Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
6,985
of 10,966 on record · 2 departed
Combined
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
88.4%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Departed
2
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 88.3% · T testnet 88.4%

Rejected SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, mean wall-clock duration of a slot, over ten epochs, published by Trillium, and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanTrilliumSlot timeIBRLScore
KOLO, Rejected68Sz…zG3ymainnettestnet
Kombinik, RejectedHsb1…EY7Vmainnettestnet
Komorebi, Rejectedkom1…WknEmainnettestnet370ms98.3
Konstantin, Rejected2ABH…WSAymainnettestnet
KonstanzM, RejectedDbHd…cEySmainnettestnet
kopone, Rejected9eo8…wHDymainnettestnet
Koralama, RejectedEcs6…QBaGmainnettestnet
korenev, RejectedEkSC…mARzmainnettestnet
Korney, RejectedFnE1…j2bMmainnettestnet
Koro, Rejected6YXp…4zoJmainnettestnet
Kos, Rejected2mKE…TdPemainnettestnet
koshelek.ru validator, Rejected7eex…bM2xmainnettestnet
Kosher, Rejected5KWX…BgU7mainnettestnet
Kot Prefect #1, Rejectedkot6…qrMQmainnettestnet
kotofey, Rejected3Yns…KNZzmainnettestnet
Kotofix 0%, RejectedF5Ng…HQTCmainnettestnet
kotsiba, Rejected6Fzv…9Qn7mainnettestnet
Kova, Rejected5KxS…2Yjpmainnettestnet
Kraft K, RejectedCQic…6dCmmainnettestnet
Kripto, Rejected9SUf…FxVgmainnettestnet
Kropotk1n, Rejected55TH…rFdEmainnettestnet
kryptokedi, Rejected4emt…kAfgmainnettestnet
Kseniya, Rejected8i6d…TTDqmainnettestnet
KST, RejectedKSTg…6j9Smainnettestnet
Ksyu, Rejected4SyW…YVoPmainnettestnet
Kudesnik-Testnet, Rejected2xKf…scommainnettestnet
Kukis Global 2, RejectedBM3H…g2itmainnettestnet
KURASH, RejectedBhcJ…rjy1mainnettestnet
Kuza, RejectedHVVj…jzEvmainnettestnet
kylie, RejectedECUL…7GjWmainnettestnet
kytzu, Rejected3fA6…YfCwmainnettestnet
KZPool, Rejected3vYP…cLx3mainnettestnet
l13onfire, RejectedERfs…ctbymainnettestnet
lab331, RejectedHunz…Q1kBmainnettestnet
LaBozi, Rejected7go5…iUwGmainnettestnet
LadySun, Rejected6npq…ro3dmainnettestnet
LaLaLady, Rejected5QYU…CL6Umainnettestnet
Lambo Stake, Rejected9UJg…fFyCmainnettestnet
Lambo Stake 🚀 Jito MEV 🔥 0% Fee, RejectedDsoR…UQYwmainnettestnet
Lamze, Rejectedmo3y…N2NZmainnettestnet
Lanax, Rejected6UvA…ZqcKmainnettestnet
Latin Node, Rejected4miW…zb7amainnettestnet
launoosku, Rejected81zN…B6b3mainnettestnet
Laura, Rejected35Zj…snH1mainnettestnet
lavandos, RejectedCfFx…yt1qmainnettestnet
Laz Validator Node, RejectedEqSy…JUF4mainnettestnet
lazurit, Rejected9g4X…ctavmainnettestnet
Lebed, Rejected9of5…qcCRmainnettestnet
Lefa Jan, RejectedA1Ms…8w2Cmainnettestnet
Legiojuve, Rejected4Jry…1rJYmainnettestnet
LEGNUM, Rejected21RE…Zq1Vmainnettestnet
lelika, Rejected8Gr5…yrmamainnettestnet
Lemanpay, RejectedCDGn…ABLVmainnettestnet
Lena Krasa, RejectedAGGy…yYCCmainnettestnet
lenght, RejectedAfiv…j5NTmainnettestnet
Lenskii, Rejected25an…WGYbmainnettestnet
LENSTEP 🐱, RejectedFySN…vmY8mainnettestnet
lenta, RejectedHLhn…yg4kmainnettestnet
LEO, Rejected57PD…D29fmainnettestnet
Leodar, Rejected9Agr…5xfWmainnettestnet
Leodar, RejectedHawj…282tmainnettestnet
Leon, Rejected5kjG…pwRumainnettestnet
Leorich, RejectedGs3U…eNi2mainnettestnet
LeQuack, RejectedDYVa…pK24mainnettestnet
Lera, RejectedCnFF…iwn5mainnettestnet
Lerus, Rejected9tnY…Qedamainnettestnet
Leshas, RejectedBEkn…rdcmmainnettestnet
Lesya, RejectedBx6R…3c7Emainnettestnet
Let's Node, Rejected8A4E…R9ibmainnettestnet
Lewa, Rejected4WAu…Ng3Umainnettestnet
Lex Tur, Rejectede6ED…gsfJmainnettestnet
Lex_Prime, RejectedAHRT…jMVomainnettestnet
LGenny, RejectedFVmo…ES1bmainnettestnet
Lia, Rejected6Zzw…ev7Cmainnettestnet
LigaLend, RejectedidLi…WJ45mainnettestnet
Light, RejectedFGF3…bHspmainnettestnet
Light Solana!, RejectedBDJi…iRygmainnettestnet
Light Zoom, RejectedFTWu…WUkMmainnettestnet
lightbulb, RejectedFegP…63Svmainnettestnet
Lightning strike, RejectedAcrA…6zYTmainnettestnet
LightStaking, RejectedDgwc…wJHpmainnettestnet
LIK3minem, Rejected54SN…LNGgmainnettestnet
LIKE Pool, Rejected9SjG…Ms5Emainnettestnet
Likkkey, Rejected9EuV…UxEAmainnettestnet
Link, RejectedFJJU…BWpymainnettestnet
Lion3d | 0% Forever + Block Rewards Sharing, RejectedCVva…L4Cmmainnettestnet377ms93.8
LIONODER 🦁, Rejected5X39…95YLmainnettestnet
lisk1s87, RejectedVBe6…KWphmainnettestnet
littlebets, RejectedEheH…3WSVmainnettestnet
Litx - 0% Commission, RejectedLitx…jZwEmainnettestnet417ms95.1
Lizon, Rejected6vwv…uS83mainnettestnet
lkkroot, Rejected5AYc…hbbrmainnettestnet
lllwOn, RejectedGooE…MFVHmainnettestnet
lofsigma, RejectedAPCr…DfQomainnettestnet
Loggy, RejectedD8cg…c6hHmainnettestnet
LOL, Rejected2U8i…JqiWmainnettestnet
lol66, Rejected2nZo…Qkiymainnettestnet
London, RejectedFmgq…zuZ3mainnettestnet
LongLog, RejectedGcSQ…hFoQmainnettestnet
lookatme, RejectedEVkR…2sxLmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Slot time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerTrillium’s own boundary, not this site’s: 410ms is where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 2 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.