Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
6,985
of 10,966 on record · 2 departed
Combined
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
88.4%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Departed
2
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 88.3% · T testnet 88.4%

Rejected SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, mean wall-clock duration of a slot, over ten epochs, published by Trillium, and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanTrilliumSlot timeIBRLScore
jSiJKH…uqEMwAmainnettestnet
jt2Co4…RicLNvmainnettestnet
juQfUS…fZF2eumainnettestnet
jZ5gyA…oejvLrmainnettestnet
K8Lcoa…9YZ8u9mainnettestnet
Kaa3BZ…UDt3L8mainnettestnet
KAZCuH…WPWo9Tmainnettestnet
kBXWXk…FfVxaxmainnettestnet
Ke7bHe…EgyA9bmainnettestnet
kGAx6s…gQVL6Gmainnettestnet
KiyxS2…FyGcF7mainnettestnet
KrAfaq…6rWPBBmainnettestnet
KsG1tG…CxPTBBmainnettestnet
kst9TS…PoPjk6mainnettestnet
kuMcyX…Xwz8UQmainnettestnet
KVRYn5…6dMfbXmainnettestnet
KWM2qi…6v9Htomainnettestnet
kYdAuT…GpKd31mainnettestnet
kYu4zc…zcQMKYmainnettestnet
kzuV6e…k4w5Gjmainnettestnet
L5navw…SEwsT9mainnettestnet
L6EGMU…ehuifmmainnettestnet
L7N2qN…LQDtERmainnettestnet
L89YaF…9agm8pmainnettestnet
L9Bbiu…smDNC1mainnettestnet
LevMqz…xhSEZqmainnettestnet
LmYB43…2XU2GUmainnettestnet
LqLszp…WuMeQ1mainnettestnet
LqxY2J…NVu4UMmainnettestnet
Lt8owD…DyR3bBmainnettestnet
LWhx1F…KFP7m5mainnettestnet
LytENd…go8MUgmainnettestnet
m2HiQz…YLtcDUmainnettestnet
M4BYjZ…LEwA5bmainnettestnet
m6Gc7q…3RxxL6mainnettestnet
MadMeg…kjXkxYmainnettestnet
MASmUB…kgRQGMmainnettestnet
mCPPo6…U9PAY2mainnettestnet
mGfDpF…hQ1oM8mainnettestnet
mHtqTQ…T9eLATmainnettestnet
miM1ZW…yM4Nf5mainnettestnet
mprSQd…KvDDANmainnettestnet
Mv2vxC…K8TpMDmainnettestnet
mv3Khn…36BHMDmainnettestnet
mv4FYi…HAopD2mainnettestnet
MVD4FC…zpMWwCmainnettestnet
n5Un4S…PcmjThmainnettestnet
NaHNtT…9ppynimainnettestnet
natHH8…32Fdprmainnettestnet
naxw2E…AwL4P4mainnettestnet
Nb5V9m…7RvQp9mainnettestnet
NcPiN2…cVAuAKmainnettestnet
NCyp57…8jCtTumainnettestnet
Nh1ptU…zYGZc1mainnettestnet
NLS5Vw…fXcDo2mainnettestnet
NmUG3N…YN2VZRmainnettestnet
nsimfX…ar86ZEmainnettestnet
o3a51u…rY8tgvmainnettestnet
okMM71…3MAhoVmainnettestnet
oNF3Cx…GWk3ZDmainnettestnet
orbit1…gEfM5qmainnettestnet
os9sBd…4SVovBmainnettestnet
oT5Cm7…R49sjhmainnettestnet
oTtmAr…ZYpUzPmainnettestnet
owEWUu…duoDcXmainnettestnet
ox22BX…H3G8GQmainnettestnet
oxqzbZ…tymSvDmainnettestnet
P2PPCK…7imT5Nmainnettestnet
P96j9i…8trmU1mainnettestnet
PEgADK…cFjSzYmainnettestnet
PfsdKi…ft2Eyxmainnettestnet
pGUjdS…Argucgmainnettestnet
pkqvfJ…pSk3Zemainnettestnet
PnNXat…zAVNEDmainnettestnet
PPdwxw…YnANTmmainnettestnet
pq1FNh…Wgk3F2mainnettestnet
PR3Gta…MF5N4jmainnettestnet
psiSiA…HuKTY6mainnettestnet
ptoAkP…zFBrWFmainnettestnet
Q4VoDM…BBmBHsmainnettestnet
q7U5by…ktg5bUmainnettestnet
QAp7fP…2953YPmainnettestnet
QbwDWW…5Kv9fHmainnettestnet
QfdQir…PbM6chmainnettestnet
QgX43C…Y6pQUCmainnettestnet
QMUBfT…S3TEDumainnettestnet
QNNRG1…r8w68amainnettestnet
qsjdfN…xP36U5mainnettestnet
QU9yjq…DP2mMMmainnettestnet
qXT4tQ…HGisjdmainnettestnet
Qzn919…v77aDpmainnettestnet
RaVJ3J…jTk4XFmainnettestnet
Rjs3Rx…dvekxbmainnettestnet
Rkcbqo…z3HAeNmainnettestnet
rmnh7A…MJMwZZmainnettestnet
RooKD3…MfAecXmainnettestnet
rReHyT…qNiHihmainnettestnet
rRLKNq…fsBJuBmainnettestnet
s2Meqg…qz3J3vmainnettestnet
S6tsEU…xGVTpxmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Slot time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerTrillium’s own boundary, not this site’s: 410ms is where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 2 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.