Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
DUXsGJ…PkGMphmainnettestnet
DUyrpL…iuX77vmainnettestnet
Dv4mow…hYxQ2Bmainnettestnet
DvA6bp…LsJpVDmainnettestnet
DvJ5UX…Z6AeWumainnettestnet
DvUGnD…Kf1Z3Wmainnettestnet
Dvw3Nw…N1kNazmainnettestnet
DWACUo…bSzCXbmainnettestnet
Dwbd2D…h2qSWCmainnettestnet
DwoFe1…DKY2UCmainnettestnet
DWrcuW…SGtxjSmainnettestnet
DWuhhN…XUF2symainnettestnet
DwUmZ3…g4NuQ6mainnettestnet
DX4V2z…vHiNKtmainnettestnet
DxmNAb…4Cineamainnettestnet
DxntFi…mFPxCvmainnettestnet
DxuLvk…nihX6Jmainnettestnet
DXzke7…UuJMxGmainnettestnet
DyoU98…GCaauEmainnettestnet
DYPpAC…LfrRdEmainnettestnet
DzgymP…r1iqS6mainnettestnet
DZRHyD…8fjquXmainnettestnet
DZwKi2…45PdHjmainnettestnet
E1VEXG…EiYbNvmainnettestnet
E1WWCx…6HfUQ3mainnettestnet
E24gtu…sagzsVmainnettestnet
E2fpHK…EChNajmainnettestnet
E2Ku7b…Vg6khSmainnettestnet
e3cHVr…tAxwBCmainnettestnet
E3DMgf…hgVYsqmainnettestnet
E3jvk6…1oCDFtmainnettestnet
E3ZBTF…3dABLrmainnettestnet
E4Cuyq…zHQpazmainnettestnet
E4diEk…AWEaoumainnettestnet
E4Jt1e…jHNhXSmainnettestnet
E4P2jb…rAJWpamainnettestnet
E4WTsB…sfSn64mainnettestnet
E514nW…X7aGyRmainnettestnet
E52Bp7…Mi3Lpqmainnettestnet
E52t8n…67h9W6mainnettestnet
E5jxRu…hRrtoPmainnettestnet
E5r3Vi…iteC4Fmainnettestnet
E5Y6Rk…gBBefVmainnettestnet
E6cyDd…KrrAktmainnettestnet
E6HfY3…Po6Zkfmainnettestnet
E6iXBo…BAezWQmainnettestnet
E6pSQ3…SXxQ8Hmainnettestnet
E6SWni…22gD9Qmainnettestnet
E797dP…5jXpwHmainnettestnet
E7Diba…3yPnYDmainnettestnet
E7LwAL…NSvrznmainnettestnet
E7UTfx…Na6hfumainnettestnet
E7Vaeg…fd6L8amainnettestnet
E8aDon…xUEnvdmainnettestnet
E8JJ3p…cZpiNamainnettestnet
E8TFLu…T84ZSVmainnettestnet
E9jMJh…h3SqkDmainnettestnet
E9s6Gb…8YSeTTmainnettestnet
EADpDk…QogPGmmainnettestnet
EadsH3…x95Uv4mainnettestnet
EaHxXe…wg2kQamainnettestnet
EAQ3w5…1JLVS5mainnettestnet
Eau9Ku…F5vS2Dmainnettestnet
EaYb3z…58SNPwmainnettestnet
Eb2FWr…ik6avDmainnettestnet
Eb3A3c…XhaUAamainnettestnet
EB7Eow…B57pvGmainnettestnet
EbbEdb…wRQbM6mainnettestnet
EbRDiX…SgCgSVmainnettestnet
EbwgR8…qUiv13mainnettestnet
Ebz6UN…HGiz2vmainnettestnet
Ec2vpR…QLshrkmainnettestnet
EcdsVW…zijL1Cmainnettestnet
ECQRSu…Z31cobmainnettestnet
EctePL…U5tuLdmainnettestnet
ECZJDf…QgKsdTmainnettestnet
ED1eV8…VFCgMemainnettestnet
Ed5otF…asXeezmainnettestnet
Ed98sv…WcdRp2mainnettestnet
EdfRaF…8YKrJAmainnettestnet
EDGiBF…TCUa5Ymainnettestnet
EdS2oL…gGPZwHmainnettestnet
EDWk9o…jYqpEwmainnettestnet
Ee1pSu…t8wbSVmainnettestnet
Ee8b3u…PRsvXbmainnettestnet
EEaTTk…2jX81nmainnettestnet
EEfHu5…PgBsKGmainnettestnet
EegLUm…wvrFmZmainnettestnet
EeKmue…oTYLVRmainnettestnet
EEN4pf…QhRascmainnettestnet
EerSdV…ZaD6itmainnettestnet
EEsFgd…TVYPSVmainnettestnet
EF6oGL…Ni1zKZmainnettestnet
EfadsS…PjCmfimainnettestnet
EFbkbc…ehQPw6mainnettestnet
EFbsjx…ADyrYEmainnettestnet
EFMW3C…v4scdwmainnettestnet
EfNUvJ…hZeYMWmainnettestnet
EFpjyc…FNaBDsmainnettestnet
eFrGe4…Wvd3iamainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.