Skip to content

Validators

10,966 on record · 513 with published grades · grades 18 Aug · membership 18 Aug

In view
3,492
of 10,966 on record · 34 departed
Combined
88.0%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Mainnet all-time
96.3%
median · 19 rated
0%100%
Testnet all-time
79.9%
median · 34 rated
0%100%
Departed
34
in view · grades retained

median M mainnet 96.3% · T testnet 79.9%

Retired SFDP validators, with state and recorded join epoch, plus pass rate over all graded epochs for mainnet-beta and testnet, the mean of the two, median time the leader took to build a block, over one epoch, published by IBRL (ibrl.wtf), and the block-building score published by IBRL
ValidatorMeanIBRLBuild timeIBRLScore
5TrFtX…NhUX1gmainnettestnet
5TWWXT…m7MPq2mainnettestnet
5tXsJi…mhgoGCmainnettestnet
5uBV18…PUjo5Amainnettestnet
5uEL7P…v9X7rMmainnettestnet
5UfkCk…JKJgdymainnettestnet
5ug92K…Pdbyogmainnettestnet
5uiv81…ARUpBkmainnettestnet
5uj5h2…axdPrUmainnettestnet
5ukdcg…Jk8KA7mainnettestnet
5ukjvx…fD4f3pmainnettestnet
5uLFJg…f3GdnXmainnettestnet
5UZ7ha…x2vQD7mainnettestnet
5ViyuX…ossZDXmainnettestnet
5vjFqF…z7MLXcmainnettestnet
5vnjmW…tCMjnSmainnettestnet
5VsELF…sASJMNmainnettestnet
5vzm3k…yGjGwFmainnettestnet
5w7X21…LQ1cBTmainnettestnet
5WA9yR…cZKA9kmainnettestnet
5WHiRF…R1mAFHmainnettestnet
5wRJ51…5M7qhFmainnettestnet
5ws22W…ScyWCUmainnettestnet
5WV7tF…hmknTxmainnettestnet
5X9zWS…P11BGRmainnettestnet
5xARyN…zqBNY9mainnettestnet
5XbFDc…h4DKCvmainnettestnet
5xdUBe…KiCHfRmainnettestnet
5XjatN…ooTpWUmainnettestnet
5XN7gN…5re49Wmainnettestnet
5XnDFy…qQdYmMmainnettestnet
5xq2kX…6kNxyLmainnettestnet
5xQ5Nv…xM6WrBmainnettestnet
5xQt8S…HZ3R5rmainnettestnet
5xud3L…7JnyAYmainnettestnet
5Y6HZE…Pr7Mz8mainnettestnet
5YFB4N…4AzMAwmainnettestnet
5YPaSg…LU2aPEmainnettestnet
5yqeBg…yBADTrmainnettestnet
5yusuK…oe8KS1mainnettestnet
5Yy5fm…kimYLVmainnettestnet
618UWa…bPfHU5mainnettestnet
61Uyd6…V6QzHsmainnettestnet
61xbKS…p6oN1qmainnettestnet
632yay…inzWyjmainnettestnet
63CTUY…rqgZXsmainnettestnet
63rRbV…RMAjnGmainnettestnet
64JJR8…JHuiqimainnettestnet
64y7yY…SaDJV6mainnettestnet
65rLCp…c4AkWrmainnettestnet
65uPbM…Dkpp8imainnettestnet
66eCHQ…RxmsLomainnettestnet
66L6n8…Fj8jsDmainnettestnet
67aAfL…fR7sPSmainnettestnet
67MXsU…qKeUTBmainnettestnet
67RZk5…hiwEJVmainnettestnet
67sRbq…7wNZgtmainnettestnet
67vDpr…2575wrmainnettestnet
67YvfX…rHggAJmainnettestnet
682Lms…LSeC9Lmainnettestnet
68EzC2…bbq7tBmainnettestnet
68f7h3…pAXnVCmainnettestnet
68Gqgu…kimfyJmainnettestnet
68jbum…bvA3H1mainnettestnet
68M9cL…AoBE7smainnettestnet
69Hkhj…GYNUdumainnettestnet
6a8ygm…73MFfYmainnettestnet
6Af8NS…EReDaFmainnettestnet
6aLH71…8bbQ2imainnettestnet
6bSvwu…z7LjFymainnettestnet
6BYmq9…MgwYPymainnettestnet
6cfE31…VYaWqNmainnettestnet
6cP9LH…kr8kb5mainnettestnet
6cURPN…Xsx43Cmainnettestnet
6derbq…zCnbuJmainnettestnet
6dfDYH…hNjzrHmainnettestnet
6dpdFg…TZoxQJmainnettestnet
6DrTUU…82Lafomainnettestnet
6dUtah…Qomudmmainnettestnet
6DXuQn…CFdQPDmainnettestnet
6DZ1qW…SutAoRmainnettestnet
6e5aeC…4KAtF1mainnettestnet
6edQLD…ZRovaamainnettestnet
6Ehf8i…p7Cu6emainnettestnet
6EMdeV…KYrUEGmainnettestnet
6er8GV…DfAZ7omainnettestnet
6eSVr3…X6ABW5mainnettestnet
6ezbQW…BfM6Rnmainnettestnet
6Ezms9…PVGwT9mainnettestnet
6F99QA…2y2rsZmainnettestnet
6f9MKC…E6VSFomainnettestnet
6fg1cP…qwfJvQmainnettestnet
6FHWuS…k2RZBJmainnettestnet
6FKRrW…egC4pvmainnettestnet
6fLVyy…zxXs97mainnettestnet
6G2C7x…LgiDU5mainnettestnet
6gbFTa…GqSQDkmainnettestnet
6gDKGc…BFhbwMmainnettestnet
6GjS2f…bgjNBTmainnettestnet
6gKqq9…44Aujnmainnettestnet

