Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
6,985
of 10,966 on record · 2 departed
Combined
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
88.4%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Departed
2
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 88.3% · T testnet 88.4%

Rejected SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
FPDzex…iyCtZwmainnettestnet
FpF5AZ…ERWoPWmainnettestnet
FpFdBA…BckUbrmainnettestnet
FPsp6G…nHUML6mainnettestnet
FPvNJi…YRExPNmainnettestnet
FPwKd8…nkdLQFmainnettestnet
Fq61u3…wnZmU2mainnettestnet
FQfpMa…mKT1FFmainnettestnet
FQGzbs…nPMHaEmainnettestnet
FqjAu6…AYKJSomainnettestnet
FQjVVf…iPuFqimainnettestnet
FqK8zu…Pr3nnpmainnettestnet
FQt5Bs…2SYgE8mainnettestnet
FqyQzj…vpXN29mainnettestnet
FR5oZd…DgXt4Umainnettestnet
FrbX7B…2qVRU9mainnettestnet
Frdg1N…XPNn1cmainnettestnet
FrEUXk…q955tUmainnettestnet
FrGJHd…hMP5hzmainnettestnet
FRTpZT…smqS87mainnettestnet
FrvBNM…PrRgUAmainnettestnet
FRxuiL…qVuSdgmainnettestnet
FRyg55…Z3uxjmmainnettestnet
FS4GmR…k3zAbqmainnettestnet
Fs7dpr…p9WTJrmainnettestnet
FsBxau…KXrnZSmainnettestnet
FSfQiG…6uet2mmainnettestnet
FSjxJH…beKjL8mainnettestnet
FsnSDE…DRcZvVmainnettestnet
FSq3EX…beL9Ehmainnettestnet
FSVv8A…NK4FB2mainnettestnet
FsYxLQ…CyyhN2mainnettestnet
FSZT2t…XbKrTVmainnettestnet
Ft2Qvg…Dt1Nsbmainnettestnet
FT3DXr…4VS57Nmainnettestnet
Ft7d22…NpU8njmainnettestnet
FTCA6m…SPZ9m5mainnettestnet
FtgiVU…eDKhCcmainnettestnet
FtkR4V…kqUkkrmainnettestnet
FTPcRz…nX59rqmainnettestnet
FtwVYf…3dzg3Hmainnettestnet
FTWxRi…eH9wNHmainnettestnet
Fu2FT1…PzfkMXmainnettestnet
FU2r78…EWfkZamainnettestnet
Fu59T4…F443Gvmainnettestnet
Fu8iS6…1ysjBsmainnettestnet
FUC8SN…1hHt7nmainnettestnet
FueUuy…WsMfAimainnettestnet
FUiUtb…Hzsfb2mainnettestnet
FuLEvB…ZSvbXhmainnettestnet
Fumin2…98nUADmainnettestnet
FuNVVZ…xh8WL8mainnettestnet
FUovPv…HwNbmymainnettestnet
FURJ5U…JGN5p9mainnettestnet
FuSZq1…DhtZQPmainnettestnet
FUURpC…PvmqTZmainnettestnet
FV1JDB…8dueVRmainnettestnet
Fv2rd6…Vf5QiUmainnettestnet
FvEGh2…N13yeBmainnettestnet
FVj9SD…XPaA1dmainnettestnet
FvkAxa…CoSjQ4mainnettestnet
FVM7DQ…ZoBjKVmainnettestnet
FVQCkX…DmnEnFmainnettestnet
FvQgSP…xB3A1smainnettestnet
FVS3Rf…bVqZdcmainnettestnet
FvTw5q…AZXuXMmainnettestnet
FvwnX3…BqN5Vxmainnettestnet
FVZLnR…HrDLfDmainnettestnet
FWb9qE…9uWcUEmainnettestnet
FWCktT…xfNhirmainnettestnet
FwGs5W…KfdARVmainnettestnet
FwV9ta…kZsqGumainnettestnet
Fx67Bg…dT3JKhmainnettestnet
Fx8ATr…craqBzmainnettestnet
FXbp9n…1V683Amainnettestnet
FxBUfJ…vj3yPimainnettestnet
FXCUKB…g2TkHxmainnettestnet
FxeNvT…rzky3Jmainnettestnet
FXGTs4…hi1BRzmainnettestnet
FXsKZZ…GDgcCNmainnettestnet
fXsTXy…hhTrALmainnettestnet
FxTRqM…hB1mq8mainnettestnet
FXucbb…syKDvCmainnettestnet
FXyPdt…JaUwEBmainnettestnet
FxzcwE…AGkghcmainnettestnet
FXZu2L…QBwnKTmainnettestnet
FYFVEb…v6L3BSmainnettestnet
FYkgfS…Az5aH4mainnettestnet
FykmTt…rKYhCkmainnettestnet
FyQYFG…TuNC9Jmainnettestnet
FYsdsB…jsuz5Tmainnettestnet
FYTx4v…Yj7559mainnettestnet
FywKEe…xH61qkmainnettestnet
Fz4Mda…qWvmsKmainnettestnet
FZ4pou…sM2zVrmainnettestnet
FZ4ZCL…28Fdwqmainnettestnet
Fz5Liw…fRr62kmainnettestnet
Fz6BL7…yGvuBTmainnettestnet
FzaAiL…8iRgdPmainnettestnet
FZg9du…8HjPtxmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 2 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.