Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,494
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 36 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
988qNR…n1QsACmainnettestnet
98d4Df…oWxeQimainnettestnet
98JF7p…vPsr2emainnettestnet
98Soch…9R1r4Umainnettestnet
98Vo62…yxz8Uxmainnettestnet
98Wqfo…t1oaUWmainnettestnet
993PrU…HLpwHXmainnettestnet
99bR8x…CbZdTwmainnettestnet
9a2cRR…mfCRxJmainnettestnet
9A38uK…JkteiJmainnettestnet
9A5FTr…7k8s2amainnettestnet
9ACgr9…nuJkLYmainnettestnet
9AVQdV…nxqR4hmainnettestnet
9B5KMm…1CtznKmainnettestnet
9bGj86…cXHYq1mainnettestnet
9bjFjW…VbwM9Nmainnettestnet
9bPnYH…skqQDmmainnettestnet
9CAKG1…Hp4Xn3mainnettestnet
9Cb7Zh…4BQ9Semainnettestnet
9CeBHJ…LQDa8Dmainnettestnet
9CeV2U…iubppAmainnettestnet
9CJKNW…XAeVwbmainnettestnet
9CLYMq…ReqyGwmainnettestnet
9cS2cD…Vqodcbmainnettestnet
9CSWzb…5MQPTBmainnettestnet
9D3o3E…gPZJDAmainnettestnet368ms96.0
9dAha7…N34qsvmainnettestnet
9DLZGw…zMBwvzmainnettestnet
9DRnJ9…F3aC3Smainnettestnet
9DXTvs…J46ebwmainnettestnet
9ecGxU…dkDn1Smainnettestnet
9ecKip…Pq5e7gmainnettestnet
9EEtL2…twyPR8mainnettestnet
9eGaMt…3JtxsHmainnettestnet
9eiK4j…jVFSHBmainnettestnet
9eKBAG…7MoxFUmainnettestnet
9eNCB5…GoUst9mainnettestnet
9ERhCi…PNnmnHmainnettestnet
9ERJi8…PWdj78mainnettestnet
9f8LD7…tqiCV7mainnettestnet
9F8Vbb…ifURgUmainnettestnet
9fDcoJ…1xeS2Tmainnettestnet
9fPPg9…nnQkUGmainnettestnet
9Fzu9t…eTTPcHmainnettestnet
9FZUwx…CvCMnomainnettestnet
9gHUpZ…fwwNz4mainnettestnet
9Gthap…8uzX5Mmainnettestnet
9gZqBd…byGEgamainnettestnet
9GzxhB…UpPaJ2mainnettestnet
9H1ULH…DGeRPrmainnettestnet
9HjDxf…KVxSy9mainnettestnet
9HndwX…ccUTaemainnettestnet
9hRoH5…9rBLLGmainnettestnet
9hSKfm…hateXqmainnettestnet
9huFwt…f4KeWXmainnettestnet
9hYeW9…ZEtPhRmainnettestnet
9i7N7R…zPYfqjmainnettestnet
9iDcjj…7mLDRLmainnettestnet
9iLh3s…fHnRvDmainnettestnet
9J2PT4…AfuFG4mainnettestnet
9JAJkm…qGRPbgmainnettestnet
9jgXxe…Xehhupmainnettestnet
9jJ3YR…HmPnK2mainnettestnet
9Jj56v…ZXne94mainnettestnet
9jJE6J…VLpG8umainnettestnet
9JV2z1…sosF8Tmainnettestnet
9jVAcB…DFhe9tmainnettestnet
9JXLVu…QFsPjWmainnettestnet
9kan5U…ecNmpbmainnettestnet
9kc5Nb…FRaD2Jmainnettestnet
9KhnEN…qEJvCnmainnettestnet
9kTTMv…JFe4uDmainnettestnet
9Kzn8v…Qkf7u2mainnettestnet
9L4MvY…PsrkzHmainnettestnet
9LBFK5…eFsXvqmainnettestnet
9Lis59…zLP5fSmainnettestnet
9LV4Su…eftFF4mainnettestnet
9MrqYm…t47nHSmainnettestnet
9msA7w…xbGJ4rmainnettestnet
9mt8Ke…XJStummainnettestnet
9mVNow…u3HhcMmainnettestnet
9n479M…bzLjwrmainnettestnet
9nSMBE…YcUyCUmainnettestnet
9o4GSa…JWV2WXmainnettestnet
9o6NER…3EajvSmainnettestnet
9oFGRT…uCJqc6mainnettestnet
9PHSRy…v6rQCBmainnettestnet
9pjKqF…crmz1Kmainnettestnet
9pmkMo…YafKdumainnettestnet
9PpinK…LVNXJEmainnettestnet
9pq2mA…oQYYgcmainnettestnet
9pYrPC…e2NEsQmainnettestnet
9qcVF4…U8x65emainnettestnet
9qGs4x…mPd1djmainnettestnet
9QJ63r…fS7birmainnettestnet
9qoZMB…EuZgmBmainnettestnet
9QWmvp…gkEmEYmainnettestnet
9QyfPZ…ib2RSUmainnettestnet
9rSfsx…tZd1Zjmainnettestnet
9RsLsF…VPPYJMmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.