Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
3V3pMm…aZMGGymainnettestnet
3vfh59…SPZSBwmainnettestnet
3W4z6b…CBnjZRmainnettestnet
3WcDo2…oH9QbVmainnettestnet
3wekCL…Bib1womainnettestnet
3WFvZu…zcV1Ggmainnettestnet
3Whgfb…m4Wetfmainnettestnet
3WVyvT…y71nudmainnettestnet
3X6Dfs…dUQFEYmainnettestnet
3X8bsZ…Ak9o6emainnettestnet
3XCznF…FWBrpmmainnettestnet
3Xh2pW…QfQc9Ymainnettestnet
3xH4qe…YmJWmSmainnettestnet
3xhsQs…8LCDELmainnettestnet
3xhsy1…Vj4wW3mainnettestnet
3xQAYV…Bf6eJhmainnettestnet
3XutQe…L4rbipmainnettestnet
3xwAUG…msmj5Pmainnettestnet
3XYpu6…MFD7JHmainnettestnet
3xYrPK…GGf2aDmainnettestnet
3YC79f…YonNcEmainnettestnet
3ydLHQ…yHpi4vmainnettestnet
3yJwmD…r1YexKmainnettestnet
3YsGUL…CEm6V6mainnettestnet
3YxdnW…RVfhRamainnettestnet
3YzYe1…PFS9womainnettestnet
3Z2fp6…sXqzcMmainnettestnet
3z3HU2…GDoJtBmainnettestnet
3z4y6M…pdXh5Bmainnettestnet
3ZaBRv…DM6q2gmainnettestnet
3ZaFDY…Z7YxBCmainnettestnet
3ZBQaC…s6f6nzmainnettestnet
3ZYGUK…nWeHdjmainnettestnet
41hWbr…bUkYzcmainnettestnet
41iM1Z…uEemvEmainnettestnet
41nT3r…aFiqZZmainnettestnet
41wEa9…tPrVAFmainnettestnet
42a14c…kdeE9jmainnettestnet
42QRTQ…sJ1TP2mainnettestnet
43C2Yb…HxDA48mainnettestnet
43t4Yb…HMSFfAmainnettestnet
43WJ4E…oWhUQimainnettestnet
448jZZ…8VX4Mymainnettestnet
44eYGt…88Yspsmainnettestnet
44iALa…cMhZGcmainnettestnet
45BMpW…dDyiGXmainnettestnet
466s9T…L1kNSTmainnettestnet
46aiAN…q1mQ5Qmainnettestnet
46fbxb…3LwRU7mainnettestnet
46TR4j…d8nDYWmainnettestnet
46VrJB…wfBaTTmainnettestnet
46wXwH…VJURLMmainnettestnet
46xCNv…DfQV6Wmainnettestnet
47kJpv…jrcUcBmainnettestnet
48ewrc…6a1cxomainnettestnet
48PER7…pFSCcXmainnettestnet
4AHnQQ…ATTRhmmainnettestnet
4aLPx8…X87ioomainnettestnet
4aN4iN…nmDWTimainnettestnet
4AzFEa…LGBavMmainnettestnet
4BevYS…Dfz1FEmainnettestnet
4bkgJW…gZjtNVmainnettestnet
4BmBTR…gamsujmainnettestnet
4BozhN…J7pfSymainnettestnet
4c3Vzg…YhtH8kmainnettestnet
4C858h…snLuvqmainnettestnet
4CjMDz…Vq2kWzmainnettestnet
4cjYcv…3k1kCRmainnettestnet
4ctxLP…NbafmGmainnettestnet
4CxCyp…RRoXeGmainnettestnet
4drumR…GnH61Gmainnettestnet
4DVjux…mn3s54mainnettestnet
4dzpNW…9HRXxfmainnettestnet
4eE1yZ…6mShokmainnettestnet
4Eoeqs…uPxdnymainnettestnet
4ESecX…bTqBbnmainnettestnet
4EStjr…kHpEwKmainnettestnet
4FJxwi…qkj7mwmainnettestnet
4fNy1S…rY6fcomainnettestnet
4fosCz…MZ8WXmmainnettestnet
4FRcSH…Rcfc7Mmainnettestnet
4fUfT2…Duecppmainnettestnet
4g7XH9…aWdRaNmainnettestnet
4gGdpj…cBb84Hmainnettestnet
4gMVis…3VoSGwmainnettestnet
4gvs8N…SLz9qzmainnettestnet
4gZgn6…cMw9BZmainnettestnet
4GZQzy…xZcxBfmainnettestnet
4h8Kgg…eBK4ekmainnettestnet
4hfjU5…TzWEVWmainnettestnet
4hrPFf…8i8M5Kmainnettestnet
4HrwHn…YhSeDjmainnettestnet
4Hw2WP…GGjKqdmainnettestnet
4HyD2G…Fh2Gyamainnettestnet
4i96o1…FUBvnhmainnettestnet
4iAdJb…6hxZMjmainnettestnet
4iCtMU…HPd5Fpmainnettestnet
4iUtYK…158Dbsmainnettestnet
4J1M39…vX7PAXmainnettestnet
4JTEKM…yDRLuWmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.