Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
MAX APY - 0% Fee, Retired5sDc…6DcAmainnettestnet
Max Validator, RetiredBZ2t…TvAqmainnettestnet
maximxmoroz, RetiredHVuE…Uktkmainnettestnet
melea 🚀 SOL 🤑2K, Retired6TkK…e1eamainnettestnet408ms93.8
mindstyle, RetiredDTF5…JpR2mainnettestnet
Moon Validator | MEV, RetiredFkC3…xyPVmainnettestnet
MoonCat, Retired72i2…aSMnmainnettestnet
MORIARTI, RetiredDzq9…jVSBmainnettestnet
mSOL, RetiredHpsz…vMhymainnettestnet
Mukh.tar, RetiredEbTx…v8qumainnettestnet
munis, RetiredCTiR…YeY4mainnettestnet
N S, RetiredJ2ac…5aXZmainnettestnet
nabe796, RetiredFQ9i…JUnumainnettestnet
NannyNode, RetiredFPPo…Kwb8mainnettestnet
Nansen | Stake to Stack Points, RetiredCoG8…RgmJmainnettestnet405ms95.3
Nasu Validator, RetiredDQdB…XBQumainnettestnet
Natalya, RetiredFCzY…mxDMmainnettestnet
Natalya Butuyeva, Retired2uS1…ehXCmainnettestnet
Nautilus, RetiredCj9U…rxWTmainnettestnet
Nautilus Navigator, RetiredFB2W…UAgvmainnettestnet
nik4, RetiredHs7i…1tHimainnettestnet
NITAWA, RetiredEtfa…az1omainnettestnet
Node Doctor, Retired8GUC…dDedmainnettestnet
Node Integration Validator, RetiredsoM3…oiSamainnettestnet
NODE WIF HAT, RetiredABoQ…zYzhmainnettestnet
Node1, RetiredGK2Y…m3Dkmainnettestnet406ms92.8
NOVY, Retired7Gje…MBksmainnettestnet
Official DogWifValidator - DFDV Powered, Retiredwifw…DPEcmainnettestnet
Olga Koval, Retired6aW8…TjzDmainnettestnet
Olha-best, Retired4mkN…Cu9Kmainnettestnet
olikluk86, Retired31vn…gbSwmainnettestnet
openbitlab, RetiredHnLZ…4hNLmainnettestnet
Opt52, Retired77xR…Gtnwmainnettestnet
Osaka Solana Validator, RetiredAL88…YSRamainnettestnet
OtterSec, Retired3psx…sMQWmainnettestnet407ms80.5
Overclock, RetiredC1oc…yzcAmainnettestnet409ms80.6
PaDvo, RetiredBJaf…MgtLmainnettestnet
pafnutij, RetiredJ2of…Bonamainnettestnet
parik_main, RetiredH4qE…3eKFmainnettestnet
Paullp, Retired6ECY…DS31mainnettestnet
Payler, Retired5gYo…6d4Qmainnettestnet
peacesol, RetiredFv2n…bCf2mainnettestnet
PeakX, RetiredGarx…gw2bmainnettestnet
Permissionless Labs, Retired3iRF…gkznmainnettestnet
Pikachu, Retired5qGZ…Cx8fmainnettestnet
PixelLabz Validator | Mainnet, RetiredPLab…qpyZmainnettestnet
Pizza Pool, Retired8Ua6…mjynmainnettestnet
PleaseMilkMe, RetiredETWk…bxBjmainnettestnet
Pr-k_Zadov Mainnet, RetiredFgHW…uysfmainnettestnet
Prematurata, RetiredDF6R…Whpwmainnettestnet
Protofire, RetiredHE4H…TgJnmainnettestnet
Pumpkin's Pool ❤️, RetiredPUmp…4xjbmainnettestnet405ms93.1
QuantumElevator™, Retired3kiy…pb7xmainnettestnet
qwertys318, Retired2Ce1…Zo5vmainnettestnet
Rapid1923 Validator, Retired2Yfw…978Dmainnettestnet
ratatujj, Retired4wEY…bjrbmainnettestnet
RECTOR NODE, RetiredREC4…syskmainnettestnet
redelegate | SonarWatch, Retiredsw11…zjCwmainnettestnet
Republic Runtime, RetiredBngW…bJRUmainnettestnet
Rich Buratino, Retired5Phs…2BYTmainnettestnet
Roach, RetiredHYXE…NE7Pmainnettestnet
ROCKnSOL, RetiredF526…4Q9Nmainnettestnet
Ropero, RetiredEv6u…2WpDmainnettestnet
RSO Validator, Retired6Ejf…Qs1Vmainnettestnet
ruslan77, Retiredq4JT…gZ2Rmainnettestnet
Saltee [0Y], Retired8Ey5…mJpxmainnettestnet
Sanctum, RetiredLSTQ…PAJpmainnettestnet
Sega, Retired3hXh…ebrfmainnettestnet
semax validator, Retired5ADZ…W3gYmainnettestnet
Serenity, Retired3YRy…ccXfmainnettestnet
serenity, Retired6XdV…pbksmainnettestnet
Sergiololpro, RetiredEGxR…ky9Zmainnettestnet
Sheremet, RetiredpvYG…uJD4mainnettestnet
shiroperu, RetiredFeHu…2bhDmainnettestnet
Shishaonthespot +MEV|JITO|PAL ✅, RetiredCJtJ…Nen2mainnettestnet
Shrimpetta, RetiredDzcA…gYnnmainnettestnet
shurik, RetiredCZ7S…jBHmmainnettestnet
Sign.net, RetiredWEBc…9YBimainnettestnet
SLC Validator | Jito+MEV, RetiredFLVg…kwQJmainnettestnet
SMCvalidator, Retired6q4n…9qddmainnettestnet
Sobolev Nikolay, Retired9FmS…cHYfmainnettestnet
SOfT, Retiredsoft…yTUVmainnettestnet
SOL de Lisboa, RetiredHYLo…ZQFemainnettestnet
Solana Compass 🧭 Solana For The People, RetiredCMPS…6gbdmainnettestnet404ms94.8
Solana Cosmin, Retired6dPJ…ki1omainnettestnet
Solana Iservers, Retired4sSo…wHBGmainnettestnet
Solana Meme Coins Validator, RetiredGkEN…f1hKmainnettestnet
Solana State, Retired9hrb…rGn3mainnettestnet
Solens, Retired2HuC…Sdbjmainnettestnet
SoLiD, RetiredSoLi…ZvPBmainnettestnet
SOLidarize.me 🤝🌍 - Do good for the world!, RetiredSoLi…rk1Ymainnettestnet
SolLana, RetiredGqDC…jPUfmainnettestnet406ms94.9
Solmate - RockawayX powered, Retiredt23p…mateDepartedmainnet35.8%testnet357ms89.9
solomoon, RetiredDWaY…rKrwmainnettestnet
SOLrainDrops, RetiredEWAR…gQ6mmainnettestnet405ms93.4
SolSheen 💞, RetiredDvSM…SYtVmainnettestnet
SolWizard, Retired9oGW…KVAcmainnettestnet
SolWorld, Retired7qto…Z2rGmainnettestnet
Soph Validator, Retired4yR5…i3Ppmainnettestnet
Spartak, Retired6gBn…U5kBmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.