Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
6,985
of 10,966 on record · 2 departed
Combined
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
88.4%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Departed
2
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 88.3% · T testnet 88.4%

Rejected SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
lopywer, RejectedBNDD…JFkmmainnettestnet
LordAeron, Rejected9fLb…buWUmainnettestnet
Lotus, RejectedE3NT…pgfKmainnettestnet
love_not_war, RejectedAYa5…NRnemainnettestnet
Low Fee Validation TOP API 🔥, Rejected3B2m…WynUmainnettestnet408ms96.1
luav34, RejectedCb2E…vpPumainnettestnet
LucaMB, RejectedDzx9…kYMMmainnettestnet
LuCKyC-MaiN, Rejected6K2K…LghZmainnettestnet
luckyx, Rejected3Zqz…miBwmainnettestnet
LucyRussell, Rejected25V3…Luoamainnettestnet
Luka Prefect, Rejected44ZD…ymURmainnettestnet
Luke S, RejectedJ5Mr…ZwNymainnettestnet
LVKV, RejectedPra7…wsvqmainnettestnet
M420, RejectedBvXz…mj9Jmainnettestnet
Macduff, Rejected4xp7…6Cnwmainnettestnet
Mad Lads, RejectedCjmX…cwYDmainnettestnet405ms94.4
madskillz_on, Rejected4xin…xTCbmainnettestnet
MagicNode | 0% Forever, Rejected2vRv…CYusmainnettestnet
magoroff, Rejectednr9J…W2BEmainnettestnet
Maia, Rejected9BcZ…aAqDmainnettestnet
Maj ❤️ Reg, Rejected2npL…A9v5mainnettestnet
majachkov, RejectedDxSz…GueAmainnettestnet
Majestysol | 🔥 0% Fee + ⚡ MEV, RejectedAS4i…Ds5zmainnettestnet413ms93.4
Making Cash, RejectedcZCv…fonnmainnettestnet
maksd, RejectedHqc2…Bnqkmainnettestnet
Maksim Demin, RejectedDNHk…JrK7mainnettestnet
Malenka🏖, Rejected5pWV…cViLmainnettestnet
Maline, Rejected991g…R6Gemainnettestnet
MalinVal, RejectedCZqQ…ifc8mainnettestnet
MambaTrex, Rejected48Da…9VGKmainnettestnet
Manchego | + Rewards, RejectedAuHh…c5Ypmainnettestnet
MangoStake 🥭, Rejected3Gn7…q9zhmainnettestnet
Mantdance, Rejected7R3t…8Agpmainnettestnet
Mar4uk, Rejected6S3H…Hnzhmainnettestnet
marakaya, Rejected6hB7…11bBmainnettestnet
Maresh, Rejected7FGU…2E3jmainnettestnet
marfun, Rejected4oCu…x2jcmainnettestnet
Margineanu Andrei, Rejected6pU9…TJQumainnettestnet
margot, RejectedEik5…WkS3mainnettestnet
MARGUS.ONE 💎 0% fee +MEV!, Rejectedb8Th…1sRSmainnettestnet
Maria B, RejectedDy4r…rLugmainnettestnet
Mariam, RejectedASvB…n3h1mainnettestnet
Marina, RejectedDBvD…jHe3mainnettestnet
Marina BLM, RejectedHbNH…FBQ2mainnettestnet
marisarze, Rejected27Cn…WM4Fmainnettestnet
marisha, RejectedG9XD…VW2Lmainnettestnet
MarKam, Rejected66cD…8rupmainnettestnet
markB, Rejected2qh3…XaY9mainnettestnet
markus, RejectedCrwn…SByhmainnettestnet
Martines, Rejected8S9A…p1hCmainnettestnet
Martinkas, RejectedA3ns…62NBmainnettestnet
Marusia, Rejected6TK3…htq9mainnettestnet
maryg, Rejected4E3u…8xpqmainnettestnet
Massimo, Rejected9Gz4…G14Tmainnettestnet
masterche, Rejected3SL2…2y4Cmainnettestnet
Mataka2, RejectedFYez…djoxmainnettestnet
Matanat, RejectedFrDT…J1Xomainnettestnet
Mathey, RejectedB2Kj…MDwMmainnettestnet
MAX, Rejected5DhE…yps4mainnettestnet
maxblock, Rejected3omj…Kd6Amainnettestnet
Maxime Validator, RejectedG1X8…AfEAmainnettestnet
MayaCain, RejectedG2cc…uVfTmainnettestnet
mazafaka777, RejectedJ3w7…qMKhmainnettestnet
Mazur, Rejected7XoE…QAj7mainnettestnet
MBGBuzzer⭐️, RejectediaME…V4oVmainnettestnet
MCMaster, RejectedB7yZ…ECMAmainnettestnet
meAnn, RejectedJ289…ME9mmainnettestnet
Medias_res, Rejected3Hzz…78zUmainnettestnet
Medved, Rejected5Q1t…yq1hmainnettestnet
MeDviX, RejectedGTB8…5ABUmainnettestnet
megahai, RejectedJ711…PbXkmainnettestnet
Mekhrubon, Rejected86fV…UDxRmainnettestnet
meme32, Rejected6qfp…Esofmainnettestnet
MEOW PAW, RejectedCVsT…pN3omainnettestnet
mephisto1151, RejectedFWDz…i8oumainnettestnet
Mermaid, RejectedDLQ5…t628mainnettestnet
METAops, Rejected8WNk…7dRamainnettestnet
Metisado, Rejected9YGn…TXYvmainnettestnet
metralunabsolstake, Rejected2na3…Q1ASmainnettestnet
mevpus, Rejected4HTZ…Cv9Ymainnettestnet
Mia, RejectedFBk2…3k7Smainnettestnet
midnightCMD, Rejected3VTf…kpfHmainnettestnet
Mihberg, RejectedCXVK…sJDWmainnettestnet
MIHWAS[dc], Rejected4Dbm…gCCWmainnettestnet
Mikhail, Rejected7dSQ…sHZdmainnettestnet
Mikheil, RejectedEUMP…De5Smainnettestnet
Mila, Rejected4K5S…afgvmainnettestnet
Millwall_2, RejectedEXFt…WvDtmainnettestnet
Minilim, RejectedBJij…smewmainnettestnet
Minimyshka, RejectedD4kh…4abSmainnettestnet
MiningLove, RejectedBL3L…k1CTmainnettestnet
Mirador, RejectedDM52…1Uvnmainnettestnet
Mirai, RejectedH5Gf…MfNMmainnettestnet
miriam, RejectedG1Ht…kcn3mainnettestnet
MiX | Nodebook.xyz, Rejected5KYR…FSmcmainnettestnet
Mja, Rejected5oBy…TLcomainnettestnet
MMG STAKING, RejectedAnq3…mJr8mainnettestnet
MMGuru, RejectedEY9d…vdgKmainnettestnet
mmihal, Rejected8Czs…wPHUmainnettestnet
mmm, Rejected7K2v…Apzimainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 2 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.