Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,494
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 36 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
DeH429…CjwnCamainnettestnet
DENaWu…kRHcjgmainnettestnet
DeRKE4…8v7GgGmainnettestnet
DETZ2D…WuxHNomainnettestnet
Dey6V8…7m9x8Umainnettestnet
DezE7T…UUoYQqmainnettestnet
DF8243…RagJm5mainnettestnet
DFAEPk…ZhpAwEmainnettestnet
DFkyUp…AwGbJwmainnettestnet
DfqMvg…xyZ5FSmainnettestnet
DfVBcc…Mpc1yemainnettestnet
DFXGhM…MWu2Tdmainnettestnet
DGg5Bu…UVjbE6mainnettestnet
DgiLp2…b8d3kHmainnettestnet
DgS6Bs…k3rezumainnettestnet
DgyHhh…xEDAewmainnettestnet
dHhxnx…ktRSSymainnettestnet
DHNPXg…Mje43hmainnettestnet
DHpQQu…t7TyY7mainnettestnet
DhUiUH…b7JZunmainnettestnet
DHuNZA…N7TaFpmainnettestnet
DHUZtA…NSRP5jmainnettestnet
DhX5NN…t958nCmainnettestnet
DigiCo…tbyipomainnettestnet
DiVNZo…6YWoWCmainnettestnet
DjbbdD…yaTDE7mainnettestnet
DjFJQQ…TB7wGmmainnettestnet
DJHkrU…ADepC4mainnettestnet
Dk7t1M…ZZSsAumainnettestnet
DkNqTd…vsgv9Gmainnettestnet
DKSy9m…gDLGN8mainnettestnet
DL3THn…kPPWdwmainnettestnet
DL5HLC…u96md8mainnettestnet
DL6wsx…h4U5M3mainnettestnet
DLFZoQ…w87tnomainnettestnet
DLQRwf…jhK2msmainnettestnet
DLxFyp…JMpQ4amainnettestnet
Dm3XhJ…4dozGUmainnettestnet
DmC55R…gQU9hxmainnettestnet
DMda5f…1Tv6xPmainnettestnet
DmDjUm…KP1hJVmainnettestnet
DMmLYT…bCYYGwmainnettestnet
DMN5oH…BjLCcqmainnettestnet
DMrNLW…ei7hbomainnettestnet
DmYkcn…2Js16Tmainnettestnet
Dn8LdV…Y72rdqmainnettestnet
DnaxbE…mGsQ7xmainnettestnet
DnnvfC…UDtSHXmainnettestnet
DnrsDs…hvrieKmainnettestnet
DNWKLW…dxFYSWmainnettestnet
DnWqTK…iKEVQrmainnettestnet
Do9JV3…SX4vNimainnettestnet
DoFvZD…hz4WuRmainnettestnet
DoLxPi…EDYF6smainnettestnet
DoWkvd…C6A9MJmainnettestnet
down9v…7gdhmDmainnettestnet
DpFHiS…XbMAbumainnettestnet
DPnDMk…yYGD7kmainnettestnet
dPoe8m…AC49rrmainnettestnet
DpRFWX…SY2LSnmainnettestnet
DpUVhC…A7tmsGmainnettestnet
DQ1DuT…6ZXRA3mainnettestnet
Dq1Mq4…KkiUCWmainnettestnet
DQ2y4S…wKiH8Emainnettestnet
Dq3YBV…n5v56Rmainnettestnet
DQ9EBn…ax4w2smainnettestnet
DQdtRa…gtZWTWmainnettestnet
DqestW…J7hwBkmainnettestnet
DqiwPW…wwRpg3mainnettestnet
Dqo5EQ…yRxi5xmainnettestnet
DqQwxd…vvtCsomainnettestnet
DqUA3C…dugCVamainnettestnet
DQv4e6…PnfSARmainnettestnet
DQZJsZ…ygQEFxmainnettestnet
Dr2Pyi…S3Vfpumainnettestnet
Dr5CLx…Z39NJkmainnettestnet
DR8KgQ…hnbnYNmainnettestnet
Dragon…naiBWCmainnettestnet
DRaTr2…xxpphPmainnettestnet
DRG6ah…DDJA3Fmainnettestnet
Drr9C7…2dfCCcmainnettestnet
DRt5xL…yKd4nEmainnettestnet
DrYRCK…zbgRecmainnettestnet
DS5vvj…zMim4hmainnettestnet
DSKkHR…BfAM1fmainnettestnet
DSSfBH…xktu5pmainnettestnet
DSUpzk…gmWdGWmainnettestnet
DTCizt…ifLHswmainnettestnet
DTELyk…fz5JLbmainnettestnet
DtkjNk…oqZ3eLmainnettestnet
DtnmpN…Bg9DyCmainnettestnet
DtPLyo…f9zk1qmainnettestnet
DtPZSB…6Wrw3Gmainnettestnet
DTvny3…wkB1wWmainnettestnet
DtY5Bz…S2JANAmainnettestnet
DtZwuS…pmHbcVmainnettestnet
Dua2Af…UESP8imainnettestnet
DUbBPu…RpXdj2mainnettestnet
DUbr7U…29Razgmainnettestnet
DuHHUe…9Dx32Gmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.