Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
FZPzfj…TxePRgmainnettestnet
FzRJsC…p1zKsAmainnettestnet
FZrKHD…nePjtNmainnettestnet
FZrnLd…sSbUaomainnettestnet
g11uKd…SHhQQLmainnettestnet
G1Fwen…zcAehYmainnettestnet
G1JBgr…JkgQZymainnettestnet
G1P3Uh…rbq4qEmainnettestnet
G1VEi9…H1rov4mainnettestnet
G2oKXq…jyRyrCmainnettestnet
G3HnLq…sANDxTmainnettestnet
G3k6b7…S1YCFxmainnettestnet
G3kxBq…b4ZfcVmainnettestnet
G3QABU…YcR4Zkmainnettestnet
G4cTnR…QeapKHmainnettestnet
G4g2pV…NjuXb3mainnettestnet
G4n3Bn…Lihtdomainnettestnet
G4wNc2…kxMp3amainnettestnet
G59gSE…vMuWL1mainnettestnet
G5BRjD…TkxroHmainnettestnet
G5niz4…Zwq5hVmainnettestnet
g5qR77…8kHjznmainnettestnet
G5x2yA…yNnWDsmainnettestnet
G62AUt…zdF3nBmainnettestnet
G69DGP…rpGLPcmainnettestnet
G6GtgG…6W3DWymainnettestnet
G6Lgek…e6dnEzmainnettestnet
G6S9va…xganaEmainnettestnet
G78Fuf…kKjKtBmainnettestnet
G7DMC7…TmpQ4Xmainnettestnet
G7HRR8…CbqtXRmainnettestnet
G847em…mdK1qVmainnettestnet
G88B6R…CNmmvPmainnettestnet
G8AFgL…gdhMa1mainnettestnet
G8G777…kBWdqemainnettestnet
G91ZQg…hzxmYumainnettestnet
G957QZ…mRVawcmainnettestnet
G95gsg…vYUFvNmainnettestnet
G96sDA…4n4xrvmainnettestnet
G9Cn68…1tyxrZmainnettestnet
G9he1z…uoWuGNmainnettestnet
G9mJPs…RWUKsQmainnettestnet
G9nc5q…T3yn1vmainnettestnet
G9oPGS…6k9iUVmainnettestnet
GA197F…fqauwQmainnettestnet
GANifb…cNRYTpmainnettestnet
GAxnoP…xuFeTtmainnettestnet
GAz9j3…vE7BTGmainnettestnet
GBdZX9…Y3qsggmainnettestnet
GBnSAv…LaNhokmainnettestnet
GC88NL…KhBMsJmainnettestnet
GCGPgU…1zLM5Wmainnettestnet
GCtUtU…fraF5ymainnettestnet
Gcxq79…rTBVcvmainnettestnet
GczNJN…1xGjP8mainnettestnet
GdMGei…2Brehxmainnettestnet
GdQsAF…XBMiLxmainnettestnet
GDXVyr…4hwNXnmainnettestnet
GEFUPC…YFmcULmainnettestnet
GEopYZ…BumQvCmainnettestnet
GETi2k…PDXWgtmainnettestnet
GfdTZu…KfX8qqmainnettestnet
GfGisz…ALLYbcmainnettestnet
Gfi7oh…TG5hVqmainnettestnet
GfkM6m…FMT1jSmainnettestnet
GFN58G…FBTfwhmainnettestnet
GFuhha…ucPrkpmainnettestnet
GGDB6k…67StLYmainnettestnet
Ggiddi…jyRnPRmainnettestnet
GGipPJ…kbLrf6mainnettestnet
GGNszs…eVTo1Kmainnettestnet
GGQrCH…qByUJ5mainnettestnet
GGujcE…NZxPSumainnettestnet
GgVUSr…hnp5N6mainnettestnet
GgWKW5…iEjhTkmainnettestnet
GH5mzv…KRAsSbmainnettestnet
Gh9pPk…Yb7rpimainnettestnet
GheM6d…s51SpDmainnettestnet
GHoXsR…fFPBGomainnettestnet
GHwcYP…x4achGmainnettestnet
GhYq33…RP7i36mainnettestnet
GiWxkc…6Dq2vqmainnettestnet
GJJBhu…rbgccGmainnettestnet
GjLM4K…pkUtckmainnettestnet
GjqRmr…VRcnwhmainnettestnet
GJzD7T…DQTEkrmainnettestnet
GKckqw…rU5Vwmmainnettestnet
GKipcC…ySuuvvmainnettestnet
Gkw5aN…QTAYsrmainnettestnet
GKwvhQ…hsf7tkmainnettestnet
GkZhsd…WTd8Qfmainnettestnet
GL3wFb…KYuQZWmainnettestnet
GLAMiB…PGBFACmainnettestnet
GLEvoq…anSFppmainnettestnet
GLkuMA…B6eCaDmainnettestnet
Gm2X4B…v5i7uXmainnettestnet
GmEq1U…w5Q6BJmainnettestnet
gmnRvo…gD3uppmainnettestnet
gMxv82…ZSv8GLmainnettestnet
GN2k9K…phELN5mainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.