Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
6,985
of 10,966 on record · 2 departed
Combined
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
88.3%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
88.4%
median · 2 rated
0%100%
Departed
2
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 88.3% · T testnet 88.4%

Rejected SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
EPtUS2…n6NpxNmainnettestnet
EPu7uW…A7zEYGmainnettestnet
EPVknm…5N8EjFmainnettestnet
EQ5UmP…EnNxStmainnettestnet
EQaa3V…22uZuimainnettestnet
EQBzHq…HRBpyamainnettestnet
EQc1BN…iaqRR7mainnettestnet
Eqduy5…LBnaSrmainnettestnet
EQg4RD…oqnurdmainnettestnet
EqpipE…tAX9D2mainnettestnet
EQREEh…8NT8ybmainnettestnet
Eqzped…CiqMMEmainnettestnet
Er5f8j…Kgk9iGmainnettestnet
Erc9Uo…WDcTXUmainnettestnet
EReBoR…oA4Uoamainnettestnet
Eri5NG…oDbE9Wmainnettestnet
ErnUUo…BiXx2emainnettestnet
EroSux…YtShQ7mainnettestnet
ERQ7WR…TwWaGnmainnettestnet
ERQn6X…iBGABrmainnettestnet
ERsAfr…FgZcpMmainnettestnet
ESD9Z6…6Bq5iumainnettestnet
ESh344…EUYQw1mainnettestnet
Esh6w5…98MVsnmainnettestnet
ESNarF…zW9pftmainnettestnet
ESnGUP…UsAHaXmainnettestnet
ESngXq…M1tcUumainnettestnet
ESsUXy…YrVGNKmainnettestnet
EswEfe…VxPdrAmainnettestnet
Et42oS…gH7HvUmainnettestnet
ET6sih…txVX6emainnettestnet
EtcbGz…TMHTnGmainnettestnet
ETEjtm…viC5sQmainnettestnet
ETEnQQ…f63qTZmainnettestnet
EtKXHu…MCLybymainnettestnet
Etzouy…zENSd1mainnettestnet
EU6Usi…ppb5iamainnettestnet
EU8b8o…785F1Ymainnettestnet
EUaEDg…qLQPnmmainnettestnet
EuDjjB…8XhKWYmainnettestnet
EUfsA3…6dy6VKmainnettestnet
EUnk3B…iyMLiCmainnettestnet
EuRc16…owsva1mainnettestnet
EuYGWf…CscVtmmainnettestnet
EuyS39…AxKr7Mmainnettestnet
EUZU6W…mtXq1Fmainnettestnet
EVaUYG…uaPE6bmainnettestnet
EvBiNL…8hUbbJmainnettestnet
EVdTT3…TVke9fmainnettestnet
EvTUEC…ZqwY2amainnettestnet
Evuqe4…f4SyrDmainnettestnet
EvzDRk…C7uao4mainnettestnet
EW695F…HuuNCtmainnettestnet
Ewfeej…Egqe6Emainnettestnet
EWoL98…NAYsyzmainnettestnet
EWPP53…YZ6rGamainnettestnet
EWqbeS…jZj4gkmainnettestnet
EX15uF…VXARd8mainnettestnet
Ex2bzJ…4tHQqdmainnettestnet
EX3THP…npdE3Smainnettestnet
Ex58Ek…ygKQeVmainnettestnet
EX82Rq…9A7t1wmainnettestnet
Excz8H…nYqXCBmainnettestnet
EXeWpN…mcW1ucmainnettestnet
EXFfez…4qMYRzmainnettestnet
EXfzEY…6h8YTSmainnettestnet
Exi3wL…iZHLppmainnettestnet
EXiPva…vkQdfCmainnettestnet
ExMrQn…7PukMWmainnettestnet
EXRf2B…1CrYNNmainnettestnet
EXrYqD…eS72WZmainnettestnet
EXUSo3…wm7EHemainnettestnet
Exv1dP…Bnujxpmainnettestnet
ExyEA6…BAww7umainnettestnet
EY3A1e…hBcztomainnettestnet
Ey4bDY…AyrfUDmainnettestnet
EY55aZ…gaud9Dmainnettestnet
Eycr7D…rgFN66mainnettestnet
Eye7jG…wpukvTmainnettestnet
EYqdSB…VHgR15mainnettestnet
EYQVjh…bTt95dmainnettestnet
EyR72K…zSe5G2mainnettestnet
Eyu1Y4…R6gEjHmainnettestnet
EYu3Tb…SCEFHTmainnettestnet
EyXKfM…uXedktmainnettestnet
EzDTEo…QFmuvpmainnettestnet
EzgQw2…pwcrPymainnettestnet
EzKxxP…25a1Nvmainnettestnet
EZqPuc…nStqZ3mainnettestnet
EZUq9T…CFfAtwmainnettestnet
EZx93k…5Q7NhWmainnettestnet
F191pK…u2X4nsmainnettestnet
F1agY6…fFcagmmainnettestnet
F1cML8…FFSBirmainnettestnet
F1Cz89…PdQf7Umainnettestnet
F1d9wt…SmMSW8mainnettestnet
F1hHyC…FgM7G2mainnettestnet
F1jcFv…AsNh7Kmainnettestnet
F1pdgD…9cxGFmmainnettestnet
F1q6Jz…6EWhd2mainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 2 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.