Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
HNfuaE…LyUneDmainnettestnet
HNgKsX…tx4TEPmainnettestnet
HNkhzP…AaFVoWmainnettestnet
HNLHjX…5qbeVHmainnettestnet
HNpAVo…ySVRW8mainnettestnet
HNWHYC…4mbBZZmainnettestnet
HnXtDk…HaQstMmainnettestnet
HoK9nD…N14Yu3mainnettestnet
Hom38o…sagupXmainnettestnet
HoXskz…BmXcJ2mainnettestnet
HpMDTt…EyQe9rmainnettestnet
HPPvLW…Qn5qdJmainnettestnet
HpSAyQ…nBMKKFmainnettestnet
HPUfen…pQ2oAYmainnettestnet
HpUMNm…Z5HjCMmainnettestnet
HPW4FG…anMBq1mainnettestnet
HpX7r9…qzKwi4mainnettestnet
HqdPf9…XuzQ1tmainnettestnet
HqEaoD…cp7CH1mainnettestnet
HqiVmw…J4pMNWmainnettestnet
HQPDKt…GjHDE2mainnettestnet
HqYBkF…u41jL3mainnettestnet
HRULWx…mrmHzsmainnettestnet
HRvBZR…5r9TQGmainnettestnet
HrW2Az…fxuxjymainnettestnet
HRx6Jv…j524bxmainnettestnet
Hsd5Uo…bEZsiFmainnettestnet
Hsnpqs…uddwYWmainnettestnet
HSPaZz…de7GsHmainnettestnet
HSsKp9…m1BHLkmainnettestnet
HSTqGR…QHfokJmainnettestnet
HSwgHw…yKWB1tmainnettestnet
HSX42d…nPXpgPmainnettestnet
HSZfYv…nbhPgYmainnettestnet
HSzGnH…iyAFd3mainnettestnet
HthGcD…ywtjGymainnettestnet
HtQBbz…G7gUXxmainnettestnet
HTTPKy…gU6heMmainnettestnet
Hu61jb…HTuwSkmainnettestnet
HU6B6c…SgKvcHmainnettestnet
HuBHxm…q5t4j9mainnettestnet
HUN9L8…PM7AQ9mainnettestnet
Hupfsb…YQ4JRsmainnettestnet
HUTw4e…Smz6hdDepartedmainnet88.7%testnet
HUvqQe…hwSJcrmainnettestnet
Hv6K6Q…L8Yopnmainnettestnet
HVAYog…aWzWbSmainnettestnet
HVDZ6W…VsG9oNmainnettestnet
HVfipo…MnWYx7Departedmainnet76.6%testnet
HvhUSt…mSDoTwmainnettestnet
HvUiMi…qWKSawmainnettestnet
HW7ntf…2gksKQmainnettestnet
HwC1Cf…RZdm12mainnettestnet
HWdEMi…h8VUMkmainnettestnet
HwhwtL…VCw3rtmainnettestnet
Hx1QX1…U9r4f1mainnettestnet
HXiEsi…6qeGVmmainnettestnet
HXKRTL…QuzrAHmainnettestnet
HXwNj3…w7jf8Zmainnettestnet
HY3N1V…JsENgTmainnettestnet
Hy7og2…2upThrmainnettestnet
HYcdDd…hJPDvAmainnettestnet
HYeV9o…FkmL6qmainnettestnet
HYpXmo…W8Haeqmainnettestnet
HyqK2A…UVx57mmainnettestnet
HywfbC…TnAmFxmainnettestnet
HYZ4Nc…g1UcYFmainnettestnet
HYzrS4…dyCW9wmainnettestnet
Hz7fxK…gcRpxumainnettestnet
Hzn6Yh…TL1FgGmainnettestnet
i4cFPx…he958emainnettestnet
i5Puhk…Cdz9Ztmainnettestnet
ivanB3…cRNg5kmainnettestnet
J1iu5U…zadEsfmainnettestnet
J1vd4X…mbT8Nzmainnettestnet
J2K2Ru…seLvUcmainnettestnet
J2PCgR…ar3zGJmainnettestnet
J2WVQZ…9cUYv4mainnettestnet
J3dfNC…pnAoKkmainnettestnet
J3sFui…u6Dfmhmainnettestnet
J4nEpu…XwFbtVmainnettestnet
J4TuEZ…uRT87jmainnettestnet
J4Um4H…rzawK2mainnettestnet
J4XFZz…vTpLVDmainnettestnet
J5n83R…rhJvQWmainnettestnet
J5qHVF…QQfH1Jmainnettestnet
J5VpSE…815T1Amainnettestnet
J5YnpC…7hgDRumainnettestnet
J6GAp5…Bfh3pjmainnettestnet
J6LcBa…jPaoGxmainnettestnet
J6mgW5…WoAEi4mainnettestnet
J6MrsE…eCvBNYmainnettestnet
J6RZLK…yJjUpkmainnettestnet
J75rPT…tLLrBimainnettestnet
J8FMbS…2Q3cuPmainnettestnet
J8ZZbS…gp515Cmainnettestnet
J9a544…PMDxDvmainnettestnet
J9Byso…5H68oymainnettestnet
J9zNpQ…xVgkqXmainnettestnet
JAkMuy…ndbQLgmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.