Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
6,985
of 10,966 on record · 2 departed
Combined
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
88.4%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Departed
2
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 88.3% · T testnet 88.4%

Rejected SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, mean wall-clock duration of a slot, over ten epochs, published by Trillium, and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanTrilliumSlot timeIBRLScore
H2Gy1n…AFd15dmainnettestnet
H2z7EZ…WwLtd4mainnettestnet
H373ty…caGYDYmainnettestnet
H3gWHd…TQLRYvmainnettestnet
H3pEo5…vQuc4kmainnettestnet
H3q7Jx…WQF63pmainnettestnet
H3qRjW…wFqsEGmainnettestnet
H3tixa…NNL9NRmainnettestnet
H3UHJg…yp73VVmainnettestnet
H3xPJU…sZmotymainnettestnet
H448PP…o8TPNdmainnettestnet
H4e9pd…TR7tt1mainnettestnet
H4Fim8…2y9JYYmainnettestnet
H4gQkN…oyuZ2Jmainnettestnet
H4Vgaq…dTdYeAmainnettestnet
H52Ha1…2iKCxZmainnettestnet
H5EhFX…rfRuFnmainnettestnet
H5i8So…hKt5Jimainnettestnet
H5JawB…cNBchimainnettestnet
H5LRni…TsNF8pmainnettestnet
H5MAyS…vii25hmainnettestnet
H5ri9Q…3JYGNxmainnettestnet
H5ToqK…NkUD2Emainnettestnet
H5x5LQ…PhCG7Xmainnettestnet
H6F15M…PFrxyDmainnettestnet
H6SWKA…MWTRKFmainnettestnet
H6vcfu…3WdCKYmainnettestnet
H7C5ej…Jd3n5Dmainnettestnet
H7kZ7F…292qCmmainnettestnet
H7tzvM…hzt4qamainnettestnet
H81Wsb…74eVXtmainnettestnet
H84fEY…HBM9TJmainnettestnet
H85v6H…cxCiJvmainnettestnet
H8CUFJ…x9DsHdmainnettestnet
H8G3yU…XG5AHJmainnettestnet
H8gY7X…yupUofmainnettestnet
H8NudD…C6PVaHmainnettestnet
H8vSzf…xF6jhSmainnettestnet
H8WiAC…292rsemainnettestnet
H9iUia…awLoj2mainnettestnet
H9Qou4…z3zdsJmainnettestnet
H9tyju…Cpm4cQmainnettestnet
H9xupu…Y2jhb1mainnettestnet
H9Z1C1…hBuo3xmainnettestnet
HAC2L7…baWN8bmainnettestnet
HAcUgu…hRsZRBmainnettestnet
HAHJqT…56w4yvmainnettestnet
Hai9yP…8i5w5Fmainnettestnet
HaiyfR…fRyytmmainnettestnet
HAJHm2…fCAuQVmainnettestnet
HaKCGv…s6NSdbmainnettestnet
HaN995…WYNvYxmainnettestnet
HAnSgk…EM1Audmainnettestnet
HAomcZ…acE78emainnettestnet
HApPge…nENywmmainnettestnet
HAsW1v…ihX8XNmainnettestnet
HaT4o4…b775b9mainnettestnet
HaWT5W…T7QrvFmainnettestnet
HaX4Nj…zvdGXomainnettestnet
Hb9RUY…7FGbBumainnettestnet
HbB4wo…2bmX8Cmainnettestnet
HBbLMU…UvFLEbmainnettestnet
HBfFJC…t6YqbSmainnettestnet
HBjX5i…AW9YGimainnettestnet
HbNRwa…5cDwsSmainnettestnet
HBnWHK…o2Qdwnmainnettestnet
HbQwCg…FMqYRFmainnettestnet
HbrsqA…x832ktmainnettestnet
HbUQPd…mRk9CVmainnettestnet
HbVdQB…NaavVfmainnettestnet
Hbvgbo…sG7Y7xmainnettestnet
HC6xA1…Npwj9emainnettestnet
Hc83Px…QMPq4Fmainnettestnet
HC98MB…46iiKhmainnettestnet
HCbyyx…fnjp32mainnettestnet
HckyAS…2KTR5Dmainnettestnet
HCnK7J…oyGMb4mainnettestnet
HCrP2S…8wW8G2mainnettestnet
HCsQTa…7HrKc2mainnettestnet
HcT7y1…TShzjRmainnettestnet
HcXgG3…nP6AjSmainnettestnet
HcYS3M…APVvUNmainnettestnet
Hd1Gvz…b53jYfmainnettestnet
Hdbj5J…pNHoaQmainnettestnet
HDd1qj…ZbhcFpmainnettestnet
HdE2QE…6L6fA8mainnettestnet
HDfFZf…GNqxKLmainnettestnet
Hdh9MV…rsND5Dmainnettestnet
Hdi37R…xxZWc8mainnettestnet
HDif1a…ZQF2RRmainnettestnet
HdjYjT…ktv7zmmainnettestnet
HDkqAN…VJfuv4mainnettestnet
HdnYek…7As8Lcmainnettestnet
HdQAXP…ySFeCDmainnettestnet
HdqmUd…ZWLtLWmainnettestnet
HdqvcQ…d47KnCmainnettestnet
HDUc1s…fa4whwmainnettestnet
HDVf1H…cruHzhmainnettestnet
HEbc38…26fv95mainnettestnet
HEeAG2…RToYAnmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Slot time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerTrillium’s own boundary, not this site’s: 410ms is where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 2 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.