Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
6,985
of 10,966 on record · 2 departed
Combined
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
88.4%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Departed
2
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 88.3% · T testnet 88.4%

Rejected SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
HegX6R…Fojr8cmainnettestnet
HEJzPi…MXsgH9mainnettestnet
HEnK33…xAHTkTmainnettestnet
HEnySM…RXZcdAmainnettestnet
HETWov…WhD2u9mainnettestnet
HFBDDe…WhSXSrmainnettestnet
HfjKZZ…Tjr318mainnettestnet
HfmpsP…9scJWYmainnettestnet
HfTQ81…qYQQDNmainnettestnet
HfWmiF…obLwYRmainnettestnet
HFxwCT…hTfB2Kmainnettestnet
HFynDi…1Wx6q5mainnettestnet
HG3siA…wAbLi5mainnettestnet
HG56ZQ…DqPuBtmainnettestnet
HG5tj8…GBbGhtmainnettestnet
HGAvSL…xYZUnPmainnettestnet
HGB6hE…31xWMwmainnettestnet
HGEu3S…TPHX8amainnettestnet
HGJWdJ…R7Ze9amainnettestnet
HGK5wz…MF4pJcmainnettestnet
HGKf5b…iR1FCvmainnettestnet
HGmeJ6…aDMgGymainnettestnet
HgTenX…XEEjDGmainnettestnet
HgxD5K…fLkCwbmainnettestnet
Hh1QwT…tVLzgrmainnettestnet
Hh8czo…HNnZrYmainnettestnet
Hhfkgd…Go9VnFmainnettestnet
HhGeSb…FZenHFmainnettestnet
HhgSe7…57FeQ6mainnettestnet
HhM6tX…qcNqqBmainnettestnet
Hhn4us…aQ3Uu6mainnettestnet
HhoFHM…ZpU24Mmainnettestnet
HHpWmE…Jwfhurmainnettestnet
Hhxx1B…8pA6hVmainnettestnet
Hi1VaG…vxnTCVmainnettestnet
Hi8UvN…AFVs2tmainnettestnet
HiCKaX…tyUFrdmainnettestnet
HifDPo…5uGDSymainnettestnet
HiL3Ps…yxryj6mainnettestnet
HiLass…CAj8CGmainnettestnet
HiMEAA…EJjfJAmainnettestnet
Hioypp…SfyE2ymainnettestnet
HiqSPB…7UWrxSmainnettestnet
HiyJ8i…SSDcqBmainnettestnet
HjabSt…ePAczNmainnettestnet
HJb6gv…iPdSDPmainnettestnet
Hjc3uu…mH2XrKmainnettestnet
HJeeHR…jPgo1qmainnettestnet
HjFSnM…He3KWsmainnettestnet
HJfTAN…gu26T7mainnettestnet
HjFW2G…b6Zh6Vmainnettestnet
HJL4Te…82FwFAmainnettestnet
HjMoah…aEjbk7mainnettestnet
Hjr2be…YQEmQdmainnettestnet
HJR92F…tNbpmxmainnettestnet
HJsxKu…HfxyRPmainnettestnet
HJvCEq…TUmLYQmainnettestnet
Hk99d3…MRtxj3mainnettestnet
HKAw8j…8np8urmainnettestnet
HkBJAs…oZ21hRmainnettestnet
HkHMSa…RR33uamainnettestnet
HKjEo1…ceScP8mainnettestnet
HKKddo…U5wXYJmainnettestnet
HKMWKV…YGrz4Qmainnettestnet
HKNpVi…PSB3VYmainnettestnet
HKRUH9…UpmZgfmainnettestnet
HKuszT…7LRLcEmainnettestnet
Hkv3Mx…qq1mZ5mainnettestnet
HLedT6…tNPC8Hmainnettestnet
HLht84…hpNpEamainnettestnet
HLk9s7…HRdVFHmainnettestnet
HLNFEq…2FQw5Cmainnettestnet
HLPmN7…tnYi3emainnettestnet
HLTRr4…6nPtsnmainnettestnet
HLv4d6…kCW5VVmainnettestnet
Hm31KC…oKTmcVmainnettestnet
HMDo31…Kcwg6xmainnettestnet
HMfs2d…Pq1ywvmainnettestnet
HMH5N8…xCaq6Lmainnettestnet
HMvSEA…w87qQymainnettestnet
HmX39c…VMKXSymainnettestnet
HMYSk8…2cpdPSmainnettestnet
HNcSu8…n4V5Jxmainnettestnet
HnDhxH…ugM4kRmainnettestnet
HNf5b8…TQV7u9mainnettestnet
HnGx1W…35jnWBmainnettestnet
HNJsPR…9z8DzSmainnettestnet
HNKQXf…TFSBSYmainnettestnet
HnkzME…pjvkvGmainnettestnet
HNLDiu…Ckf2jgmainnettestnet
HnriyK…ExVmLZmainnettestnet
HnrxCQ…6yk3jfmainnettestnet
HNw9xt…c6USx8mainnettestnet
HNz9KC…2UYX9umainnettestnet
Ho4Tsz…eJFtsSmainnettestnet
HoaMTj…sgARsPmainnettestnet
HobSgN…xS1u8nmainnettestnet
HoDDf2…wUCwsDmainnettestnet
HohVYo…pqaqH3mainnettestnet
HomJ97…bxuwDFmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 2 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.