Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
10,966
of 10,966 on record · 36 departed
Combined
97.9%
median · 390 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
98.5%
median · 390 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
96.6%
median · 511 rated
0%100%
Departed
36
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 98.5% · T testnet 96.6%

All SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, mean wall-clock duration of a slot, over ten epochs, published by Trillium, and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanTrilliumSlot timeIBRLScore
Wdybo4…tqHN9bRejectedmainnettestnet
WENqav…TAV7pmRejectedmainnettestnet
wetkjR…ccFCpoRejectedmainnettestnet
WHALEy…d8h349Retiredmainnettestnet
wixuiF…CjZQPRRejectedmainnettestnet
wK7frz…Bv2cU2Retiredmainnettestnet
wKtSrF…CP96hHRejectedmainnettestnet
WLMyNo…rZC2PpRejectedmainnettestnet
Wn6tNd…zPbmLvRejectedmainnettestnet
WNnXJx…6axZQPRetiredmainnettestnet
WnP8cb…QKshrkRetiredmainnettestnet
wNW19x…gHvgn6Rejectedmainnettestnet
wpd8e4…F97KxbRejectedmainnettestnet
wutm44…jPpzjVRejectedmainnettestnet
WUw4Gj…XTkYx3Rejectedmainnettestnet
wx63uS…r5n2ifRejectedmainnettestnet
WXzaki…2yu8nZRejectedmainnettestnet
Wzcuiy…W8rK1HRejectedmainnettestnet
X1hLYo…ctbJC3Rejectedmainnettestnet
xct35N…EYNnPpRetiredmainnettestnet
xenqbo…Knjr7yRejectedmainnettestnet
XFhUZY…ctgr5oRejectedmainnettestnet
XfYD58…3XsgzyRejectedmainnettestnet
xg223w…SgTEvjRetiredmainnettestnet
XJsCHh…Uiuz6MRejectedmainnettestnet
xmfC46…GAqRnKRetiredmainnettestnet
XMNEPp…wQi4drRetiredmainnettestnet
xosoMS…yQssoxRejectedmainnettestnet
XTkN4i…ozLUutRejectedmainnettestnet
xTNp22…nySwnsRejectedmainnettestnet
xx6jU8…fvQ4CGRejectedmainnettestnet
XxGY9r…yPvBVdRejectedmainnettestnet
XYt5fj…vrV5gwRetiredmainnettestnet
y2j1Lt…8LQjh3TestnetOnboardedmainnet88.8%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
Y3JWEk…gArLsNRejectedmainnettestnet
Y7U6G1…Sn9ky4Retiredmainnettestnet
Y9beMx…59Ya1vRetiredmainnettestnet
Ya2tca…9wwdBWRejectedmainnettestnet
yCdXcR…nqZ58FRejectedmainnettestnet
yDZRsg…aZeB83Rejectedmainnettestnet
YEPQ9h…sZE4EtRetiredmainnettestnet
YFsX55…iKaWGURejectedmainnettestnet
YFX4aZ…QtdzYoRetiredmainnettestnet
yHJ9ax…bGxS5qRejectedmainnettestnet
yjTscC…hshRiSRejectedmainnettestnet
yod8mg…FEugVTRejectedmainnettestnet
YPpYAh…UZjrfMRejectedmainnettestnet
YqipSE…oDgouMRejectedmainnettestnet
YYuVZZ…Ct3an2Rejectedmainnettestnet
YznNVs…5Zvx49Rejectedmainnettestnet
Z8Q34Y…DHxsniRetiredDepartedmainnet78.0%testnet
zeubL8…Gd1jsXRejectedmainnettestnet
ZJsiT3…eTQ29vRejectedmainnettestnet
zmdQpJ…B9UEAjRetiredmainnettestnet
ZNru5q…DpbZrXRejectedmainnettestnet
ZoD1XL…19TdjpRetiredmainnettestnet
zoeS9e…8vgBv2Retiredmainnettestnet
zpsju3…oyswcdRejectedmainnettestnet
ZRX1aK…cUrV31Retiredmainnettestnet
ZU2niz…DJewLfRetiredmainnettestnet
ZvXj4W…fWLRE1Retiredmainnettestnet
zWPom2…3Gf279Retiredmainnettestnet
zxKHxz…sRVZcARetiredmainnettestnet
zypwLA…ZsutMaRejectedmainnettestnet
ZYt3uw…1HySTrRetiredmainnettestnet
ZzMzEh…CGPNthRejectedmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Slot time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerTrillium’s own boundary, not this site’s: 410ms is where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 36 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.