Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
56CdTJ…B3ZCJWmainnettestnet
56t8G5…cYsV4vmainnettestnet
577MVo…WKYBGVmainnettestnet
57dZdB…A1xBxvmainnettestnet
57HYJs…UxJ9Kkmainnettestnet
57qd5R…Nq1urHmainnettestnet
57X8Tj…peZt2Zmainnettestnet
584xzX…8GQbh4mainnettestnet
58DDLi…gY2oqkmainnettestnet
58gfUV…fCS13gmainnettestnet
58hLNt…256aeVmainnettestnet
58xdit…KSpd1smainnettestnet
59JRuT…n8xDQtmainnettestnet
59vMsM…fkJLgRmainnettestnet
5AApGo…GabHPumainnettestnet
5ab9KP…VDZzQcmainnettestnet
5Afkih…iFw5vFmainnettestnet
5aRTHo…AFq61rmainnettestnet
5B743P…L52XdWmainnettestnet
5bcbb8…1RMxzNmainnettestnet
5bDXNQ…BhaEbwmainnettestnet
5BGL8H…cQiLD7mainnettestnet
5Bitxo…mv9WQkmainnettestnet
5BuWwf…getxpbmainnettestnet
5BwCMo…cb3Vhamainnettestnet
5cAbtu…iLHJLgmainnettestnet
5cHd1i…P2QF9Qmainnettestnet
5dF32F…9HWb1Kmainnettestnet
5dnHJo…77BMDdmainnettestnet
5dRP3L…TvZEdTmainnettestnet
5DsL8u…guqXRBmainnettestnet
5dyi59…WsY4Tsmainnettestnet
5Ebkmb…LAGFwsmainnettestnet
5efg1R…b8XujXmainnettestnet
5eMdg2…mdferWmainnettestnet
5eUG3H…2bTQdumainnettestnet
5eWsZG…vohLbLmainnettestnet
5F12CF…eHSupRmainnettestnet
5f5yPT…Z9egxBmainnettestnet
5FSW3z…JEd7s3mainnettestnet
5GDz9W…BC6ZiKmainnettestnet
5GK7gm…pxG7cimainnettestnet
5gyX8Q…Dm7oR3mainnettestnet
5H24AJ…NQd7Hvmainnettestnet
5H2TfF…QW4Kvwmainnettestnet
5HCTso…3eZ6Y6mainnettestnet
5Hg9qZ…W81Zcfmainnettestnet
5HN47x…oNPfxdmainnettestnet
5hyYQc…3vtX8nmainnettestnet
5HZNTh…MbxmQWmainnettestnet
5HZs5V…6fWc8ymainnettestnet
5iPbS7…YhD2PZmainnettestnet
5J1pCi…3TtQzimainnettestnet
5JBBWc…KzJLUxmainnettestnet
5jijXk…a6cBNZmainnettestnet
5JJEm1…wHsLiemainnettestnet
5JphAR…qt13xKmainnettestnet
5JsuQb…kYt8P6mainnettestnet
5JuqWj…PGGugomainnettestnet
5Khjq7…rVZtLkmainnettestnet
5kLYGA…MCkrCDmainnettestnet
5kqWry…3GFebomainnettestnet
5L9pWT…1ha6vtmainnettestnet
5LeLSp…2tmjRwmainnettestnet
5MaZm5…TBmvDFmainnettestnet
5mDia6…ktvKRNmainnettestnet
5MvMuN…U2VHFYmainnettestnet
5N8rWe…W1shrkmainnettestnet
5N9r2n…rrojT7mainnettestnet
5N9UgX…oV9jzumainnettestnet
5NBn6E…XDnhavmainnettestnet
5NcyEt…vfy7JBmainnettestnet
5njBDt…uB5yEHmainnettestnet
5Njv6L…Mdv5UJmainnettestnet
5nkaJE…WYSP8Cmainnettestnet
5Nr1Sq…1LQCA8mainnettestnet
5nup5p…CtTHgqmainnettestnet
5ok53G…iVZw1hmainnettestnet
5onekh…LVDnaHmainnettestnet
5PHn3X…eJni42mainnettestnet
5PiQbu…35RBxFmainnettestnet
5pJMSE…DqPuQEmainnettestnet
5ppgk9…8TuSxLmainnettestnet
5Pr3V4…6enR7omainnettestnet
5pwkQY…dV7QA2mainnettestnet
5Q2aCM…1TzWrrmainnettestnet
5Q4wmP…K9J7SWmainnettestnet
5r1zbB…9366mkmainnettestnet
5r5AFT…bdJ2Dhmainnettestnet
5RepN9…xCc62Smainnettestnet
5RVwMY…2kx4wsmainnettestnet
5sAakx…dGtZ4Cmainnettestnet
5ScWir…SNmksamainnettestnet
5SW9qE…ibv6i9mainnettestnet
5t35VT…BF6awmmainnettestnet
5T7rem…z4Wi53mainnettestnet
5T9HCE…4XkCCZmainnettestnet
5TaLRS…HyCxUqmainnettestnet
5tc8LV…bYj5G2mainnettestnet
5tFbhB…jz2hghmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.