Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,494
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 36 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, mean wall-clock duration of a slot, over ten epochs, published by Trillium, and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanTrilliumSlot timeIBRLScore
Brzqwi…15qBtFmainnettestnet
BsFZcZ…RqQjVBmainnettestnet
BSMbWy…2N3DLSmainnettestnet
BSMeT8…2AwoGgmainnettestnet
BsN8MP…eAKMosmainnettestnet
BsnFr3…5WVNqumainnettestnet
BSpQhn…WR8HnXmainnettestnet
BStHzt…8iEhFfmainnettestnet
BsX2TD…T2ATdbmainnettestnet
BTAmyZ…SgyV48mainnettestnet
BtATYj…xJkfygmainnettestnet
BTCfsb…9K6RDJmainnettestnet
BtHcoq…M1XrEmmainnettestnet
BTRiJj…oc5ztDmainnettestnet
Bu3Q2T…Sz84vjmainnettestnet
BU9vtc…hYt2VYmainnettestnet
BUdfU6…UTpMfbmainnettestnet
BUftsw…d2v146mainnettestnet
BUiuQe…ajiSzBmainnettestnet
burncP…W3GmWamainnettestnet
BV1yZc…GLPeLrmainnettestnet
BvJbFk…dHTKyJmainnettestnet
BVSKp2…sX16qGDepartedmainnet47.4%testnet
BVywdt…dbbJCumainnettestnet
BW14iV…s8ASoAmainnettestnet
BW6yyV…iFMdqtmainnettestnet
BWE5jh…YmapPvmainnettestnet
BWhVni…sm2Urtmainnettestnet
BWJCYz…1xdXNJmainnettestnet
BWKWSr…CGLLZFmainnettestnet
BWmTXq…2j6UBomainnettestnet
BWQjLb…tCHfKqmainnettestnet
BWRDk6…dLr5i4mainnettestnet
BxFESH…fgZt1bmainnettestnet
BxHXd1…PrNP4vmainnettestnet
BxJfqB…VcLr7umainnettestnet
BXoNGz…1Xshrkmainnettestnet
BXuJjS…u4xhGHmainnettestnet
BY2Bs1…CojoZ6mainnettestnet
ByCUX9…M2FgRomainnettestnet
BYKHYc…jeEUCYmainnettestnet
BYKkfF…QTrjkRmainnettestnet
BynSHJ…MZsje1mainnettestnet
BYqPdU…KpKAvjmainnettestnet
BYQxiX…Erk8kEmainnettestnet
Bz2EUH…FuStgKmainnettestnet
Bz79qq…JVgbbQmainnettestnet
BzbgUW…CDgwLxmainnettestnet
BZBKHm…c6nGLbmainnettestnet
Bzixo8…YqX3Y7mainnettestnet
BZmxGK…Lgdhv7mainnettestnet
BZpTZw…3KMfnEmainnettestnet
BZPUXN…N4ohbHmainnettestnet
C1ae24…iyEvsWmainnettestnet
C1dBJ3…G1G8pxmainnettestnet
C1eMH6…aYy5mJmainnettestnet
C1G2am…4iD4kDmainnettestnet
C1Ksxr…embLXDmainnettestnet
C1WNPQ…bqdQCTmainnettestnet
C2xjm5…ADbpAYmainnettestnet
C2xXG3…keBngymainnettestnet
C36FuM…r2RG8Bmainnettestnet
C4N7hp…pB7jVmmainnettestnet
C55ieH…DumSKJmainnettestnet
C5R8Ey…sRYbwhmainnettestnet
C5UFCc…xYytaFmainnettestnet
C5x7RC…BUmKkGmainnettestnet
C6HLPX…rwR2Ycmainnettestnet
C6Jib4…rsfFuEmainnettestnet
C6wfXN…LnCxa8mainnettestnet
C74ift…oW9Pqbmainnettestnet
C77xoV…u2FWFamainnettestnet
C7NfWQ…zba9kamainnettestnet
C7zxAv…e3Hr8Fmainnettestnet
C82eXa…WFZHqDmainnettestnet
c83ukp…eYYiH6mainnettestnet
C8jdEx…fpAm8Nmainnettestnet
C8jZmA…mXou3Fmainnettestnet
C8kx9o…QkmLz1mainnettestnet
C8oD37…fxiTYTmainnettestnet
c8uFHP…vrN9R8mainnettestnet
C8Unub…326s1Hmainnettestnet
C8zRPC…mhsqa3mainnettestnet
C9p7fZ…Vj2w3Cmainnettestnet
CA28rQ…qSznPGmainnettestnet
CA41sY…uPTnH7mainnettestnet
Ca6NHu…1jrtxQmainnettestnet
CA9sF5…1FY1sJmainnettestnet
CAJmNH…9aEwwemainnettestnet
CaLUHR…3W4djQmainnettestnet
CAMFz5…BA5uxUmainnettestnet
CanBaU…uuvy9qmainnettestnet
CavAGn…M1RrCqmainnettestnet
CaWXjY…QzChhAmainnettestnet
CbaVc7…2rkomumainnettestnet
CBAXuy…D8Qvgwmainnettestnet
CbdbQR…vefRCBmainnettestnet
CBhfDR…vFJ8x6mainnettestnet
CBMX4U…ugYgedmainnettestnet
CbokDW…C1WFAUmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Slot time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerTrillium’s own boundary, not this site’s: 410ms is where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.