Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
Gn42X1…RDk1f3mainnettestnet
GNDngX…iujvdamainnettestnet
GNFVUd…moyZ7omainnettestnet
GNj1Ak…VnK61wmainnettestnet
GnMoVX…X4xCH1mainnettestnet
GNncyZ…2EutEmmainnettestnet
GNRucT…TRaocDmainnettestnet
GNSzrc…wLyMBbmainnettestnet
GnV5uw…uLaZPamainnettestnet
GNwwAX…4QJLhJmainnettestnet
GnzZHy…hm4g5vmainnettestnet
Go7gE6…W63HRMmainnettestnet
GoBioN…GaDGp6mainnettestnet
GoGB7R…1Xap2Gmainnettestnet
GogXXZ…Zbz9H5mainnettestnet
GoiUzn…NAZFLxmainnettestnet
GoKdmw…h8osJumainnettestnet
GoxRp4…pFU8nbmainnettestnet
GPmwS4…3qFtFMmainnettestnet
GPqpn9…vFrBVomainnettestnet
GPxyZ8…z8T4N3mainnettestnet
GPZzZ1…75J752mainnettestnet
GqC5An…awKBj7mainnettestnet
GQeUEW…LdxhRumainnettestnet
GQEXBc…nb9Apimainnettestnet
GqJ26U…hVurBLmainnettestnet
GR5h9i…1621eyDepartedmainnet86.0%testnet
GrA8Ey…ERpc3Fmainnettestnet
GRDMMD…KyyjRvmainnettestnet
GRenma…XA9rMkmainnettestnet
GRh4Kx…3iVwyomainnettestnet
GRHb7y…QuMh6Bmainnettestnet
GRjeop…2ymVKdmainnettestnet
GRoc3S…D5pZ5xmainnettestnet
GRYBLa…jw71ddmainnettestnet
Gs9qma…TBh1somainnettestnet
GSb9qQ…9eC2Gtmainnettestnet
GsCQL2…g5swDKmainnettestnet
GseQbd…6NsqVemainnettestnet
GSjZei…CwmybMmainnettestnet
GsowjU…aJcqEZmainnettestnet
GSUC1y…6CesNqmainnettestnet
GSV22P…vSzgxymainnettestnet
GsvNnz…DZgbRymainnettestnet
GSyf4u…VaJy13mainnettestnet
GsZtC2…yXcec7mainnettestnet
GTKP3g…7cQDaemainnettestnet
GToos4…pW8cB1mainnettestnet
GtwXWA…xV4pRymainnettestnet
Gu9n5H…o5bg1umainnettestnet
GUACwf…wFGk28mainnettestnet
GuC84N…3QRrKfmainnettestnet
GUDM52…gTv3gumainnettestnet
GuLoko…coU7Kzmainnettestnet
GUqfsA…8P6Xrqmainnettestnet
Gv8LLJ…qNHoznmainnettestnet
GvCkWt…UZsUKZmainnettestnet
GvmiZz…Pes59Kmainnettestnet
GVNDVM…YP38o3mainnettestnet
Gvny8S…KCx6eVmainnettestnet
GVs2db…yVnbtvDepartedmainnet65.5%testnet
GVx6jP…swGEzomainnettestnet
GVXocL…wV6yGkmainnettestnet
Gwctoa…qDHrYZmainnettestnet
GwdnFL…gbK1Krmainnettestnet
GwPkur…H1ZQhXmainnettestnet
GwQdBX…XQxMiBmainnettestnet
GWxQpw…oCt6ehmainnettestnet
Gwy9zQ…w57wWNmainnettestnet
Gx1cnZ…iptnwMmainnettestnet
Gx64As…qrX4VDmainnettestnet
GXrM6w…ifv3oKmainnettestnet
GXTxSZ…kM1hzZmainnettestnet
GXv4Pf…HskyYemainnettestnet
GY2uXr…Ljp8mYmainnettestnet
GY8gv4…uw23cYmainnettestnet
GYL1sn…5oVFyWmainnettestnet
GYmnG5…pTdan5mainnettestnet
GynBdT…fDz58Dmainnettestnet
GYXvAX…y6qZsamainnettestnet
GZnnrD…RbPbbJmainnettestnet
GZPvJN…nUhRA5mainnettestnet
H1aEvj…2mMegwmainnettestnet
H1dGnB…S684Ehmainnettestnet
H2gx5G…wLPQtTmainnettestnet
H2NkMv…oozUjimainnettestnet
H2vD9p…BxoDm3mainnettestnet
H489iZ…sfRGNpmainnettestnet
H4AG6C…DhwK1Bmainnettestnet
H58BrG…sGmBH9mainnettestnet
H5GBZH…RfoqXzmainnettestnet
H5hede…57Z8zgmainnettestnet
H6jbfg…ZAsScSmainnettestnet
H6L5br…TqZgummainnettestnet
H6zHSu…5aYH2Emainnettestnet
H7LMqr…aVfG1tmainnettestnet
H7PTvf…9frQv8mainnettestnet
H7SHpR…ByKzmamainnettestnet
H8okrZ…7KMWN6mainnettestnet
H8Puhs…oj8t7Qmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.