Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,494
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 36 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, mean wall-clock duration of a slot, over ten epochs, published by Trillium, and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanTrilliumSlot timeIBRLScore
6VwrAi…yE16P9mainnettestnet
6w3mf5…DmSYr7mainnettestnet
6WFLu4…36H4RPmainnettestnet
6WkHdU…muocjBmainnettestnet
6WKw8F…tZtz7dmainnettestnet
6WLinN…ZgxcDZmainnettestnet
6Wyjby…zS74Hwmainnettestnet
6WZScu…ZnJuhUmainnettestnet
6X5DEa…xsvbFgmainnettestnet
6XkaWN…MVF5qSmainnettestnet
6Xuko1…zt1knHmainnettestnet
6Y4T5G…tpMqQ9mainnettestnet
6Ycac5…UB9ozBmainnettestnet
6yFM27…hKxZAPmainnettestnet
6YHMbS…C1Czbbmainnettestnet
6yjecf…ou4EEzmainnettestnet
6YNQg7…WYzkjrmainnettestnet
6YPVHa…HCfYEemainnettestnet
6yQdRz…1jafUhmainnettestnet
6YR2yt…fVYNdSmainnettestnet
6yVX5r…b4Dvzumainnettestnet
6Z1J5K…PFPv7Qmainnettestnet
6ZC5r7…2qwuGamainnettestnet
6ZCpSa…6B2WwKmainnettestnet
6zDrEW…bdSbsQmainnettestnet
6ZhHoz…jL7GYFmainnettestnet
6zLApx…Mar28jmainnettestnet
6ZomMA…DTZMSpmainnettestnet
6ZPLiV…Gam7Jamainnettestnet
6Zqj14…fGn8aomainnettestnet
6zRvqd…WmMEHLmainnettestnet
6ZVosn…kS3xtEmainnettestnet
71gYBF…WNrcpTmainnettestnet
71paL5…CVTqvHmainnettestnet
724MzU…LwyBAQmainnettestnet
727LgV…gTmkiZmainnettestnet
72BfS5…fQ5AhGmainnettestnet
72F29r…FsopCMmainnettestnet
72tju8…Y3hev9mainnettestnet
72XmmN…C9n2w7mainnettestnet
73sfwK…Ft4yJFmainnettestnet
769wcc…29XR88mainnettestnet
76cRnz…sWpqPZmainnettestnet
76ZMzB…ypMsXgmainnettestnet
77777C…6sLKCPmainnettestnet
77b2dc…nxLS6nmainnettestnet
77FHyg…JHXEBumainnettestnet
77w8y4…SvYhnHmainnettestnet
77xozN…rBUAo7mainnettestnet
78bW4n…NsAbTGmainnettestnet
78hBgi…ijZiGGmainnettestnet
78YeMV…kEuQtfmainnettestnet
79z1jR…xvcVbKmainnettestnet
7AfqKG…J5AmAbmainnettestnet
7aNJKd…RyP4Xfmainnettestnet
7As4QD…wmrxvXmainnettestnet
7AXd1m…cXuHPBmainnettestnet
7BKb7U…EVB5qMmainnettestnet
7Bkw99…RG3DXdmainnettestnet
7cpBJF…vDh31Cmainnettestnet
7D614N…5wSji5mainnettestnet
7d8LLg…txEDjsmainnettestnet
7D9vDD…Etg8dtmainnettestnet
7DBc8K…NUGcEomainnettestnet
7dCg4w…Kta7AGmainnettestnet
7dG64S…KxNgpGmainnettestnet
7DnWqk…xutGXGmainnettestnet
7dtLvJ…yDVs8smainnettestnet
7DtNCR…eX3KLwmainnettestnet
7dZ6iX…oYmgTjmainnettestnet
7EANe9…gkdgzYmainnettestnet
7EaPgR…otBJKQmainnettestnet
7ec9fs…7oqSnXmainnettestnet
7eCPrU…6En4Vemainnettestnet
7ecUTx…LTm2Zdmainnettestnet
7eEiX1…KbkNfAmainnettestnet
7eFY8S…i6KCdhmainnettestnet
7ejpBf…8jDy7mmainnettestnet
7EsXf5…BoyfV8mainnettestnet
7f6kAg…95QXmXmainnettestnet
7fjjjb…67FRykmainnettestnet
7Fjuk2…Bq86oWmainnettestnet
7fmMXt…HCxaq1mainnettestnet
7fNnYy…z2MFGBmainnettestnet
7FNw7R…Wx7Hidmainnettestnet
7FxbS2…K6x5ETmainnettestnet
7FxgCd…RkQVSTmainnettestnet
7gbwwu…UsmdUCmainnettestnet
7Gj1Ab…pwGCnFmainnettestnet
7godoq…uYRZr2mainnettestnet
7GQuDV…Xxo5TKmainnettestnet
7GUd6Z…TxD86xmainnettestnet
7gVStz…GFosmZmainnettestnet
7GY4gD…QsHLkhmainnettestnet
7GYvxx…JzF8Pumainnettestnet
7gzrsv…UQ5e5Kmainnettestnet
7hBzQj…sUViiXmainnettestnet
7hCaor…UsVbLfmainnettestnet
7HG1Yp…F9Qe9wmainnettestnet
7Hp1e6…EMT6gtmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Slot time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerTrillium’s own boundary, not this site’s: 410ms is where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.