Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
6,985
of 10,966 on record · 2 departed
Combined
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
88.4%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Departed
2
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 88.3% · T testnet 88.4%

Rejected SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
FzgbdA…8rLDMdmainnettestnet
FzH19L…wDGcVTmainnettestnet
FZJDe5…Bg4XDUmainnettestnet
FzL3Kx…iynmxSmainnettestnet
FZMDdA…mse27vmainnettestnet
FZoq72…hkvHMBmainnettestnet
FzQZdK…EsdbRpmainnettestnet
FZrSKK…d1dG57mainnettestnet
FzvnMz…BFeKQMmainnettestnet
G1ASbu…ngkR3Emainnettestnet
G1bASP…yCKVoHmainnettestnet
G1ikLs…gQLgP1mainnettestnet
G1jAGt…RD2wgemainnettestnet
G282yo…vXh1wUmainnettestnet
G2A2tw…tLAe7Emainnettestnet
G2eC9o…5BPT8nmainnettestnet
G2HZdS…Qq62ekmainnettestnet
G2nqkX…MhNLKPmainnettestnet
G2yPkV…eLJth8mainnettestnet
G3aUD1…LsVdAbmainnettestnet
G3BBL7…BwwzFVmainnettestnet
G3fEuu…cw7F8jmainnettestnet
G3J7wP…AKzpuvmainnettestnet
G3J9Fs…GTYc8zmainnettestnet
G3jdoM…Qqb9iUmainnettestnet
g3qVTp…ByZp3Hmainnettestnet
G3x5eb…Yf6wasmainnettestnet
G3z3j8…ZXurCEmainnettestnet
G3zmWD…7MRbWumainnettestnet
G47ust…6VUhPJmainnettestnet
G4BaMb…irEtvZmainnettestnet
G4DFh1…VwDa1Hmainnettestnet
G4jpL3…s6ZrY2mainnettestnet
G58exZ…FrVqswmainnettestnet
G5gB5w…c73Poimainnettestnet
G5oqmu…NkjtGzmainnettestnet
G5pabU…9b22Ufmainnettestnet
G5rEbY…xXgMx4mainnettestnet
G62UZn…ZHxekymainnettestnet
G63qda…WvNWP5mainnettestnet
G63Zcx…CEc1zjmainnettestnet
G6Kogr…bbhjgLmainnettestnet
G6KtN7…HRVMzhmainnettestnet
G6sEi4…VAWs5Zmainnettestnet
G6uaMo…3hCSaDmainnettestnet
G6x2Me…Hiq2Kkmainnettestnet
G6zXEP…fi1CL4mainnettestnet
G7qCBS…BhPCXvmainnettestnet
G7REKB…bYk94Smainnettestnet
G7tT7u…7UZ5YKmainnettestnet
G7veGv…rUAoSYmainnettestnet
G812FE…T9UqnAmainnettestnet
G8M9Go…hMmphRmainnettestnet
G98hD3…xxd3Bimainnettestnet
G9ag2d…kxAgXBmainnettestnet
G9qsqK…7mD83umainnettestnet
G9sNBU…9Jptwzmainnettestnet
Ga5kVm…h2HRwDmainnettestnet
GaA8hJ…JkUPHqmainnettestnet
GafF2q…SFhAUUmainnettestnet
GaFknj…FWoQYdmainnettestnet
GAGkdg…gvjG1amainnettestnet
GagQoH…GbQHXWmainnettestnet
GAk1hd…cWE7RGmainnettestnet
GaQBx5…5fToMemainnettestnet
GaSWbu…1jk49xmainnettestnet
GAToQC…jLu3B2mainnettestnet
GAvK3B…utopVNmainnettestnet
Gb3uT3…294BAMmainnettestnet
Gbc3Q9…5S3ZCQmainnettestnet
GBcL4S…3BZqqmmainnettestnet
GBDbUV…mmTW54mainnettestnet
GbEV1R…s8BsMEmainnettestnet
GBGW4K…hVExAKmainnettestnet
GBLbXA…ZVbRYnmainnettestnet
gbMjC2…hjSJHpmainnettestnet
GBSAeL…NsckmQmainnettestnet
GBZY3k…VbTVZhmainnettestnet
Gc8Gte…1XNnT5mainnettestnet
Gc8WGg…at1LENmainnettestnet
GCBdbZ…e4pwzymainnettestnet
GcdGkg…TXvqBNmainnettestnet
GCGVQy…VjnKPBmainnettestnet
GCjDno…Z2L39Cmainnettestnet
GcoXrQ…CUfTHvmainnettestnet
GCPcaa…85oSDBmainnettestnet
GCQ4V2…Bpcncdmainnettestnet
GCseyR…yc951wmainnettestnet
GCTFK7…rBaroimainnettestnet
Gcthcv…ELhC9ymainnettestnet
GcyYnz…LiscW5mainnettestnet
GD2QKX…cBFP3bmainnettestnet
Gd33fE…QB3Jwymainnettestnet
GDFJcv…YLpTEnmainnettestnet
GdgpnQ…Lcxfyhmainnettestnet
GDWAxB…E5xNdzmainnettestnet
GdwLVj…sT6HA2mainnettestnet
Ge5nsL…xXHw2Vmainnettestnet
GE94tJ…PTxjmJmainnettestnet
GeanuV…NgfZokmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 2 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.