Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,494
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 36 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
7hRXyU…kWQE87mainnettestnet
7HvUGD…caX3fpmainnettestnet
7imNNs…8EKZGTmainnettestnet
7iRvf7…3W5txfmainnettestnet
7JbE3o…nuMCaJmainnettestnet
7jEWiy…J8b3C2mainnettestnet
7JJsjW…Ztr7U5mainnettestnet
7jxXRs…SiWujNmainnettestnet
7K2Fmd…q9ChBHmainnettestnet
7k2WvT…QPFGxomainnettestnet
7KNaUe…iMcgnNmainnettestnet
7Ku6HP…qYiK7omainnettestnet
7Ltcym…dVAMfHmainnettestnet
7Lx8oZ…xoN365mainnettestnet
7M1hWW…1i3Qucmainnettestnet
7M6nZr…WBdPzzmainnettestnet
7m6rQ4…cvfGH7mainnettestnet
7m8ruG…E35wG3mainnettestnet
7M9VSX…YjqSMimainnettestnet
7mbBqX…pasGotmainnettestnet
7MM1iP…c42Fw4mainnettestnet
7N7KXb…JioavLmainnettestnet
7NCxYc…ut4t6Kmainnettestnet
7NjX5u…dcjXd1mainnettestnet
7NQoxZ…75GDnYmainnettestnet
7nwfUF…jkVoAAmainnettestnet
7o7dPa…rH6khnmainnettestnet
7odWvT…Xq6YMPmainnettestnet
7okPLS…3F2872mainnettestnet
7ovPz5…7nV1yFmainnettestnet
7Pfmtj…ecsF59mainnettestnet
7pGtf1…CFxd2vmainnettestnet
7pjope…hp4ctRmainnettestnet
7PpsLa…jJe1MHmainnettestnet
7Pt6PZ…JhXockmainnettestnet
7q8gQV…fSAWp1mainnettestnet
7qi3W8…gPBXm3mainnettestnet
7QrvUq…VrQobTmainnettestnet
7qVg7V…2GrtJfmainnettestnet
7Qvp9z…vP9xScmainnettestnet
7rjimF…sSD4eumainnettestnet
7rtfMd…Uieatymainnettestnet
7rwLdX…ChUFbAmainnettestnet
7s1G36…jYLwrumainnettestnet
7S8RgK…dFgiXamainnettestnet
7shSky…2JjQJrmainnettestnet
7Sn3o8…gV83QRmainnettestnet
7so7mH…ui2kqPmainnettestnet
7ssufW…gpzQpWmainnettestnet
7Su7D4…CnPUTgmainnettestnet
7Sw9fT…8PYPYLmainnettestnet
7tN9WT…6MWHyNmainnettestnet
7ts4vE…qfzfi1mainnettestnet
7tUdS2…LCoJQnmainnettestnet
7TV3nn…2vBRVYmainnettestnet
7tXbpU…w75FAqmainnettestnet
7TyG6k…9Ej1hSmainnettestnet
7U68Wf…6225Jfmainnettestnet
7uLDMt…P3GMzUmainnettestnet
7uLh29…qj54V6mainnettestnet
7Umo6Q…CdTdVTmainnettestnet
7umQ4C…Grjinmmainnettestnet
7uvqig…Q9JxfAmainnettestnet
7Uww4f…EmxWnbmainnettestnet
7uZNAz…XnCHDKmainnettestnet
7v3ThG…Y4hgD2mainnettestnet
7VAboG…YiW3aRmainnettestnet
7VH7KA…SfWwBxmainnettestnet
7Vhxve…T28DAUmainnettestnet
7Vp9fT…RWkbaJmainnettestnet
7vSrWy…HrSjRqmainnettestnet
7VtCaG…9DTDyJmainnettestnet
7wC3Xk…oEkPSMmainnettestnet
7wGbhK…gDMEu6mainnettestnet
7wQSSc…ud6EH1mainnettestnet
7WRzUu…DVaMbCmainnettestnet
7WXxDJ…44oMpCmainnettestnet
7X1Mv9…ehWrWTmainnettestnet
7xfVvW…HK3jYdmainnettestnet
7XmKqd…Q3tFaPmainnettestnet
7XNSkC…6PeDfxmainnettestnet
7xXP2d…dcj9B7mainnettestnet
7XyxNs…252eWzmainnettestnet
7y8L2d…usa8bbmainnettestnet
7yeDbH…2Q3XEamainnettestnet
7yEpv6…uLCa46mainnettestnet
7yfkZE…6X6Mommainnettestnet
7YQTPu…fgMLs5mainnettestnet
7z4Pr8…2eYJNNmainnettestnet
7ZEGeV…ebzWsemainnettestnet
7ZPnEE…nwquv8mainnettestnet
7ZpzW3…XpB53Fmainnettestnet
814B5g…uJgoWMmainnettestnet
81J1UF…R2xMA5mainnettestnet
81TUbE…cmaPdemainnettestnet
82p9tF…fsqNpamainnettestnet
8393Sy…ubj1tCmainnettestnet
83bbYh…esv2nHmainnettestnet
83bU9L…SmM3WNmainnettestnet
83bwEd…ePDHnYmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.