Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
Spread Networks, Retired3C2c…18fimainnettestnet
StakeChain, Retired49j9…jBrbmainnettestnet403ms93.0
StakeHero, Retired8MZF…DP7Xmainnettestnet
StakeRoot 🌱, Retired9hNj…4QZsmainnettestnet
StakingTo.Me, RetiredFXrz…mUXdmainnettestnet
StarPaw.wtf, RetiredFaHh…UUFdmainnettestnet
StrangeLove, RetiredSTLV…xryzmainnettestnet
SUN, RetiredBGTC…Mobwmainnettestnet
sunrisestake, RetiredX2Pu…m681mainnettestnet
Svechnikova, Retired3UaA…7HBjmainnettestnet
svens-validator, RetiredJBiW…f4C2mainnettestnet
Sveta-solana_MB, RetiredEXCM…JJ6amainnettestnet
Svetlana Habibulovna, Retired7RdX…2yDCmainnettestnet
Swiss Technologies, Retired4cuZ…HGM1mainnettestnet
Tanny25, RetiredBesD…utj1mainnettestnet
TestNet Validator, RetiredC8GF…yYDRmainnettestnet
TestVlad, RetiredEewy…oMSSmainnettestnet
Thalos, Retired2VGJ…fgtnmainnettestnet
thefirstone15, RetiredGgyn…vYecmainnettestnet
TokenVentures, RetiredDzLj…n19Hmainnettestnet
Tokyo Solana Validator, RetiredEjUA…U6wTmainnettestnet
TopReward - 0% fee and mev, top APY!, RetiredTopj…KhDGmainnettestnet406ms95.6
Toshi CSS, Retiredtosh…exn2mainnettestnet
trinity28v2, RetiredGAeL…7YVSmainnettestnet
ttbtc, Retired7zrq…S7kmmainnettestnet
unrealisher-testnet, Retired8cAd…RfF5mainnettestnet
Uphold, Retired74Mz…37nEmainnettestnet405ms96.3
Urb4n_Thr34t, RetiredBT9Z…bRubmainnettestnet
v1-alexandra, RetireddHwh…7QFKmainnettestnet
v1-galina, Retired37zA…QKzumainnettestnet
v1-konstantin, Retired7WgB…4LQfmainnettestnet
v1-marsel, Retired6MsQ…LtJymainnettestnet
v1-max, RetiredCB7X…CWfzmainnettestnet
Valhall Validator, Retired9XBZ…fTf3mainnettestnet
Vera Poltoradina, RetiredDiVK…QjVbmainnettestnet
Vietcong, RetiredCa5e…JPyPmainnettestnet
viki_miki, Retired8TmL…R29Dmainnettestnet
Viktor Koval, Retired7njd…sv7Gmainnettestnet
Vivi Validator, RetiredVALP…5DuHmainnettestnet
VN Capital, RetiredFk1g…UKitmainnettestnet
Vnuk.Nataly, RetiredHxnj…1yLmmainnettestnet
WayneWayner, Retired4LV3…1KpXmainnettestnet
Webfeld, Retired5ugo…McV6mainnettestnet
WinStake Labs, Retired2nhG…dQotmainnettestnet410ms91.8
witnsHQ, RetiredFxC3…Lw5Hmainnettestnet
XOLANA, RetiredE1WE…2WSVmainnettestnet
yelllowsin | Stakehere, RetiredHwdf…PNHUmainnettestnet
Yoda, RetiredDtKM…bBzbmainnettestnet
Yulana Validator, RetiredAsju…tThamainnettestnet
YVa, Retired3yVY…bDC9mainnettestnet
Zhanel, Retired65ky…DHCemainnettestnet
122S7L…1wgp7omainnettestnet
12MsyS…DoxeKomainnettestnet
138KHw…1CDEjTmainnettestnet
13beVc…otFfB1mainnettestnet
13cm6z…ps9P1nmainnettestnet
13hfvy…GXotJjmainnettestnet
14fiAP…UL7dGCmainnettestnet
14LC2N…M1PzJXmainnettestnet
14tXUF…smt682mainnettestnet
1avam7…Casa2hmainnettestnet
1eL4xJ…46GX7Hmainnettestnet
1EWZm7…swX2Tpmainnettestnet
1LAVmr…YkWJyqmainnettestnet
1LSdaH…xe8p5Rmainnettestnet
1NyoJi…jkRg4aDepartedmainnet86.4%testnet
1so1ct…HbpdXgmainnettestnet
21N9sd…wyh9R9mainnettestnet
21TGKE…tyChzJmainnettestnet
21yrfT…JSrMZpmainnettestnet
22EzeM…M5cfDJmainnettestnet
22KU3X…LJ2aNYmainnettestnet
22LArm…X1bfKymainnettestnet
22SgHL…fJPAcumainnettestnet
22vXav…GRQKDymainnettestnet
2374M8…JmbTUhmainnettestnet
23jqYa…ydGuhimainnettestnet
23WhWP…twr5qFmainnettestnet
245B9W…7vAHDUmainnettestnet
24KPha…L6SfJzmainnettestnet
24xpPU…EYr3y4mainnettestnet
25m5Mq…nHgQAEmainnettestnet
26dFca…2Kvbj7mainnettestnet
26GjBM…aVEFrLmainnettestnet
26Mvuf…AE8qhvmainnettestnet
272TUf…nJVLQWmainnettestnet
27g4u2…S14TBVmainnettestnet
283gFg…uBXBNBmainnettestnet
28Dgcw…9FjkNVmainnettestnet
28khvE…LEYLk6mainnettestnet
28PpKt…N1aPSumainnettestnet
292UCG…KJe4fhmainnettestnet
29aSXK…Rp2sKGmainnettestnet
29bpU3…11HyH3mainnettestnet
29by7u…DNQixumainnettestnet
29Cts6…J8pgvcmainnettestnet
2ADXik…k6HqKbmainnettestnet
2Anbzu…1mgzLEmainnettestnet
2axX5a…QVAcXnmainnettestnet
2B2PxU…9byJfpmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.