Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
6,985
of 10,966 on record · 2 departed
Combined
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
88.4%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Departed
2
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 88.3% · T testnet 88.4%

Rejected SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
DoyY6K…7Rfsscmainnettestnet
DP5jHE…Xu8M7fmainnettestnet
DPE8VD…swV1d1mainnettestnet
DpkBdj…6YytMxmainnettestnet
DpkoHf…8ePy6umainnettestnet
DpvL5E…5jc7nCmainnettestnet
DpWmTA…gk8C8Xmainnettestnet
Dq4QXa…LFaQtJmainnettestnet
DQ8D6Y…JtdQXnmainnettestnet
DQB2W5…RE9LpEmainnettestnet
DqbdaG…2vpWyymainnettestnet
DqBvkY…6STctzmainnettestnet
DqCG9g…oLRsUsmainnettestnet
DQCriU…smK7Ydmainnettestnet
DqD2jn…qDdwetmainnettestnet
DqF2HY…aD3aGhmainnettestnet
DQg27w…BuVKJxmainnettestnet
DqGiq3…Pfp23Emainnettestnet
DQiEAE…ox4g6omainnettestnet
Dqm9Sr…hRmU9Smainnettestnet
DqMUvb…inKqcjmainnettestnet
Dqneqc…NX8QPhmainnettestnet
DQQFNr…zs7miamainnettestnet
DqrNju…AeMB5Amainnettestnet
DqRT48…Wv2gyxmainnettestnet
dQSPqa…gTwJmzmainnettestnet
DqsZQn…tZsk6hmainnettestnet
DQVq5Z…6X7ozvmainnettestnet
DR3kJw…Epqgwcmainnettestnet
DR5s55…2gS14kmainnettestnet
Dr9RHJ…zYyfXpmainnettestnet
DRdj4C…pbmXqnmainnettestnet
DrjxRF…SVXuZ7mainnettestnet
DRNKCm…RoixyBmainnettestnet
DruKnE…59UEykmainnettestnet
DRxNxR…UF9D5Hmainnettestnet
DryuVS…MiLV6bmainnettestnet
DryUxo…eiEsdgmainnettestnet
DS7Dxc…iugDjbmainnettestnet
DsaPWC…5F2fzWmainnettestnet
DSBFx8…P6RACxmainnettestnet
DsCPB4…C9qNppmainnettestnet
DsFgZp…gPai7Amainnettestnet
DsfrDe…Z2Wzddmainnettestnet
DSgPT3…FXgPYgmainnettestnet
DSHRYe…bv5Wc5mainnettestnet
DSiKSe…JGKYUimainnettestnet
DsPbAF…bWDjD8mainnettestnet
Dsq1jD…puoCUfmainnettestnet
Dss1SY…2c5HJEmainnettestnet
DsvWRt…GyR2g4mainnettestnet
DSzRrU…WcfPd2mainnettestnet
Dt6UYK…JCFTnhmainnettestnet
dt9DTW…7d6D3Xmainnettestnet
DtHW1S…pca3zamainnettestnet
DTJcjB…GcbY4Dmainnettestnet
DtjodB…RiX89Lmainnettestnet
DtjZLq…TmfVEDmainnettestnet
DTsxED…ZCa1Sjmainnettestnet
DTt3Ko…Go3kHSmainnettestnet
DTtm3c…Z3ViJFmainnettestnet
DTvHtb…LpgqT6mainnettestnet
DtVNCy…Jcc1LJmainnettestnet
Du4uCR…bNJmgjmainnettestnet
Duende…qQAnzvmainnettestnet
DufghB…uPuH1gmainnettestnet
duup1c…RFzDmkmainnettestnet
DuxAio…XWgx9Vmainnettestnet
DVerNP…sDXmrzmainnettestnet
DVG7M3…s1ogJymainnettestnet
DvrgYd…6BswTtmainnettestnet
DVuixx…kJkB1Emainnettestnet
DVwPEU…iGwC2Rmainnettestnet
DVwsbk…x6sfGxmainnettestnet
DvXUCE…3vdNDQmainnettestnet
Dw3mZk…cBn3vamainnettestnet
DWEuYX…zNpf6Zmainnettestnet
DwGEK1…ifaXZimainnettestnet
DWGupv…7RGWsLmainnettestnet
DwHxBy…rcmvL9mainnettestnet
DWknNs…PM73Qkmainnettestnet
DWNCAe…YWHUAsmainnettestnet
DWNK2x…3YsMktmainnettestnet
DwuGHF…mLeWLMmainnettestnet
DWuoSq…HwUESmmainnettestnet
DwVrdr…SRQBCimainnettestnet
DWWT1K…EJqTRYmainnettestnet
DwZsr2…g1ESscmainnettestnet
Dx71Ev…pFWpE5mainnettestnet
DxbBH8…joEam9mainnettestnet
DXciFT…VWPESzmainnettestnet
Dxr9zH…McMm4Hmainnettestnet
DXrot7…Nayc5wmainnettestnet
DXumaY…kGHZ9xmainnettestnet
DXYfpN…sRb1hQmainnettestnet
DXZ9hp…jfv9AZmainnettestnet
DXzQs1…H8ZN9vmainnettestnet
DyB57f…zSez7zmainnettestnet
DYF9xn…WPms7Lmainnettestnet
DYH91H…QCCb8dmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 2 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.