Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
Eg6FWQ…ygKJ9Emainnettestnet
EG6HKA…vNM4hWmainnettestnet
EgAV17…eN19ELmainnettestnet
EgkoNh…X4ZhTWmainnettestnet
EguM3i…EwM4h6mainnettestnet
Eh3EyG…9Jo9nxmainnettestnet
EH3sXr…cjvHKkmainnettestnet
EhBCbu…MDe8Famainnettestnet
EhBhC8…6H7hXymainnettestnet
EHBJhb…gVtmtgmainnettestnet
EhDfF8…JsPUyJmainnettestnet
EhdN2U…q69ySVmainnettestnet
EhQrKB…qm5354mainnettestnet
EHsabd…VmVSgrmainnettestnet
ehsrLN…EJqPrYmainnettestnet
EhUySy…NbfvGHmainnettestnet
Ei29qt…6auKSVmainnettestnet
Ei6p2u…TzWzoAmainnettestnet
Ei8Laj…B4HT2umainnettestnet
EiiX4T…sYQxZbmainnettestnet
EiXkvr…k4D1eRmainnettestnet
EJdEgg…CrrzGQmainnettestnet
EJG3C9…CwFoH6mainnettestnet
EjLHRG…DBMe5Nmainnettestnet
EjLzhr…a915w4mainnettestnet
Ejwmjf…FMgJhgmainnettestnet
EJy8s1…4Rij7amainnettestnet
EK3w6o…8cyWnBmainnettestnet
EKgfaY…5dH91Xmainnettestnet
EKHm6q…2RcVGumainnettestnet
EkJPRm…vwsJX4mainnettestnet
EKmsyJ…qPRFEgmainnettestnet
EksG3p…8syvMrmainnettestnet
EKuM2J…xUQQEPmainnettestnet
eKV6p4…cxshrkmainnettestnet
EKZkne…ondmSVmainnettestnet
ELAB5i…3qpnohmainnettestnet
ELm6yo…qgcFw5mainnettestnet
EM1j5a…Ao4WjEmainnettestnet
Em6tvk…JALQkTmainnettestnet
EmftnP…qskGCTmainnettestnet
EMj2nr…ow7jnHmainnettestnet
EmKkip…BoBsazmainnettestnet
ENBsT8…nrqCgCmainnettestnet
ENDmTy…X1wiNDmainnettestnet
ENepDK…XJ35SVmainnettestnet
ENNWck…avemZfmainnettestnet
ENsEa6…sB2CGomainnettestnet
EnukWy…yrxb5Vmainnettestnet
ENuxdv…htsHfwmainnettestnet
EoBYaq…mQtCihmainnettestnet
EoG4AS…nQZL7kmainnettestnet
EP16Ds…yQADgNmainnettestnet
EpjPvY…WxYvHWmainnettestnet
EPnfbY…1n9VSVmainnettestnet
EPpjmJ…FhkEKvmainnettestnet
EPRdfe…oQ9DWPmainnettestnet
EPSBQo…NxEKKVmainnettestnet
EQ3shu…xcT7BPmainnettestnet
EQ6Sb8…Hbsp4Vmainnettestnet
EqbAy2…1Rigkpmainnettestnet
EqgCWd…xU5rSVmainnettestnet
EQKK6z…Thh7nWmainnettestnet
Er71oq…S9t3Qhmainnettestnet
ErcvbX…ZhWCnqmainnettestnet
ERjpM4…QSHXeRmainnettestnet
ERNsDV…a4h6Bfmainnettestnet
ERo4KW…tnBYtbmainnettestnet
ERV7vN…UkH5jmmainnettestnet
ERW9Lu…ZyABcxmainnettestnet
ES1M3t…Wkd38Rmainnettestnet
ES2UkF…6uMfxXmainnettestnet
ES4vUN…d7Mp44mainnettestnet
EscJv4…ZyduPxmainnettestnet
ESEPWs…Xzs648mainnettestnet
EsgYHE…NcK5SVmainnettestnet
EShk8k…94546fmainnettestnet
ESJ9CH…KzhV3Emainnettestnet
EsrYhn…RjGTMhmainnettestnet
Et4JQA…o9KkRvmainnettestnet
ET8SXu…7Y2DgVmainnettestnet
EtbN12…Sr824Kmainnettestnet
etherU…cN6nbcmainnettestnet
EtoMAp…9fZRnpmainnettestnet
Ettghf…TAbZuwmainnettestnet
ETtmAt…brbqmamainnettestnet
ETvFQU…VNtRpPmainnettestnet
Eu6z4z…5WYsozmainnettestnet
EuA9VA…WoDJXLmainnettestnet
EuD4Cu…xaD1cTmainnettestnet
EuFGYR…XvLpfXmainnettestnet
EUVebt…L1Q7YSmainnettestnet
Ev3A9X…2YQmCMmainnettestnet
EvCZwj…mYwp3qmainnettestnet
EvFXJe…pe4Ja1mainnettestnet
EVgBf4…1yeTZnmainnettestnet
EVGzWK…8hSuk7mainnettestnet
EvH3Fv…yT4HH4mainnettestnet
EVHef6…yn4Kbcmainnettestnet
EVoYb2…LTsAtWmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.