Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
6,985
of 10,966 on record · 2 departed
Combined
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
88.4%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Departed
2
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 88.3% · T testnet 88.4%

Rejected SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, mean wall-clock duration of a slot, over ten epochs, published by Trillium, and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanTrilliumSlot timeIBRLScore
F1USDN…L2qYkLmainnettestnet
F1ZxxR…GhsnLTmainnettestnet
F25rEt…2Bx4Lgmainnettestnet
F26NYj…yg7iKBmainnettestnet
F27wVL…FLVcrDmainnettestnet
F2FjnK…jqrwVkmainnettestnet
F2GTCh…DZJGP2mainnettestnet
F2mcC8…GJ6RmZmainnettestnet
f2PzFV…dZvSnnmainnettestnet
F2U8G5…EGPzLgmainnettestnet
F394ME…oVir8Lmainnettestnet
F3dJbe…Q5srvYmainnettestnet
F3MVCY…uoLdeQmainnettestnet
F3rFgF…BLZbMLmainnettestnet
F3sWEJ…iNyihsmainnettestnet
f3xHmN…FRfG3smainnettestnet
F3YaHn…cLLxsVmainnettestnet
F48wyw…o1Vww4mainnettestnet
F4aeFo…jKxg6Nmainnettestnet
F4dGZ7…B3uTscmainnettestnet
F4fYua…AxEedRmainnettestnet
F4KH3G…hAqSxpmainnettestnet
F4SfJC…Ysb9WLmainnettestnet
F5CRSK…GzaB6nmainnettestnet
F5Me6u…ge9FLMmainnettestnet
F5NihX…PrrXc6mainnettestnet
F5rU9e…czjdyymainnettestnet
F5t3Kj…xR139Cmainnettestnet
F6b9if…BZeSaUmainnettestnet
F6iR1X…PRToXPmainnettestnet
F6mLVT…8Z5byamainnettestnet
F6wzJ2…VndoPsmainnettestnet
F74CCe…17Uvb1mainnettestnet
F7B5SB…WigQGJmainnettestnet
F7HJrp…dU59eumainnettestnet
F7HYuH…zGZ7WKmainnettestnet
F7ma2o…PJDpjFmainnettestnet
F7rsYf…XCJpszmainnettestnet
F7S7Qn…MwxCEsmainnettestnet
F7uGih…HsSnC5mainnettestnet
F85Sjt…BgbAYWmainnettestnet
F89USh…bqNyTgmainnettestnet
f8e1k1…fHxFZNmainnettestnet
F8foJV…MPRfnsmainnettestnet
F8gsAT…fDYRTcmainnettestnet
f8JPS1…K6CPA2mainnettestnet
F8JTwg…PMHYwmmainnettestnet
F8QSHR…ea8uc2mainnettestnet
F8tzeW…EtssfGmainnettestnet
F97xU2…S2i2igmainnettestnet
F9ajsK…csYSCwmainnettestnet
F9g2Ke…JUYxdimainnettestnet
F9LvUQ…LK7usJmainnettestnet
F9nXGv…92UbQZmainnettestnet
F9p4nZ…5pp2tCmainnettestnet
F9WCXn…UK32somainnettestnet
F9ysYJ…GwZtQFmainnettestnet
FA3X9J…4CJ388mainnettestnet
FAfNLT…LDzTAJmainnettestnet
FAgCxk…1LBebRmainnettestnet
Fagg3A…v1XGT2mainnettestnet
FagTwi…wUTpETmainnettestnet
FARmFa…taZY3Xmainnettestnet
FaT9cH…JrXN2Qmainnettestnet
FaWtTV…xeRBzPmainnettestnet
FBifJp…WXxT6Vmainnettestnet
FBJRVm…2ymqeGmainnettestnet
FBRSAy…tYt4gAmainnettestnet
FBs2xJ…hSNin1mainnettestnet
FBScqZ…SBKHL5mainnettestnet
FBwT56…gvbbVGmainnettestnet
FcACeA…mgN7xymainnettestnet
FcBec9…HVhDjFmainnettestnet
Fcdhd9…a7X76Vmainnettestnet
FCknXM…7SRWbamainnettestnet
FCQTtj…q2esufmainnettestnet
FCRYSc…7Rec9zmainnettestnet
FctiGU…WYFw63mainnettestnet
Fd1RAw…Hg6o86mainnettestnet
Fd44mT…JV2qADmainnettestnet
FD72fh…2DrHgvmainnettestnet
FD9RCB…kFXwchmainnettestnet
FDAwN5…3Njj2jmainnettestnet
FDdAeA…sB32Momainnettestnet
FDg16Y…JLGXJDmainnettestnet
FDoyMR…c6GteGmainnettestnet
FDy3qm…bnYF6Wmainnettestnet
Fe15RA…8En3uymainnettestnet
Fe9BFf…XkSPzGmainnettestnet
Feb4e2…DjWjYjmainnettestnet
FeD1Ho…MGeBiimainnettestnet
FEJkXo…tXshsRmainnettestnet
FemXrs…SMYs2amainnettestnet
FEnXuC…UwgAoemainnettestnet
FEPKZH…ZCoHhsmainnettestnet
FeuRpc…SG99owmainnettestnet
Fev7BB…Ymh4WMmainnettestnet
FEvWmM…inGUAWmainnettestnet
Ff5CpT…AbXJGCmainnettestnet
FFCXUp…besVUsmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Slot time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerTrillium’s own boundary, not this site’s: 410ms is where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 2 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.