Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
6,985
of 10,966 on record · 2 departed
Combined
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
88.4%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Departed
2
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 88.3% · T testnet 88.4%

Rejected SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
Isayk, RejectedG4Hn…meEBmainnettestnet
Ishtar, Rejected9Xm2…T1Z9mainnettestnet
isillien, RejectedDoha…EDV7mainnettestnet
Isla Validator, RejectedBmAb…KNSpmainnettestnet
Islam, RejectedHkPo…eh57mainnettestnet
Ismagil, RejectedZjat…rsjZmainnettestnet
ITJulia 💚 0% fee + MEV!, RejectedAfyV…ocxUmainnettestnet
itsys4, Rejected4d1Z…LG2Lmainnettestnet
IuKni, Rejected7X1k…nDAgmainnettestnet
ivan, RejectedEyHu…JSBRmainnettestnet
Ivan Korshakov, RejectedHtph…NGdAmainnettestnet
Ivane, RejectedAauS…N9kNmainnettestnet
iveber, Rejected5vaL…FKVzmainnettestnet
IvIoPkoBka, RejectedHfTv…aqQ6mainnettestnet
iX, Rejected9oJD…upVrmainnettestnet
Iza, RejectedEhpr…KdHzmainnettestnet
J.Green, Rejectedjgrs…v1nJmainnettestnet
jackson, RejectedBrk6…XDmamainnettestnet
Jaga + MEV%, Rejected3fcs…v2WRmainnettestnet
Jagon, RejecteddEkj…zU6Pmainnettestnet
Jaguar, Rejected4J1r…sgNfmainnettestnet
jal-testnet, Rejected3r3E…XWrgmainnettestnet
janliam, RejectedGfCN…LFW6mainnettestnet
jasonmason67, Rejected3zxt…tXFbmainnettestnet
Jasper Staking, RejectedH57w…pc7ymainnettestnet
Jaymandai, Rejected9bLE…vLWomainnettestnet
jd-testnet , RejectedGeLH…XTbnmainnettestnet
jdr, RejectedjdrR…dm7Fmainnettestnet
Jeane, Rejected4G5S…ka31mainnettestnet
JellyGween, RejectedF4PT…JQTmmainnettestnet
Jiradi, Rejected6zxk…nJW3mainnettestnet
jjwoods, RejectedCcHW…JGRqmainnettestnet
JM, RejectedEQhT…M44Wmainnettestnet407ms96.0
John, Rejected5zZi…Lquimainnettestnet
JOHNEE, RejectedBsvt…CwY3mainnettestnet
jok-testnet, RejectedH6fM…UmJXmainnettestnet
Joker, RejectedJoke…KPNcmainnettestnet
JokerD, RejectedCfBJ…Kw4Bmainnettestnet
JokeyKitty, Rejected94Hg…EHwRmainnettestnet
jonees, RejectedDFKj…DiKxmainnettestnet
Jopa Validator, RejectedF2cA…1dqnmainnettestnet
Jorj, Rejected4sKr…q3UTmainnettestnet
Jormungand Labs, RejectedpZ2n…vvUVmainnettestnet
JoyOne Validator, Rejected2DZC…1Fvcmainnettestnet
JP Validator + paladin, RejectedBNHc…bnWWmainnettestnet
JRock, RejectedGxzT…Npg7mainnettestnet
jsn-testnet-webtropia , Rejected3u9D…nqTymainnettestnet
JUL COMP💰, Rejected24nf…kRrumainnettestnet
julai, RejectedE9RZ…uC9Umainnettestnet
juli, RejectedDTwP…u86Hmainnettestnet
Julianna, Rejected7vyd…KRzdmainnettestnet
Julieta, RejectedDkbZ…1z2wmainnettestnet
Jumberi, RejectedDz8v…daoJmainnettestnet
JuraT, Rejected2ifN…18Cbmainnettestnet
Just Steak, Rejected5sax…xat8mainnettestnet
justake, RejectedBVze…7acHmainnettestnet
JustStakeIT, Rejected3L7D…hH6cmainnettestnet
K0RSa, Rejected4Wgs…ymq9mainnettestnet
k4dima, RejectedDGCY…Ewcnmainnettestnet
Kafman, Rejected2EUh…rZEemainnettestnet
kalambyryura, RejectedGyKo…ioHYmainnettestnet
Kalaurinar Return to Hogwarts, RejectedHK71…HG95mainnettestnet
kamila_gate, Rejected8h8Y…DLWsmainnettestnet
kanji, RejectedCQyT…njzkmainnettestnet
Kapecizvelet, Rejected9yY7…PiiNmainnettestnet
Karapet, RejectedHZzE…ceSKmainnettestnet
KarKar 0% FEE + TOP APY + JITO🔥🔥🔥, RejectedCUPr…MX36mainnettestnet
Karl_ambar, Rejected6kfL…82dbmainnettestnet
Kasatka, Rejected5kMJ…MuxEmainnettestnet
KAST, RejectedGkFT…nsgwmainnettestnet407ms95.8
Kate Lomova, Rejected7Nfq…tNxZmainnettestnet
Kate4Stake, RejectedG6Pu…rwd3mainnettestnet
katealmighty, Rejected8vvC…rZLbmainnettestnet
katerina, Rejected87aH…v4xamainnettestnet
Katya, Rejected2pYf…6DA4mainnettestnet
kaz4a, RejectedEyhA…mqbymainnettestnet
KazanMangal, Rejected9B5h…jnhLmainnettestnet
kerak69 💥0% fee + Jito MEV💥, RejectedC1Wa…tNMTmainnettestnet
Keramzit, Rejected4DZq…ga9xmainnettestnet
Ketchup, Rejected3DQY…vEkomainnettestnet
keyone, Rejected8waG…keu3mainnettestnet
khetsu, Rejected51aW…FG4qmainnettestnet
Khinkali | From 🇬🇪 with ❤️, Rejected5A8w…m1ENmainnettestnet
Khunchan, RejectedATd7…kbvzmainnettestnet
Kidze, Rejected2UHh…RRwLmainnettestnet
Kindomof, RejectedHwZx…uA1Zmainnettestnet
kingser-main, RejectedCtsZ…UKoumainnettestnet
KingSol, RejectedDx1V…xavjmainnettestnet
KingSuper, RejectedFLma…wUhAmainnettestnet
Kippaaaa, Rejected7hUW…TvYjmainnettestnet
Kirs, RejectedAnHf…gZDCmainnettestnet
kisslovefun | solana.ing 0% fee +MEV, RejectedA24h…JLRxmainnettestnet
Kitsune 🇯🇵, RejectedEjS9…4Pnjmainnettestnet
Kitty Sniper Solana Bot Node, Rejected3Mu4…5Nesmainnettestnet
Kiwami Validator ⚔️ Paladin, RejectedCtsP…EShsmainnettestnet
Klab, Rejected5Ejm…rco4mainnettestnet
KNDCorp, Rejected2sYT…AViFmainnettestnet
KodSun, Rejected5YuC…BxXNmainnettestnet
kokorin9, Rejected3jCv…2bprmainnettestnet
Kolly, RejectedFjgr…7RC1mainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 2 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.