,733	0.00	delinquent
954	—	6,730,197	0.00	delinquent
953	—	6,783,617	0.00	delinquent
952	—	6,765,499	0.00	delinquent
951	—	6,696,601	0.00	delinquent
950	—	6,714,106	0.00	delinquent
949	—	6,652,262	0.00	delinquent
948	—	6,504,687	0.00	delinquent
947	—	6,482,919	0.00	delinquent
946	—	6,613,021	0.00	delinquent
945	—	6,608,966	0.00	delinquent
944	—	6,708,211	0.00	delinquent