Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, mean wall-clock duration of a slot, over ten epochs, published by Trillium, and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanTrilliumSlot timeIBRLScore
3EQsqF…UGdu7vmainnettestnet
3ES8qp…JpFBdpmainnettestnet
3exfk7…9DKyEjmainnettestnet
3Ez89U…GQ8U7Tmainnettestnet
3F1opd…PSDUSWmainnettestnet
3F51Cz…EXw8VWmainnettestnet
3fEEcr…83Kd2zmainnettestnet
3FeQJr…q1WrXomainnettestnet
3Fk2AP…oZSZhjmainnettestnet
3fLm36…tHh8Bxmainnettestnet
3fVdyj…kWwUkwmainnettestnet
3G2Vi6…uaqntADepartedmainnet87.2%testnet
3g699z…139xMvmainnettestnet
3ggVAu…v7kTx1mainnettestnet
3giCP8…wDqfUemainnettestnet
3go8Cb…8m36fMmainnettestnet
3GtBCd…KmHSM4mainnettestnet
3GvgBB…ChNBkimainnettestnet
3gz9a7…NCJsjXmainnettestnet
3H44TN…M7Jukemainnettestnet
3hEU34…biB9mYmainnettestnet
3hjrXn…X1vY34mainnettestnet
3hN2KW…KsNDx5mainnettestnet
3Hnkwp…MKknUamainnettestnet
3HqeSv…wiKhH6mainnettestnet
3i6rTt…Wifk5Lmainnettestnet
3iBK8z…EWKHxKmainnettestnet
3iBQGr…bQJyvSmainnettestnet
3iQqh6…y1c9dFmainnettestnet
3iTs59…CDb8fNmainnettestnet
3iyRUA…LhyN8Bmainnettestnet
3jcXr8…ws2Gjhmainnettestnet
3jdfnC…ymtUntmainnettestnet
3jgGXi…mhwdTxmainnettestnet
3Js4N7…shXu6cmainnettestnet
3jU6Ne…Jv5HQJmainnettestnet
3jwVaH…nCoceVmainnettestnet
3jY7X8…KfZGzLmainnettestnet
3k7iRE…CSK5DTmainnettestnet
3kGSX8…XC84r2mainnettestnet
3kk8RD…jKkwnFmainnettestnet
3knwZ4…oBjqK6mainnettestnet
3kTMSN…JPMeGDmainnettestnet
3KY8d8…x17B3smainnettestnet
3LVa7z…Dwt4qbmainnettestnet
3LWQou…pGdqHamainnettestnet
3LyemT…jxhPDwmainnettestnet
3mdurZ…mH8AzSmainnettestnet
3miUjH…nvgZ5cmainnettestnet
3mYP9A…kHjUe9mainnettestnet
3n2TAB…j5muQUmainnettestnet
3N9K3P…HAUQdamainnettestnet
3N9Rqp…BRzeXGmainnettestnet
3na45D…A7vtiamainnettestnet
3NFDCd…xwf8dZmainnettestnet
3nh1L7…CMia8Xmainnettestnet
3Nh7VA…rz9LL1mainnettestnet
3nhgne…aVeK7imainnettestnet
3nJRRK…2j3C4kmainnettestnet
3NM5me…FdgZs4mainnettestnet
3nUXg9…sB9ZE6mainnettestnet
3o4fRG…3u37QXmainnettestnet
3oTUgC…uyAzYwmainnettestnet
3oWVME…y1Sx42mainnettestnet
3P1ztU…K9Yuc1mainnettestnet
3PMUbT…UCKNdBmainnettestnet
3pnYPY…m7P43Dmainnettestnet
3pPCoH…kJuv3omainnettestnet
3PU5Su…fsEv4Mmainnettestnet
3qC2iL…CHqenmmainnettestnet
3QDFqU…MYwfRhmainnettestnet
3QduBT…5Bqw4Emainnettestnet
3QLDc4…eqP85wmainnettestnet
3qLffH…dJ74rumainnettestnet
3Qoc7U…eWG8vymainnettestnet
3QpRbF…HDGD2amainnettestnet
3qtcj9…jZFwmVmainnettestnet
3Qu5Cb…oCmhSamainnettestnet
3R3qHo…XQKSazmainnettestnet
3REriS…EFZjAumainnettestnet
3rhpMT…dEQf18mainnettestnet
3RkkZQ…xd6W75mainnettestnet
3RL2Rr…NHWiy7mainnettestnet
3RNqcV…LGCDtHmainnettestnet
3ry2ZK…dEK7M4mainnettestnet
3RYqmf…hWksGpmainnettestnet
3s4arM…4BzKsxmainnettestnet
3sb12b…EsrxRwmainnettestnet
3SfS22…rshQNRmainnettestnet
3ssY7f…CDWbnKmainnettestnet
3stryH…SAcTK6mainnettestnet
3T2vU3…4dS6RGmainnettestnet
3tQtwj…Mx8cKgmainnettestnet
3tyZxR…VBiPD5mainnettestnet
3u2oU3…4zemkvmainnettestnet
3Uh51Q…sKBmgumainnettestnet
3uKDeq…NcXqyrmainnettestnet
3UmiKi…wBdkv8mainnettestnet
3uqXMi…jaFHBRmainnettestnet
3Uzg6Y…qZBTbCmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Slot time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerTrillium’s own boundary, not this site’s: 410ms is where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.