Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
6,985
of 10,966 on record · 2 departed
Combined
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
88.4%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Departed
2
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 88.3% · T testnet 88.4%

Rejected SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, mean wall-clock duration of a slot, over ten epochs, published by Trillium, and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanTrilliumSlot timeIBRLScore
Eeao59…J4NMJ3mainnettestnet
EEfcHG…AQKZxLmainnettestnet
Eeihqr…ZaoBWCmainnettestnet
EEMRf4…7hjrUJmainnettestnet
EENUSH…Q7oifpmainnettestnet
EeP7Jj…M8fkDamainnettestnet
EEpTzW…Ms1gCxmainnettestnet
EeRPDU…9UfSHQmainnettestnet
EEw7bW…iGp5h6mainnettestnet
EeWuLm…2S4WDgmainnettestnet
EexLNv…BDgSicmainnettestnet
EEzNaX…AsKCATmainnettestnet
EF13gR…nedhuWmainnettestnet
EF2epT…YUD77Pmainnettestnet
EfbcT2…HQFHxNmainnettestnet
EfBLHK…izFwt2mainnettestnet
EFCLYS…x6wuPzmainnettestnet
EFmzi2…LoDTZpmainnettestnet
EFPebh…4dht8gmainnettestnet
EfPhVb…Zf8oSnmainnettestnet
EFQDi4…m87cGUmainnettestnet
EfrSiZ…9BZJ6Cmainnettestnet
EFxqY1…BYCNqVmainnettestnet
Eg24yM…CftjpXmainnettestnet
Eg2tGo…VhUwx5mainnettestnet
EGEWM1…jY8sVCmainnettestnet
EgShkq…wjNXYHmainnettestnet
EgV3Te…uSQE28mainnettestnet
EGzB7K…xuR4BNmainnettestnet
EH5Qus…7RPta4mainnettestnet
Eha8LD…SnBk55mainnettestnet
EhF8sz…aqdxYEmainnettestnet
EhjFut…aqE2Brmainnettestnet
Ehzhgw…EDHWFYmainnettestnet
Eikan3…fjy7iTmainnettestnet
EiTBrX…Xrk9D2mainnettestnet
EivkgM…wkP36Fmainnettestnet
EJ1fHw…TigzXemainnettestnet
eJ6BWq…7ksnUGmainnettestnet
Ej7yQ9…3Z435Ymainnettestnet
Ej9DAM…TPDRFumainnettestnet
EJAMeo…pnr978mainnettestnet
EJBc9G…vSVVGrmainnettestnet
EJG6cj…XzkNexmainnettestnet
Ejor7A…zTXZThmainnettestnet
EJruD1…StRQbCmainnettestnet
Ejs2ux…RPrZ9Kmainnettestnet
EJsmpc…R4741ymainnettestnet
EJt9Ya…QeKt1Emainnettestnet
EJVupF…5MjsKamainnettestnet
Ejyhvr…Hso6wqmainnettestnet
EK26xT…BhbhGbmainnettestnet
EK2A1r…SXKGFtmainnettestnet
EKBc18…TEDaVSmainnettestnet
Ekg6dN…T9sAVcmainnettestnet
EKhnvZ…iCGJo9mainnettestnet
EKHuz3…d5edLhmainnettestnet
Ekpeab…Wrbir8mainnettestnet
ekUdyn…oX5yVNmainnettestnet
EKUHns…WxRLwCmainnettestnet
EkuKBK…R7Tndtmainnettestnet
EKwuTH…GLDFTmmainnettestnet
EKyyFj…D2B78Wmainnettestnet
EKyzkF…qwrqB1mainnettestnet
ELdAUc…mJPbKcmainnettestnet
ELMmeZ…TfaaC2mainnettestnet
EmaGZf…DCAM6Jmainnettestnet
Emeq7m…4rnZE2mainnettestnet
EMgbRY…haet8Zmainnettestnet
EmkDvR…rgt9U8mainnettestnet
EmNJaf…vWE6LJmainnettestnet
EmSybs…NsZHXcmainnettestnet
EMUUPK…VVgVQJmainnettestnet
EmV5bt…oofuigmainnettestnet
EMzN9u…HPXdACmainnettestnet
En26w1…ESDCFZmainnettestnet
EN7jAT…WjxtSNmainnettestnet
ENAdeE…pgwoEwmainnettestnet
ENcaPo…EKAZEemainnettestnet
ENcGgH…p5an7Bmainnettestnet
Enizqk…FWxNQtmainnettestnet
EnKMCR…J5zEzKmainnettestnet
ENpqfc…NSeD1Dmainnettestnet
EnSsPZ…k8GxMCmainnettestnet
ENteEY…QQK97gmainnettestnet
Enw36E…2Fcj7Vmainnettestnet
ENw7Tr…XJWQfjmainnettestnet
ENW7zN…8S4bMSmainnettestnet
ENwBCb…ng9JHKmainnettestnet
EnXLsL…tAuK4Dmainnettestnet
Enzobw…DAvEsvmainnettestnet
Eo3Mj2…m5GxBkmainnettestnet
Eo7Jba…ERp8ZRmainnettestnet
EoqV6T…iFwmAGmainnettestnet
EP3L2a…Ae3Fesmainnettestnet
EP73QK…Ekjab9mainnettestnet
EpdrUt…RPFs2omainnettestnet
EPhkAQ…G2EGoymainnettestnet
EPKboK…i9GyJxmainnettestnet
EpnKvQ…M92wpzmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Slot time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerTrillium’s own boundary, not this site’s: 410ms is where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 2 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.