Shadingunder 85%85% to 95%95% or betterthis site’s banding, not a program threshold: the program publishes per-epoch floors, not a pass-rate cut-off

Build time410ms or faster411 to 425ms426ms or slowerthis site’s cut points, not IBRL’s and not Trillium’s: IBRL publishes no band for build time, and Trillium never measured it. Same 410 and 425ms marks as slot time, because both sit in the same range, so the scale holds when you switch source; build time bunches tighter, so the colour separates less

How these numbers are measured

All-time is the share of every graded epoch the program marked Bonus or Baseline. Combinedis the mean of the two clusters, weighted equally, and is this site’s own figure: the program publishes no combined score. Epochs the program never assessed are gaps: they count on neither side of the division, so a validator with 200 graded epochs, 20 failures and 300 gaps reads 90%, not 39%. Bars run 0% to 100%; the percentage is always printed beside them.

The two clusters are judged against different published floors, so the columns are not a like-for-like comparison. Current thresholds for both are on the criteria page. Grades are the program’s own, counted here and never re-derived; a validator with no published grade for a cluster shows an em dash and sorts last under either direction, because an absence is not a low score.

The timing column and the IBRLscore are the figures here that are not the program’s own, and neither is a program threshold or has any bearing on a validator’s grades. The timing column takes one of two sources, and they are not the same measurement. Build time is the median time the leader took to build a block over a single epoch, from IBRL, and is the default. Slot time is the mean wall-clock duration of a slot over the last 10 epochs, from Trillium. Across the 437 validators carrying both they correlate at 0.57: the medians sit 7ms apart and the ranges overlap, yet half the validators differ by more than 15ms and one by 78ms. Switching the source therefore changes what is being measured, which is why the column header and its attribution change with it. Coverage differs too, and is not interchangeable: Trillium covers 449 validators on this roster, IBRL 441, so a validator can carry a figure in one mode and an em dash in the other. The per-validator page carries the same toggle, and its ten-epoch strip reads either source: IBRL’s endpoint answers per epoch, so that strip covers 463 validators against the 437 this column counts for one epoch.

Both modes are banded at the same 410 and 425ms, and the cut points are attributed differently in each. In slot-time mode they are Trillium’s own: 410ms is exactly where their slot_duration_is_lagging flag flips. In build-time mode they are this site’s reading, and they belong to neither vendor, because IBRL publishes no band for build time and Trillium never measured build time at all. The same marks are reused because the two distributions sit in the same range across the Approved set, 353 to 458ms of build time against 347 to 477ms of slot time, so a reader switching source does not have the scale move under them. The colour is blunter that way, and this is the cost rather than a hidden one: of the 359 Approved validators carrying a build time, 52% land at or under 410ms, 47% between 411 and 425ms and 2% above, where slot time spreads across all three bands. Neither set of cut points is a program threshold, neither affects a validator’s grades, and the millisecond value is printed beside the colour in both modes.

The score out of 100 is published by IBRL for epoch 1017, covering 441validators on this roster, and is stored exactly as published: this site derives no score, rank or composite of its own from it. The score and both timing sources measure mainnet block production, so where a validator funded on testnet only has no figure the cell reads “not on mainnet” rather than an em dash. A few of them do lead mainnet blocks, and those show the measured number.

Grade history covers the 513 validators the program has funded, including 34 in this view marked Departed. A departed record is frozen at the moment this site observed the removal; the program publishes no exit date and no reason, so the observation date is evidence of when, not a decision date.

Joined is the join epoch the program records. Many validators were graded before that epoch; where that is so the row says so, because no earlier join date is published.

Display names come from the program’s validator list, which carries them for 4,982 pubkeys, and a logo for 2,716. Unnamed records show a truncated pubkey and sort after named ones under the name sort. The logo is the operator’s own image as the program publishes it, shown beside the name to make a row identifiable at a glance; it is decoration and nothing is sorted, filtered or graded by it. Where a validator has no logo the space stays empty rather than showing a stand-in, because an absent logo is not missing data. Everything here is read from files committed to this repository; nothing is fetched while the page renders.