Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,494
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 36 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
83JDq2…D6YvH8mainnettestnet
83ZRM2…fkzATYmainnettestnet
841cQJ…LcArw1mainnettestnet
843e8y…PdAXGZmainnettestnet
84RJ5E…63X1btmainnettestnet
84rL3X…964cm1mainnettestnet
84RZSy…JMsQYFmainnettestnet
85Kqhy…9j7aV6mainnettestnet
85XgWG…YgUUfjmainnettestnet
86ajwR…fyw6Ubmainnettestnet
86Eqe2…WrWjydmainnettestnet
86fzgG…hRanFkmainnettestnet
86vMCH…PRSg9umainnettestnet
8725iz…d8FhK8mainnettestnet
879M9a…SRP9m3mainnettestnet
87iVis…5rUqHumainnettestnet
87JF8D…SDEEFumainnettestnet
87nRnE…b6mZqQmainnettestnet
889VcQ…EwTeywmainnettestnet
88odtG…HtqSPqmainnettestnet
88xMf3…Mp188cmainnettestnet
89Jr5T…nJjmbamainnettestnet
89mQvT…jGBbFMmainnettestnet
89Z2N5…emGZTTmainnettestnet
89ZQ3U…NJiQSomainnettestnet
8A29Gx…hBcPQGmainnettestnet
8A7scy…pfKiZKmainnettestnet
8aGDX3…NBeFeVmainnettestnet
8aigsX…yv8Nckmainnettestnet
8ajgAx…v6FXFVmainnettestnet
8ao2KD…Qt7XCumainnettestnet
8aPHvz…gCrDixmainnettestnet
8ApKpm…BNwEJBmainnettestnet
8aXja5…zYeXLkmainnettestnet
8B1cAv…jbfQycmainnettestnet
8b9mdg…GbeFyJmainnettestnet
8BDU1x…psUoAzmainnettestnet
8bg4S1…r4YQKvmainnettestnet
8bqmh3…ppfTramainnettestnet
8bxscg…qnjF5qmainnettestnet
8C429R…w5s6Qomainnettestnet
8cE5bf…yCHCgzmainnettestnet
8cEfJg…YLz7i9mainnettestnet
8CJnke…yqnkHKmainnettestnet
8Cnj6P…xbJRiumainnettestnet
8DePME…drbG3ymainnettestnet
8DHJG6…1S53i4mainnettestnet
8DhQ45…rGD33nmainnettestnet
8Djqbh…6H7zA3mainnettestnet
8Dkn72…kveV67mainnettestnet
8ds1WL…HuEkrKmainnettestnet
8DS4do…5kazmSmainnettestnet
8dU5EF…BGW67smainnettestnet
8Dv5XQ…m953JCmainnettestnet
8Dw1VT…XN7aymmainnettestnet
8EAgEi…Z1amZKmainnettestnet
8Ebf7V…gEQpWimainnettestnet
8EJmUg…2vaEWzmainnettestnet
8eNrjD…Pt2RE3mainnettestnet
8EnYYw…mgcMWbmainnettestnet
8fD4Vc…JvP77cmainnettestnet
8FkKY5…us6eg9mainnettestnet
8Fmuws…e2Lunqmainnettestnet
8G1Hqq…jvhKhUmainnettestnet
8gjyk4…9yrohmmainnettestnet
8gkgfz…2Emvnemainnettestnet
8GKnBM…p4yWYrmainnettestnet
8GMikG…YA9w45mainnettestnet
8gqCno…N2fLATmainnettestnet
8Gqcrh…5g3DaCmainnettestnet
8gqt3Y…T7Qzd5mainnettestnet
8grJd5…DfHswamainnettestnet
8hbJ8h…R5FJ6Lmainnettestnet
8HcBpk…YuSy31mainnettestnet
8HgW6a…TNYRJumainnettestnet
8Hrj9p…bVpD39mainnettestnet
8HW627…jwsLFPmainnettestnet
8HWvv1…afQufGmainnettestnet
8i1y4u…4m2BYtmainnettestnet
8iqA8C…c57xWkmainnettestnet
8iX31D…3ukbgFmainnettestnet
8j2LMn…gUVe5Nmainnettestnet
8j5kjK…GeH8Gwmainnettestnet
8j8VLu…q97mTumainnettestnet
8JHyMZ…5sanX8mainnettestnet
8jP8r5…jCBZTamainnettestnet
8jYuNk…4mrBC3mainnettestnet
8jyygz…iYPxpUmainnettestnet
8KFcdC…fChrS4mainnettestnet
8kkmGS…9i6R5Gmainnettestnet
8koXHb…Bn3ksPmainnettestnet
8kvkbC…D6HCELmainnettestnet
8L47Qp…QPpn7Xmainnettestnet
8LdcVs…NNnSUGmainnettestnet
8LfXC4…ZQBxiimainnettestnet
8Lx9SA…WM4ZkNmainnettestnet
8LyS59…SwnXRsmainnettestnet
8M2FGE…xmxbfvmainnettestnet
8Mc85S…oTMFb4mainnettestnet
8McM6N…VMSVJNDepartedmainnet76.1%testnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.