Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
Code du feu, RetiredEmp3…t3EUmainnettestnet
coinmeca, RetiredsotE…zGunmainnettestnet
comr8_nga, Retired3Ng7…Xhd5mainnettestnet
CosminS Validator, RetiredAKxF…5C58mainnettestnet
Craze validator, Retired92RW…Xiihmainnettestnet
CRU Validator Testnet, Retired641C…bn85mainnettestnet
Crypto Champion, RetiredHUX9…fWzMmainnettestnet
Cryptoleg, Retired8NP2…Dvtxmainnettestnet
Cryptolga, RetiredE3S6…cmcDmainnettestnet
Cryptonic, Retiredrusx…xKhxmainnettestnet
Cryptorill, RetiredCjBY…nt6jmainnettestnet
CyberGate Labs MAINNET, Retired889L…yd56mainnettestnet
Daisy Node, RetiredDais…nhMpmainnettestnet
DAZH, Retired3Ewp…ixJbmainnettestnet
DeFi Dev Corp (NASDAQ: DFDV), Retired9r2C…iPLamainnettestnet
del, Retired7vvw…KiEcmainnettestnet
DEP-Validator, Retired26mD…WY8gmainnettestnet
DigitalStream, RetiredHotX…bqBomainnettestnet
Dima Tide, RetiredA8id…BzZ6mainnettestnet
Dolphin, RetiredDLPH…iKmvmainnettestnet
Drift, RetiredDrif…xatzmainnettestnet360ms79.7
DSRV, RetiredDSRV…RY4Emainnettestnet
EdoYiM & Cyf, Retired8zsF…2eTGmainnettestnet
Egor - Low fee + MEV, RetiredDRCE…khGHmainnettestnet
Eiernaggen, Retired3Jxn…KF6Qmainnettestnet
Elena.Cyprus, Retired2s9v…6MzMmainnettestnet
Enigma, RetiredA4ad…nyG5mainnettestnet
eska, RetireddXtz…rYBqmainnettestnet
Fartcoin Community 💨 11%+ APR, Retired7b7V…ykX2mainnettestnet
Faust, Retired311y…xy5ymainnettestnet
feda, RetiredXrh9…qxA8mainnettestnet
Feoktistov, Retired3HHa…rSgDmainnettestnet
Figment, RetiredFd7b…69Nkmainnettestnet407ms95.8
FilatovDM, RetiredGdo6…CGbJmainnettestnet
firstblock.network, RetiredEqxC…Y6qimainnettestnet
Freewheeling, Retired8W5y…9qBBmainnettestnet
fshark, RetiredEemm…PnhGmainnettestnet
FusionTechNode, RetiredHeXQ…sV2Lmainnettestnet
GameLife, Retired37Li…gZYLmainnettestnet
GameValues , RetiredFf6q…FYaRmainnettestnet
GERvalidator 🇩🇪, RetiredCHaH…6JWHmainnettestnet
GMC Validator, RetiredCXRe…8Lkvmainnettestnet
GO2Pro, RetiredAtcX…3EoHmainnettestnet
GoBit, RetiredFgF4…8eKSmainnettestnet
Gorshok, Retired7Do3…eAg6mainnettestnet
goto5k, RetiredBwxh…iAoUmainnettestnet
GRAFSOL, RetiredD45G…WfGrmainnettestnet
Gritsly Nodes, Retired4oWa…oFZSmainnettestnet
gunray, Retired8gcM…NoTtmainnettestnet
GVCmd, RetiredGbHe…4cismainnettestnet
GXFC Validator, RetiredFb77…iCSfmainnettestnet403ms94.1
Haus – Best APY & No Fees, Retired7y5V…kWRLmainnettestnet419ms73.8
Helius, RetiredHEL1…e2TUmainnettestnet379ms91.9
Henry, RetiredGMJT…5PWymainnettestnet
Hinode Technologies, RetiredFFev…iYnrmainnettestnet
Humb, RetiredFXfN…Actwmainnettestnet
Igor Gusarov, Retired85yW…d7aimainnettestnet
igreq, RetiredB6zL…tq4Amainnettestnet
Iharek, RetiredGvqF…qBZamainnettestnet
iluxa, Retired5sQq…EwXimainnettestnet
Inari, RetiredfoXi…AaDGmainnettestnet
Indigirka, RetiredindM…kJ46mainnettestnet
Irina Mitrofanova, RetiredHF4n…XrBQmainnettestnet
Irina.Berlous, Retired9Ltj…HNCrmainnettestnet
Iservers, Retired6cgs…C8fkmainnettestnet
IT-DEX exchange, RetiredAB16…yRCJmainnettestnet
Jack-o-Neill, RetiredCYE4…nCyLmainnettestnet
JetLag, Retired9u45…FBLKmainnettestnet
JI2 Validator, RetiredHb6N…HVSLmainnettestnet
Jito MEV, RetiredFeWf…PzzJmainnettestnet
Juliya, Retired8ne4…ZPMsmainnettestnet
JumpSOL - Solana Labs, Retired34mx…BdRjmainnettestnet
jurijnickolaeff, RetiredG3SC…CVa6mainnettestnet
Justake Juggernaut, Retired8kKW…D4YEmainnettestnet
Kate, RetiredFjU1…ejkxmainnettestnet
KCN, RetiredCYPM…5JEymainnettestnet
KeyQuest ❕, RetiredHJJH…Zqhpmainnettestnet
Kiln1, Retired5pPR…HzSmmainnettestnet465ms84.6
Kraken 2, RetiredCAo1…Sve4mainnettestnet408ms79.6
lanatalka, RetiredCqY9…NUUmmainnettestnet
lapsky, RetiredALTp…MSLFmainnettestnet
Lass Crypto, Retired42ZP…LLkmmainnettestnet
LEDGER, RetiredFnyQ…QC9dmainnettestnet
LegendarySOL, RetiredARRR…CUf8mainnettestnet
Legends, Retired9bky…2Uvrmainnettestnet410ms94.3
lencherkas, Retired6RZs…gELrmainnettestnet
Leprechaun Club, RetiredN2AR…CXdxmainnettestnet
linap, Retired6AJX…vk1Vmainnettestnet
Luiza, Retired6E1j…13Vemainnettestnet
lusit validator +MEV +Jito | 24x7 gainz, RetiredLUSi…i1mJmainnettestnet
LYRK, Retired3qaa…CaWMmainnettestnet
M4711 Validator, RetiredDpBN…2N86mainnettestnet
ma fok, RetiredJ5mg…NCcCmainnettestnet
Magpie, Retired8SoT…UvUBmainnettestnet
malise800, Retired317q…pE5bmainnettestnet
Mari, Retired6ii4…RBbLmainnettestnet
Mars Validator, RetiredAPRj…fDvomainnettestnet
Marsv05, Retired55RE…WVPymainnettestnet
Marynode, RetiredAmpP…j6Jqmainnettestnet
Masternode24.de, Retired6h9j…2om4mainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.