Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,494
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 36 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, mean wall-clock duration of a slot, over ten epochs, published by Trillium, and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanTrilliumSlot timeIBRLScore
8mhdbY…W9SV2Lmainnettestnet
8MMYMa…cKciMvmainnettestnet
8mprkS…a2xtu6mainnettestnet
8N7mbm…vVCiL2mainnettestnet
8n9KRH…6GMzvQmainnettestnet
8NHuKB…aGgHswmainnettestnet
8nihRc…h7Hvg1mainnettestnet
8NiMAF…Y1F3Fqmainnettestnet
8NKL4P…gz5Vqjmainnettestnet
8NwvVn…k5EgAAmainnettestnet
8NZfBZ…AJ7RjLmainnettestnet
8o3t9T…Wb7LsLmainnettestnet
8o9F2V…jV2RV2mainnettestnet
8oJWDt…CyGPWqmainnettestnet
8oVCJE…7drGRTmainnettestnet
8oyjJe…jCvSSLmainnettestnet
8PEPnu…WuBz9hmainnettestnet
8PtWvD…ppQNAcmainnettestnet
8Qqr7M…8cEEX4mainnettestnet
8QTa1Z…SnUF2jmainnettestnet
8qZxk9…JsHzkemainnettestnet
8rBs9Q…K8oWYxmainnettestnet
8RnGiv…riVdg5mainnettestnet
8S1WiV…TXJasrmainnettestnet
8S8jkk…q6o4Eymainnettestnet
8scwXM…LjKqv5mainnettestnet
8sfCyk…dFbQzMmainnettestnet
8SHZAo…VCm1QPmainnettestnet
8sincz…VSqdRhmainnettestnet
8sLdJs…Yo8xQqmainnettestnet
8SS6R5…iwqgTXmainnettestnet
8swGzQ…dkHYhqmainnettestnet
8sWVxU…NJiicGmainnettestnet
8SXgZ2…L8nFHzmainnettestnet
8tM5S8…cohD71mainnettestnet
8u4JvL…VW71Lymainnettestnet
8U5eA9…a8Ai1bmainnettestnet
8UEhN1…VWnkQJmainnettestnet
8UGeig…YUpQ6hmainnettestnet
8ugPjn…csTZWAmainnettestnet
8UReTp…v6pSuKmainnettestnet
8uYvLn…ALqVkEmainnettestnet
8uzXeU…XFiE9Bmainnettestnet
8V4eTL…nvuJeRmainnettestnet
8vazAq…kmhxohmainnettestnet
8vqKqy…QohdFAmainnettestnet
8vwmaC…QAGV7Gmainnettestnet
8vwn3w…8bXyQNmainnettestnet
8WBQSo…Kp8RCwmainnettestnet
8wW4h2…3d2rRomainnettestnet
8wxQpb…q4XPwCmainnettestnet
8XaC7j…ZmRHP5mainnettestnet
8xC8Yz…5cBve1mainnettestnet
8xd5vw…rAu1xdmainnettestnet
8xEprR…W8H9Dsmainnettestnet
8XfszM…vsAb7Zmainnettestnet
8XTEa1…FjFrtEmainnettestnet
8XzMcE…KDBR6Pmainnettestnet
8Y7SLe…GErvXUmainnettestnet
8yGYVS…sELYQGmainnettestnet
8YiWk2…ry63jJmainnettestnet
8YJM91…gu6i6Cmainnettestnet
8ymYBu…qV2KnTmainnettestnet
8ynhji…S1h1PYmainnettestnet
8Yq98C…r4sNQ5mainnettestnet
8YQNRq…AQ7JZzmainnettestnet
8yR1A9…YXZ8bnmainnettestnet
8ywTb9…6815sEmainnettestnet
8yy4Q3…852fvjmainnettestnet
8YZpv8…xzj9Y6mainnettestnet
8Yzxvg…hi2Hvemainnettestnet
8zgT2J…26taidmainnettestnet
8ZJuPc…tKiiKpmainnettestnet
8ZkKDo…ntrbCNmainnettestnet
8zY81T…RgFxs9mainnettestnet
917iR2…1nijT9mainnettestnet
91bxxW…kEGJBMmainnettestnet
91ErJa…km1uWDmainnettestnet
91Q2vk…pCnzcEmainnettestnet
922Hom…etjwUcmainnettestnet
9267uy…JSxsjvmainnettestnet
92a3GK…PnEzenmainnettestnet
92tkJj…5Gd6Wumainnettestnet
92VEPQ…aFXTwKmainnettestnet
92voLF…oBYZVHmainnettestnet
93agyy…1rvavrmainnettestnet
93kYdb…UNj3nSmainnettestnet
94Dhg1…aM2yuNmainnettestnet
94NmyA…N4EBY4mainnettestnet
94nX66…VABufRmainnettestnet
95Lvkv…y4PfBTmainnettestnet
95ZRr8…QxBf5dmainnettestnet
96B5dS…dp7gy8mainnettestnet
96D1Sd…a3Yd86mainnettestnet
96HB4m…revrA9mainnettestnet
96MQZ4…XrhZQjmainnettestnet
96ntnt…udxnytmainnettestnet
96yvsJ…9aVfQmmainnettestnet
97XKbS…NzSfvxmainnettestnet
987Q13…H2r7g8mainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Slot time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerTrillium’s own boundary, not this site’s: 410ms is where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.