Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, mean wall-clock duration of a slot, over ten epochs, published by Trillium, and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanTrilliumSlot timeIBRLScore
JaPaqm…UPueBxmainnettestnet
JAWQcS…d6zRgPmainnettestnet
JAZN7c…C88PM3mainnettestnet
JB1RS5…2TXhoKmainnettestnet
JB1ti4…GZ5a8Pmainnettestnet
JBqtjZ…Gkz9Hbmainnettestnet
JC9HLe…SbxN7Qmainnettestnet
JCNXAd…UJYJymmainnettestnet
JCW75L…G7667kmainnettestnet
JCXZCN…Yfnmhxmainnettestnet
JDNbyx…LWzUCRmainnettestnet
JDYAat…nV6X5Amainnettestnet
JE7iHG…Jypx9Umainnettestnet
JEGL1F…Hvv9MGmainnettestnet
JEz865…siF64fmainnettestnet
JF2hwG…cpLYqEmainnettestnet
jpPmvm…yhoMJDmainnettestnet
JsqSym…3emVremainnettestnet
jYKtWJ…Yde6HFmainnettestnet
k5xt9c…mTydCVmainnettestnet
kapMmi…VHcKfBmainnettestnet
KBvbhD…ySjqLJmainnettestnet
KEYc8G…EgC2x7mainnettestnet
KiNGTL…V9cyKQmainnettestnet
kMiZk4…uBmb5Fmainnettestnet
kormos…Sj9xXymainnettestnet
KWfX64…zWq3SLmainnettestnet
kYR6w1…SFxxgEmainnettestnet
KZPc3Q…uWLaUbmainnettestnet
KzvPYY…7aWMGMmainnettestnet
LEEJAG…Luk9NHmainnettestnet
LHN3sa…trbwnEmainnettestnet
LiFiDM…UANVvqmainnettestnet
LooTTR…Dw6om4mainnettestnet
Love31…STCa6smainnettestnet
LowiqK…JdzuQ3mainnettestnet
LzNnVA…bXba8Nmainnettestnet
M4n1et…EkDZz2mainnettestnet
MAiNWJ…RyaCiXmainnettestnet
makot6…iiGSt4mainnettestnet
marMwT…xQ7GtTmainnettestnet
MARSpw…161YSvmainnettestnet
MBRyRx…EpWihmmainnettestnet
metaLo…phRwwRmainnettestnet
mGBLBV…sC3dpEmainnettestnet
miLaM2…ExFQgCmainnettestnet
MjJPoQ…JzJk5Mmainnettestnet
mLyfgv…8y8hmYmainnettestnet
MNDEE2…cBkSj6mainnettestnet
MT6hqF…tRYYGWmainnettestnet
mUABYC…1mhLwbmainnettestnet
mUbBKn…DakJcNmainnettestnet
mwn2bF…uitwgbmainnettestnet
MxnmKB…Bg1rpWmainnettestnet
MyAiad…Hoa6rqmainnettestnet
N27Z7P…LEm2c4mainnettestnet
n67CVh…CdHz6xmainnettestnet
n9XVBa…FdWRUrmainnettestnet
NafaCJ…tcL2s9mainnettestnet
narPxm…m8kcrhmainnettestnet
nazMvH…dPC6XSmainnettestnet
NGSrNa…UmMmYWmainnettestnet
NN75Bp…X4WmJkmainnettestnet
NorthE…A1jFzbmainnettestnet
nxts9S…6xX5oemainnettestnet
oMiZy2…1jDMT5mainnettestnet
oWLiVn…Mju2wjmainnettestnet
oXis58…aySAJFmainnettestnet
p1ayS5…m6ApACmainnettestnet
P3hVZP…qJnAUumainnettestnet
p6ejcw…Snfx1Jmainnettestnet
parayL…RWMeRzmainnettestnet
Pgz9nZ…iNGGaGmainnettestnet
ph5BpK…wzVeCgmainnettestnet
phaeBU…KMm1PXmainnettestnet
pitMDE…QnL5RGmainnettestnet
pmjKhv…YLFA7vmainnettestnet
PoN1E3…DwbgTUmainnettestnet
Power7…54MmePmainnettestnet
Q3i9CQ…QDQJMMmainnettestnet
q4mtPA…nHxmH4mainnettestnet
qgZfSt…iT7Gjjmainnettestnet
qKEaT4…p5zv7Gmainnettestnet
qkht2z…ehfSjwmainnettestnet
QmiutN…AqemCQmainnettestnet
QQnX7i…4vnNTwmainnettestnet
qRoC8X…hk7kUtmainnettestnet
qvtXhR…AnMtd6mainnettestnet
QxUabP…HQAda7mainnettestnet
qXxnH2…1GTk4Amainnettestnet
R1parD…qvAJR3mainnettestnet
R3LW4t…Xf7qr5mainnettestnet
RAM21a…1LVKCSmainnettestnet
RAWm37…hn9Yymmainnettestnet
RDZMGL…bFy4nqmainnettestnet
RFLCTD…nPfQmHmainnettestnet
RhoAkv…G6HraTmainnettestnet
RockDZ…tZoar7mainnettestnet
RR4ptw…V6vRnAmainnettestnet
RT2Jvo…d5dQVbmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Slot time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerTrillium’s own boundary, not this site’s: 410ms is where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.