Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
6,985
of 10,966 on record · 2 departed
Combined
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
88.4%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Departed
2
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 88.3% · T testnet 88.4%

Rejected SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, mean wall-clock duration of a slot, over ten epochs, published by Trillium, and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanTrilliumSlot timeIBRLScore
FfEvhc…VLevB1mainnettestnet
FfF5kG…vvqFfzmainnettestnet
FfvQ1P…5qfCozmainnettestnet
FfWngu…RyaafFmainnettestnet
FfWTp6…DHAPj2mainnettestnet
FfWWgh…2PRCuUmainnettestnet
FFX4Yc…E18Aotmainnettestnet
FFxPTy…xnSGcPmainnettestnet
FFYkrM…kr3Sr5mainnettestnet
FGAwE4…prb3Ximainnettestnet
FGhaNB…ojXvXQmainnettestnet
FgNywu…m6UcTbmainnettestnet
FGT49u…D6vGBnmainnettestnet
Fgt4CH…ZJQiN5mainnettestnet
FguVXZ…qTELV4mainnettestnet
FGvxEe…VCjUkLmainnettestnet
FgXc3D…Xmx7Pvmainnettestnet
FgZ3MD…wtTKvemainnettestnet
FGZYw2…4wzkn3mainnettestnet
Fh5GLU…MQ7Xifmainnettestnet
FH5jr2…RQVoGrmainnettestnet
FHc48S…1AYQ1cmainnettestnet
Fheaef…RcZuM1mainnettestnet
FhemmG…CGgbrnmainnettestnet
FhH5HB…gKcnAJmainnettestnet
FHi211…EpYYkomainnettestnet
FHJVaY…x9CneMmainnettestnet
FHpW19…wyxwytmainnettestnet
FhwmAR…Pv2uAsmainnettestnet
FhYw2A…5BSQj3mainnettestnet
Fi2EHV…mBJKntmainnettestnet
FibLsF…Kv3X8Lmainnettestnet
FidSEG…3wLRJ7mainnettestnet
FihEHg…xSJF92mainnettestnet
FiHj6e…JVF1RCmainnettestnet
FiMP4X…NaBwc8mainnettestnet
FimYWv…jANVevmainnettestnet
FiXXsF…PoYTWymainnettestnet
Fj2Ssc…W568NZmainnettestnet
Fj2xgM…vF7Jscmainnettestnet
FJ9hif…MEUnWpmainnettestnet
FJaGHM…9iGFmzmainnettestnet
FJDigh…XnvZvGmainnettestnet
FJDmjm…ht4E4Mmainnettestnet
FJFqAV…3fGP5zmainnettestnet
FjH3x5…dpvWqSmainnettestnet
FjHUes…G569Scmainnettestnet
FJKQDF…BFHjrymainnettestnet
FJKwE6…E9dezFmainnettestnet
FJp8jZ…ATbZghmainnettestnet
FjX2HW…GzME9hmainnettestnet
FK1k2W…o85SBUmainnettestnet
FK2o5g…QQG4BXmainnettestnet
FK3MgR…S4AiPCmainnettestnet
Fk3wau…Bh7vwcmainnettestnet
Fk4Ujj…qCsxTFmainnettestnet
FKbgi3…7qP4DVmainnettestnet
FkESti…ZYphuUmainnettestnet
FkFQY6…kuJCatmainnettestnet
FKGoTK…4bcCmQmainnettestnet
FkLtiH…QaHbc5mainnettestnet
FkoQCi…4ApXgAmainnettestnet
FKq2qD…B3uiwzmainnettestnet
FKs15V…QzwwqSmainnettestnet
FKxER6…VAhzF4mainnettestnet
FKXM2V…WTdExCmainnettestnet
FkzWiw…MUMattmainnettestnet
FL38WZ…TmeCH5mainnettestnet
FL4Hgc…GJi9F8mainnettestnet
FLc5B7…mtMyP4mainnettestnet
FLkWQ4…8VojkTmainnettestnet
FLmesE…5fp32imainnettestnet
FLWc77…CAg5vemainnettestnet
FLxYk3…rbaVksmainnettestnet
FmaVX7…KiMweTmainnettestnet
Fmc2au…QJ65BBmainnettestnet
FMECRX…kKcJVjmainnettestnet
FMQSzK…7qbUxWmainnettestnet
FMRbjg…KxNpfpmainnettestnet
FmRgFG…mp6DNFmainnettestnet
FmsWf3…NzL45Dmainnettestnet
FMuBqp…GyG95ymainnettestnet
FMuDpa…wJHDecmainnettestnet
FMvVFk…7hX1mumainnettestnet
FmwNCA…EKQNrmmainnettestnet
FMZpRC…Xnq6Jimainnettestnet
Fn8kGb…Fo6EWYmainnettestnet
FnaD1M…VTvws2mainnettestnet
FnDsvX…QtKVQwmainnettestnet
FNJceR…YKXEGtmainnettestnet
FNjtzs…momUt1mainnettestnet
FnmguM…ujAhYWmainnettestnet
FNmTpJ…J9UTYJmainnettestnet
FNrgsf…LHfWr7mainnettestnet
FNUej1…b8AT7Ymainnettestnet
FNxndX…TeW15Bmainnettestnet
FoG4E6…UCUAp1mainnettestnet
Fos7Dt…YVfDqjmainnettestnet
FoywrW…qRDcGPmainnettestnet
FpAXNf…ywhKg7mainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Slot time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerTrillium’s own boundary, not this site’s: 410ms is where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 2 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.