Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
4JVvkG…E2JzYCmainnettestnet
4Jz39v…bc9WdXmainnettestnet
4KK5za…RX6vQgmainnettestnet
4KLFbq…EFA63Rmainnettestnet
4knhLd…QfWxjemainnettestnet
4KQmHw…pKnx6Jmainnettestnet
4kyb7G…YJombfmainnettestnet
4LMGYV…8KVVFtmainnettestnet
4Lmsmu…G5uzVzmainnettestnet
4LuSn1…qwdV8rmainnettestnet
4LX3de…EBjeefmainnettestnet
4M6YGU…VCZTcDmainnettestnet
4M7haw…qjKDj6mainnettestnet
4m9dE6…KUqvupmainnettestnet
4NUzZC…7PMSoemainnettestnet
4P4MB5…DxGAbBmainnettestnet
4peDGj…XHXoaJmainnettestnet
4PHefz…TEDPtxmainnettestnet
4PTSLo…V7xiyvmainnettestnet
4PvhDw…RTRq44mainnettestnet
4Q3s61…FgUsxamainnettestnet
4qBWpF…VF6YJvmainnettestnet
4qdHKf…nxM5w9mainnettestnet
4Qkgmw…SHRw1vmainnettestnet
4QpbC8…rAFDo6mainnettestnet
4QrcCT…5MKyutmainnettestnet
4QsMKu…xUtViZmainnettestnet
4r2mFH…Vmkd8jmainnettestnet
4r6o4F…eTjuuimainnettestnet
4r7eC6…cuWaCTmainnettestnet
4r7JY1…pZ9zLqmainnettestnet
4rHYfM…KfjZASmainnettestnet
4rvcxs…uj1Qrnmainnettestnet
4Rvrjd…peNyeqmainnettestnet
4rZYt1…8cAHRgmainnettestnet
4S46hW…Tt2gWVmainnettestnet
4sabVN…TxCwedmainnettestnet
4SS8pD…WiW8EDmainnettestnet
4SSDh6…NLY3NUmainnettestnet
4tDi5K…ktRZERDepartedmainnet91.9%testnet
4TL86x…6HTpmjmainnettestnet
4tMtxD…Qp2iDNmainnettestnet
4TP3KL…cPuvdnmainnettestnet
4TvmKv…wg3txFmainnettestnet
4txdC8…VYH7ezmainnettestnet
4u1h36…KQbVMtmainnettestnet
4uc3Nk…oDs42gmainnettestnet
4ucJMP…GogFWxmainnettestnet
4upvAK…hZbmJzmainnettestnet
4UZqkm…JazuDVmainnettestnet
4uZz4j…oTiPA5mainnettestnet
4vdWYn…BhHAibmainnettestnet
4VS5kA…R3ejGTmainnettestnet
4VU7Pm…K5XUbDmainnettestnet
4vXCtY…x6GkVqmainnettestnet
4VZ9ii…tokrQ9mainnettestnet
4W7Nqa…BLGrdHmainnettestnet
4WFWdc…MVRYaZmainnettestnet
4WfZnS…Sd5ftbmainnettestnet
4wHi5z…8EoULZmainnettestnet
4WoTbf…DqFGjwmainnettestnet
4wvh1Z…c8sbfxmainnettestnet
4wwHwt…M8E5zZmainnettestnet
4wWPGD…GYC5kkmainnettestnet
4Wxjsh…ZnCkTYmainnettestnet
4x8Wng…8KQCXqmainnettestnet
4xGKAo…mtbDrWmainnettestnet
4xMvFe…JyTk3Lmainnettestnet
4Xskdu…bF6KRbmainnettestnet
4yDEE1…JGa2fvmainnettestnet
4YdXVG…2aYs1fmainnettestnet
4YgWvw…RD28c7mainnettestnet
4YnRk9…TcrSWHmainnettestnet
4ynSRK…LikNfcmainnettestnet
4ypjvR…iEfSKamainnettestnet
4yvqkq…XiVZqdmainnettestnet
4yXdQ1…g5Mgvwmainnettestnet
4ZaM1G…z1yAJCmainnettestnet
4zEQc2…7jbXqUmainnettestnet
4ZG3nu…zZeSTqmainnettestnet
4zKStB…1qpuv9mainnettestnet
4zmYHx…r5HyZMmainnettestnet
4ZNJSe…VbhjpTmainnettestnet
4zTQ8G…UtGnLXmainnettestnet
4ZvjY3…vxhrF2mainnettestnet
4zVWF4…MyWbCtmainnettestnet
51L1K3…4xeqkbmainnettestnet
51Mm1c…4PreMcmainnettestnet
51Q2RE…eJarG1mainnettestnet
53hXhb…ovaEDzmainnettestnet
53LWy5…98HiQSmainnettestnet
53pdHj…XpSYXUmainnettestnet
53uBzb…ENDiwTmainnettestnet
53wqSo…DMhvbEmainnettestnet
53xnMC…UTTp3Qmainnettestnet
54cN87…LNpS7Rmainnettestnet
54oxHS…Ad3pxwmainnettestnet
556fEL…UQ5YgHmainnettestnet
55c2xn…kKcRvBmainnettestnet
55sVMg…2CCHEcmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.