Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
H8u3dt…f97WeVmainnettestnet
H91pk8…9YAsKomainnettestnet
H9e9Hs…arXXp8mainnettestnet
H9J6MK…YJVAYTmainnettestnet
H9METt…gBqv8wmainnettestnet
H9MnZ2…vSsNXkmainnettestnet
H9qT6x…vraHUvmainnettestnet
H9WKZy…iFCPUamainnettestnet
H9wspm…fRWNkEmainnettestnet
HA2EHa…jiCJtNmainnettestnet
Ha6szn…zkEZ2Gmainnettestnet
Ha86HK…JE2BfJmainnettestnet
HAetDT…F5g4d1mainnettestnet
HATNjR…8WMTD5mainnettestnet
HAu3sT…x7PBHrmainnettestnet
Hb49vH…viTRNimainnettestnet
HB7YLJ…6wTY6Nmainnettestnet
HBcrhc…aQxwhpmainnettestnet
HbCsrv…5xcTd6mainnettestnet
HBhWr2…RPshrkmainnettestnet
HBN6qw…L3XbTZmainnettestnet
HBTg4H…UHdoSamainnettestnet
HBzBYS…n7CLbUmainnettestnet
Hc13qV…7C1Kogmainnettestnet
HcMvxv…FFPQ1bmainnettestnet
HCvJvA…S3BLzpDepartedmainnet76.2%testnet
HcYTRx…vGcRKgmainnettestnet
HDeKmP…9hmZbNmainnettestnet
HDggWU…QVPKECmainnettestnet
HdGVHt…ewt7Qqmainnettestnet
HdLF9A…ZFA3VLmainnettestnet
HdpY7J…twcf1tmainnettestnet
HdtkbR…eMHnuRmainnettestnet
HDTrmV…ipRLXnmainnettestnet
HDuGij…9iDA4imainnettestnet
He3c7F…rjbM3Qmainnettestnet
He3pGr…pRQiRomainnettestnet
HEcbnU…AMGeDgmainnettestnet
HEKsbm…VrDmNsmainnettestnet
HepT4H…jSxWmKmainnettestnet
HEUbHz…GAKSeMmainnettestnet
HeX7EM…C8xYVvmainnettestnet
HexgUw…PnwGR4mainnettestnet
HEXJui…QNtHEXmainnettestnet
HEYQgq…RcR68Kmainnettestnet
HEYqtg…TUmFCmmainnettestnet
HfB8m2…B6uECimainnettestnet
HFCnA8…wyMDstmainnettestnet
HFCTdT…meSVbDmainnettestnet
HFETW3…ZG2MM4mainnettestnet
HfixCe…tseKzSmainnettestnet
HFK3Rb…d8KdMkmainnettestnet
HfSh5b…TKcYUxmainnettestnet
Hggubf…12B21Qmainnettestnet
HgiyzZ…bkNRZnmainnettestnet
HGmBaF…UqM4a9mainnettestnet
HGpR8f…4VBUXZmainnettestnet
HhFXDt…w7r4LHmainnettestnet
HHHXAy…HCVRJxmainnettestnet
HHLHy9…RRfAZhmainnettestnet
HHmhU8…q4b4inmainnettestnet
HhmTNE…rxsUbSmainnettestnet
HhsmCU…c6csBzmainnettestnet
HhXTB1…cZctJ7mainnettestnet
HicReE…Mm7uzcmainnettestnet
HiDAyV…N9nTEYmainnettestnet
HiFK8k…Ehnjcxmainnettestnet
HiQMHV…pdKhQNmainnettestnet
HiW1Ja…dA3ChRmainnettestnet
HiyiT5…Q7nTALmainnettestnet
Hj2SDE…aKmR8Vmainnettestnet
Hj3Akx…spKS9imainnettestnet
HJetWd…baEshbmainnettestnet
HJkprs…SdcXfimainnettestnet
HJnVEt…fkjAfRmainnettestnet
HJo4sT…5jDeMomainnettestnet
HJxDRr…tPPadmmainnettestnet
HjXMC9…DnHcwRmainnettestnet
HjyXDM…GoHYzUmainnettestnet
Hk8Vb8…d4D8TPmainnettestnet
Hkh1Av…BvnMDvmainnettestnet
HKHs6Y…dw5eYGmainnettestnet
HKL8Wk…LFMwJamainnettestnet
HkpgaP…qYp5nMmainnettestnet
HKtyJ4…cU1ahMmainnettestnet
hL7Epe…zknCwrmainnettestnet
HLrtuv…KRhgdpmainnettestnet
HLuAqd…5zttZHmainnettestnet
HLvbcj…ViYBskmainnettestnet
Hm7Av5…DhHDBXmainnettestnet
Hm9UU9…CCAdTmmainnettestnet
HmgjJL…ULh2qtmainnettestnet
HMJdhJ…gaUpNLmainnettestnet
HmMo6K…WWRHExmainnettestnet
HMQAHE…jyturFmainnettestnet
HMxF9E…VSVzUGmainnettestnet
HMYDnC…UiAUhSmainnettestnet
HmZs8C…joZD3mmainnettestnet
Hn49oe…VBNdXBmainnettestnet
HNccAC…q7fbyUmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.