Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, mean wall-clock duration of a slot, over ten epochs, published by Trillium, and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanTrilliumSlot timeIBRLScore
2bXqc2…FDmRFPmainnettestnet
2bZJSv…tpqJWamainnettestnet
2C27v3…tw2cVdmainnettestnet
2c99PB…jnGhgSmainnettestnet
2CnhD4…2o4PeDmainnettestnet
2croNb…YWHRU1mainnettestnet
2CToog…AJ6ei5mainnettestnet
2cvDrj…2f1Huemainnettestnet
2cWmaE…3Efopumainnettestnet
2D2gk6…PxxjQ6mainnettestnet
2Da7eJ…UdF6sNmainnettestnet
2dCPDD…ixymhTmainnettestnet
2DdZTx…8nBC5xmainnettestnet
2DJY9k…bgzwCTmainnettestnet
2DLsGA…mGZvBDmainnettestnet
2dm6hn…9yRRWwmainnettestnet
2dMjjU…aDeBacmainnettestnet
2dpWgV…2jfq6Emainnettestnet
2DrSU5…Tob4GGmainnettestnet
2Dwz5Q…Loeez4mainnettestnet
2dxq2e…BVp4hpmainnettestnet
2E2JPu…jg1bzwmainnettestnet
2EBHU3…Z63nSFmainnettestnet
2edPzi…Vyoefrmainnettestnet
2EHMuM…V1L2Zgmainnettestnet
2EpJeg…ngec1qmainnettestnet
2eRawq…2pEtV8mainnettestnet
2F5UbD…z3kWJDmainnettestnet
2FFNDC…FQVqvWmainnettestnet
2FJ1GF…vHs5h3mainnettestnet
2foV4o…urf5sbmainnettestnet
2fphqq…B2wMHPmainnettestnet
2FYm6T…juRnE8mainnettestnet
2g76YA…eU7e6jmainnettestnet
2g8u3f…TbYTLxmainnettestnet
2gCj75…WBgZr5mainnettestnet
2GFou8…y7KJZ8mainnettestnet
2Gg4oW…RRm5H9mainnettestnet
2gheQb…h6REGimainnettestnet
2GQB3U…Pbzr5Pmainnettestnet
2GRgxw…DMmFH6mainnettestnet
2GXG6P…2J1vyYmainnettestnet
2H2tdh…RWwMZsmainnettestnet
2H4nZf…ySLCsumainnettestnet
2h5CPV…ZBHfckmainnettestnet
2hGgVo…HdZMqcmainnettestnet
2HHPch…sn7BPEmainnettestnet
2hkiuu…1EkQYPmainnettestnet
2hrA9Y…Frh7Wcmainnettestnet
2HXpGB…Zcs8kbmainnettestnet
2HySxT…xwy6uymainnettestnet
2i5zVs…1oQW5qmainnettestnet
2ie38Z…qLqesxmainnettestnet
2iMLxi…eQXraKmainnettestnet
2isfcT…bfkFsgmainnettestnet
2J8bud…nWKjzUmainnettestnet
2jAgjC…Ur7Mh9mainnettestnet
2JdMkE…EBRUsumainnettestnet
2JDo5S…H2PfC9mainnettestnet
2JRACn…hmdXE1mainnettestnet
2jSnRm…HH34Aomainnettestnet
2JuS3q…7uZMwemainnettestnet
2kA9Pk…ywGKxRmainnettestnet
2kcWUH…cLT2xUmainnettestnet
2kDgfY…9rV5jYmainnettestnet
2KL5Xj…qzGsSkmainnettestnet
2kVZVT…m5WLvRmainnettestnet
2LfwqA…eJDBLUmainnettestnet
2LqCid…8bwrqZmainnettestnet
2m3dAa…BSaKPUmainnettestnet
2MA6oJ…nfK3HMmainnettestnet
2MeC52…UNwgX4mainnettestnet
2MecuF…78AAp4mainnettestnet
2mgL1a…SDLznxmainnettestnet
2MgZQz…zykaR4mainnettestnet
2mhHSR…LrhaA2mainnettestnet
2mimK1…f4tq8emainnettestnet
2mkUTX…xCvHVwmainnettestnet
2mX1wT…wtt9W6mainnettestnet
2mZRGw…HNEgvJmainnettestnet
2N3WG2…3WhDp4mainnettestnet
2ngwpP…eVqbPWmainnettestnet
2NHmri…TdtoY3mainnettestnet
2NiRPK…CAXhcbmainnettestnet
2noQXA…gzQ7dsmainnettestnet
2nUaPG…EzNLiSmainnettestnet
2oGN2e…AGnYubmainnettestnet
2oJgZQ…X9YfWBmainnettestnet
2ojYBu…EVv8Bvmainnettestnet
2P14yS…jFZnZgmainnettestnet
2PhVkD…HRUXCLmainnettestnet
2phyun…CN9qJumainnettestnet
2PQPvq…VhB3femainnettestnet
2pXF6y…CtE9mhmainnettestnet
2PZ4Av…XyXJSxmainnettestnet
2qeaCe…f1shsFmainnettestnet
2qhr4P…B51HL2mainnettestnet
2Qn6ML…6jjV3pmainnettestnet
2QqsW3…UiRNYxmainnettestnet
2QrFxc…79sXmJmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Slot time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerTrillium’s own boundary, not this site’s: 410ms is where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.