Skip to content

Validators

10,975 on record · 526 with published grades · grades 02 Oct · membership 03 Oct

In view
60
of 10,975 on record
Combined
—
median · 0 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
—
median · 0 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
91.0%
median · 59 rated
0%100%

median M mainnet — · T testnet 91.0%

TestnetOnboarded SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
Anohin Tolya, TestnetOnboardedGGBn…KfPu—mainnet87.3%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
antone, TestnetOnboarded9JEW…Z9BQ—mainnet99.4%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
AutoStake ⚡️ 0% fee, TestnetOnboarded7knv…Rfkx—mainnet68.0%testnetmainnet pending257ms90.4
Bitwise Onchain Solutions Research, TestnetOnboarded2abw…LeaK—mainnet84.0%testnetmainnet pending257ms81.0
Blueprint, TestnetOnboarded2Wf9…uMDc—mainnet87.9%testnetmainnet pending258ms89.6
DanJ-Validator, TestnetOnboardedATcK…XcLN—mainnet91.0%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
DM WAGNER GROUP, TestnetOnboardedJCZm…RC6C—mainnet86.8%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
EAC, TestnetOnboarded2bpf…Xd2d—mainnet53.3%testnetmainnet pending262ms93.7
Fly to the Moon Validator, TestnetOnboarded9Xhm…7ct7—mainnet100.0%testnetmainnet pending256ms87.0
FrankRPC Validator, TestnetOnboardedDjKL…ugBy—mainnet96.9%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
Ginco Validator 2, TestnetOnboarded9gvr…SdMd—mainnet87.3%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
hz.ms, TestnetOnboardedhzms…83GD—mainnet66.7%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
IBRL, TestnetOnboardeddzBh…RX8Y—mainnet91.0%testnetmainnet pending210ms93.5
Konelia, TestnetOnboardedFNAB…oqWi—mainnet97.4%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
LANDX, TestnetOnboardedLand…y5xx—mainnet32.8%testnetmainnet pending252ms89.7
Metatarz, TestnetOnboardedmtzL…VFNH—mainnet90.9%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
n496f69, TestnetOnboardedADUD…8vp4—mainnet91.6%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
Next Finance Tech, TestnetOnboardedD1Vb…QMC1—mainnet66.5%testnetmainnet pending265ms78.4
node01, TestnetOnboarded74YQ…nV1h—mainnet81.9%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
Nodz, TestnetOnboardedFNTP…fNRL—mainnet88.7%testnetmainnet pending257ms85.0
sergey, TestnetOnboardedDnm8…zHft—mainnet94.9%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
SOL Prime, TestnetOnboardedHSDT…LoQJ—mainnet97.7%testnetmainnet pending263ms74.9
solana, TestnetOnboarded5K6P…nneN—mainnet97.7%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
SolGuardian, TestnetOnboardedAoGG…begH—mainnet81.6%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
SolState testnet, TestnetOnboardedBeSt…FHp6—mainnet98.8%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
Stake Master, TestnetOnboardedD85A…C6ro—mainnet99.7%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
Suoha, TestnetOnboardedsuoH…su5U—mainnet74.1%testnetmainnet pending262ms85.4
turwx, TestnetOnboardedFdPx…5KjK—mainnet94.9%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
Vortex, TestnetOnboardedvxid…C8gp—mainnet0.0%testnetmainnet pending267ms87.5
Vyra Labs, TestnetOnboardedvyRa…qaax—mainnet98.1%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
Yonta Labs - LST 0%Fee MEV -, TestnetOnboardedBeSo…NzXM—mainnet90.5%testnetmainnet pending255ms86.5
12bAYh…vm3VUM—mainnet100.0%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
1XPVms…wUKLKR—mainnet93.2%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
2MFZGZ…4WcMzs—mainnet82.7%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
3EZ3wM…VqaQJh—mainnet92.0%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
3PZSgE…RPAwUn—mainnet70.0%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
4GEEKS…8Zxse2—mainnet97.1%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
4Jr7NP…KM7z3S—mainnet96.3%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
4m8WDV…9gTVMR—mainnet93.9%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
6k6oJd…m2Yb8t—mainnet91.7%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
7jQeCZ…wVFvbo—mainnet95.0%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
81YjSQ…kktngt—mainnet95.7%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
8jPY9p…LTLUCs—mainnet87.8%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
8n9Kh6…rCPoLa—mainnet94.2%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
8xFCZx…vxJfds—mainnet99.4%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
9nt5uE…ctw7RM—mainnet82.6%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
ACFMDu…vWqkcE—mainnet87.3%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
Bcw4XP…iqJ5u5—mainnet—testnet———
CeJjdk…JBcQwC—mainnet96.7%testnetmainnet pending257ms90.2
CircMc…Kb8Ybk—mainnet0.0%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
crux1y…psDdfj—mainnet60.0%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
FbUBAQ…HJWi8H—mainnet92.4%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
FHhNSW…DwyZD7—mainnet90.9%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
FsEq1U…z9qY2W—mainnet0.0%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
FwJzy9…HVVKm7—mainnet79.5%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
ghostR…uTN6Rm—mainnet84.8%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
H8Wa8m…6R7oDL—mainnet97.4%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
Hn1oyu…VjKN6k—mainnet98.4%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
UAV9kp…MfGcnw—mainnet93.8%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet
w5ZdzY…KZFkcZ—mainnet90.3%testnetmainnet pendingnot on mainnetnot on mainnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 428 validators on this roster, IBRL 423, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1046, covering 423validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 526 validators the program has funded, including 0 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,948 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,684. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.