Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,494
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 36 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
BDJ3YN…9adHsmmainnettestnet
BDkvLW…RYgWDwmainnettestnet
BDLCMb…Mk1QoHmainnettestnet
BDLNW7…mxFPnFmainnettestnet
BDN8BH…NWHi1gmainnettestnet
BdNy3o…rVFa2xmainnettestnet
BdvNes…yJfEoUmainnettestnet
BDyzkx…8ENXwzmainnettestnet
Beacon…69pcjzmainnettestnet
BebcuT…SzLVoGmainnettestnet
BEEM5E…HAKuWXmainnettestnet
BefuvG…H1NW8Hmainnettestnet
BeGqZZ…Feui7xmainnettestnet
BEKfHN…bUf919mainnettestnet
BeKGuV…t6AsNSmainnettestnet
BEoB4c…Cx9wSGmainnettestnet
BEQabE…MLYmtumainnettestnet
BeRtYZ…5xnrZPmainnettestnet
beShxg…1QNWUMmainnettestnet
Bf3DZV…PRwk6hmainnettestnet
BfCEMW…T8oGnsmainnettestnet
BfeuY3…QwT3Jjmainnettestnet
BfeYDN…Hig3Qrmainnettestnet
BFoRZQ…AW1A7Pmainnettestnet
BFQJz1…pLLwtPmainnettestnet
BftnqJ…aC9Zjcmainnettestnet
BFwqvk…CxuFQymainnettestnet
Bfwxnd…xG6Ymwmainnettestnet
BgdtRU…QcXuV7mainnettestnet
BGK3Q1…G7LCkKmainnettestnet
BGL7U2…kpCASfmainnettestnet
BGXSjV…VyJ9Dymainnettestnet
BgxzXB…nyEoVgmainnettestnet
Bh22JC…cLJpk3mainnettestnet
BH2G8o…AG1Ezrmainnettestnet
BH47w1…1bnRjZmainnettestnet
Bh8cLa…wokcn1mainnettestnet
BheJv4…wXm1KYmainnettestnet
BHG4L6…LX3ewmmainnettestnet
BHoVA8…UE2Ndumainnettestnet
BhuJ5S…vt1RV7mainnettestnet
BhZheN…GwrAZWmainnettestnet
BibvBK…fvVpqYmainnettestnet
BiF9Zb…SuqhpRmainnettestnet
BiU1DN…tD9Fmkmainnettestnet
BjdCpe…WgvijQmainnettestnet
BjhSGA…12uzuHmainnettestnet
BjLkge…JdxpUrmainnettestnet
bJmApd…Ns4B13mainnettestnet
BJUZ7w…4pwQUrmainnettestnet
BK6QDk…BbXecamainnettestnet
BK7yr7…CqBRB4mainnettestnet
BkbLWz…QSs7Bcmainnettestnet
BkCTX2…iWJYaBmainnettestnet
BkJuwP…dmCH8Ymainnettestnet
BKm9DS…UJTgPzmainnettestnet
BkNZBS…o492ihmainnettestnet
BKPahu…AD1dmdmainnettestnet
BKWgVr…GtbD4jmainnettestnet
BLackZ…ALGg4Cmainnettestnet
BLKo9y…AbLvrBmainnettestnet
BLoCKX…aFgBsMmainnettestnet
BMeSx7…KVJms3mainnettestnet
BMFG3i…niBCEZmainnettestnet
BmgEcJ…FVCMQamainnettestnet
bMic7h…3RzLLsmainnettestnet
BmJrvj…um4DmGmainnettestnet
Bmkxho…xuqadUmainnettestnet
BMN6Gr…8ZTsXGmainnettestnet
BmnhaC…C1YjGhmainnettestnet
BMPjvP…21bNKEmainnettestnet
Bnixcs…gRdyTKmainnettestnet
BNL4Ky…fGhDPUmainnettestnet
BnQnqx…PNw5gXmainnettestnet
BNwRpz…wkfpz4mainnettestnet
Bo9dnC…MqfBgsmainnettestnet
BoDQVL…gLEYfsmainnettestnet
Bok5nk…5NARYEmainnettestnet
BomUmj…YUhfJ2mainnettestnet
Bon6zU…nnp1JVmainnettestnet
Bora78…3wquS9mainnettestnet
BoXbzV…4EGU5Lmainnettestnet
BP5gMV…cKq3fymainnettestnet
BPAd9S…8jNq13mainnettestnet
BPdyV4…fCRPcnmainnettestnet
BpekV4…jbowBgmainnettestnet
BPjchB…qKBN9umainnettestnet
BpLcK9…SxetaBmainnettestnet
BpTgiw…NDvDCNmainnettestnet
Bpx7nU…24iBC3mainnettestnet
BQ4GRw…wswnJHmainnettestnet
BqEHZc…2VXBWymainnettestnet
BQMgbq…WwMHSPmainnettestnet
BqPYvJ…BSUkComainnettestnet
BR1biA…yd6LUVmainnettestnet
Br4E1d…LPStRFmainnettestnet
BR57i3…7L3Ymfmainnettestnet
BrASGW…FDN8NHmainnettestnet
BRozMC…FxXb3Pmainnettestnet
BrStGZ…TajiQ9mainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.